• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Using existing fleets to achieve SouthEastern fleet replacement

Status
Not open for further replies.

WizCastro197

Established Member
Joined
12 May 2022
Messages
1,463
Location
Reigate
Completely pie in the sky but how about Thameslinks 700's? Reduced length units for Orpington - Victoria & Dartford - Vic. Full length units for everything else. SDO solves the Charing Cross, Woolwich Dockyard issues. All have in cab monitors so cutting cost at manual dispatch stations.

Quick conversion course from 707's, and drivers at Orpington who used to sign them anyway.


Thameslink then get new stock far better suited to their longer distance services.
I think you forget that Thameslink 700s are well suited to their services? They often have huge loadings and more longer distance stock, would heavily decrease passenger capacity and more importantly passenger standing capacity.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

mightyena

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2011
Messages
51
Quite. A unit more suited for the longer distance runs would be woefully inadequate through the core
 

WizCastro197

Established Member
Joined
12 May 2022
Messages
1,463
Location
Reigate
Quite. A unit more suited for the longer distance runs would be woefully inadequate through the core
Yes in a different thread, people were speculating having a 444 type train run services which would’ve been detrimental to passenger loadings and satisfaction
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
7,630
I think you forget that Thameslink 700s are well suited to their services? They often have huge loadings and more longer distance stock, would heavily decrease passenger capacity and more importantly passenger standing capacity.
Do we actually NEED so much standing capacity now, seeing that they were ordered for a pre Covid/WFH world where passenger numbers coming into London were expected to grow and grow.
 

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
3,463
Location
belfast
Do we actually NEED so much standing capacity now, seeing that they were ordered for a pre Covid/WFH world where passenger numbers coming into London were expected to grow and grow.
New trains are bought for the next 40 years or so, and it seems likely that passenger numbers into london will grow, so we should allow for the standing space in the order

With the second-hand option this is less relevant, as they won't be around as long as new trains. The tender said 15 years, so let's go with that. But the same thing still applies, even if the trains are only around for 15 years.
 

Royal351

Member
Joined
27 Apr 2022
Messages
75
Location
Redhill
Do we actually NEED so much standing capacity now, seeing that they were ordered for a pre Covid/WFH world where passenger numbers coming into London were expected to grow and grow.
A bit late on this, but god yes. You see them come into Redhill in the evening peak. Or even some of thee morning peak trains. Nearly every seat is taken by redhill going up on various 12 cars and 8 car sets for a few trains in the peak. And then there's the 00:53 from RDH to Bedford....good luck getting a seat on that at times
 

WizCastro197

Established Member
Joined
12 May 2022
Messages
1,463
Location
Reigate
A bit late on this, but god yes. You see them come into Redhill in the evening peak. Or even some of thee morning peak trains. Nearly every seat is taken by redhill going up on various 12 cars and 8 car sets for a few trains in the peak. And then there's the 00:53 from RDH to Bedford....good luck getting a seat on that at times
After Thameslink's little hoo-ha in the Summer, most people seem to be scared back onto Victoria bound services at Redhill but I am not sure about the dead of night, so I'll take your word for it.

Tenders have now closed as well, is anyone aware when we may see the winner (s) announced? I highly doubt, the existing rolling stock tender has been successful.
 

Brubulus

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2022
Messages
647
Location
Cambridge
I think the most reasonable solution to this problem is 387s from GN and GWR with them being replaced with 379s and 350/2s respectively. I understand that the maintainance situation isn't great for GWR with these trains and they don't meet everything specified in the tender, but they are the best existing trains for the job.
 

WizCastro197

Established Member
Joined
12 May 2022
Messages
1,463
Location
Reigate
I think the most reasonable solution to this problem is 387s from GN and GWR with them being replaced with 379s and 350/2s respectively. I understand that the maintainance situation isn't great for GWR with these trains and they don't meet everything specified in the tender, but they are the best existing trains for the job.
Are they suitable for metro operation?
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
7,630
They worked on TL, and while I understand the seating and door times aren't perfect for metro, they aren't unsuitable.
And Southeastern already have 376s and 707s, so aren't short of metro stock when compared to say Southern
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
I think the most reasonable solution to this problem is 387s from GN and GWR with them being replaced with 379s and 350/2s respectively. I understand that the maintainance situation isn't great for GWR with these trains and they don't meet everything specified in the tender, but they are the best existing trains for the job.
I doubt that the class 379 units will be used by GWR. However, I can see the 29 class 387/1's with Great Northern being replaced by the 30 class 379 units, as there would be little paintwork required on the class 379 units. Great Northern would still have 7 class 387 units in the shape of 1 class 387/2 and the 6 class 387/3 units if the details within https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Class_387 are correct. I don't believe that the details are correct, as it is not showing what has happened to 387202 - 387204.
 

Brubulus

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2022
Messages
647
Location
Cambridge
I doubt that the class 379 units will be used by GWR. However, I can see the 29 class 387/1's with Great Northern being replaced by the 30 class 379 units, as there would be little paintwork required on the class 379 units. Great Northern would still have 7 class 387 units in the shape of 1 class 387/2 and the 6 class 387/3 units if the details within https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Class_387 are correct. I don't believe that the details are correct, as it is not showing what has happened to 387202 - 387204.
The 387/2 is going to Southern. The plan would be to send all the 387/1 and /3 to SE with 379s going to GN and GWR getting 350/2s, though that is unlikely given the investment by GWR in maintainance for the Electrostars. Instead it would simply be the GN 387/1 and /3s .The only place I can now see the 350/2s going other than scrappage is Scotland given that they can be maintained alongside the 380s.
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
8,966
Location
Taunton or Kent
The 387/2 is going to Southern. The plan would be to send all the 387/1 and /3 to SE with 379s going to GN and GWR getting 350/2s, though that is unlikely given the investment by GWR in maintainance for the Electrostars. Instead it would simply be the GN 387/1 and /3s .The only place I can now see the 350/2s going other than scrappage is Scotland given that they can be maintained alongside the 380s.
SE have enough micro fleets as it is without adding 387s to the collection.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,424
However, I can see the 29 class 387/1's with Great Northern being replaced by the 30 class 379 units, as there would be little paintwork required on the class 379 units.
I suspect that paintwork has absolutely nothing to do with the destination of rolling stock. It has been pointed out before that one reason the 379s aren't going to GN is because 387s are a better fit for the future introduction of ETCS.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top