• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Welcome aboard this… service for…

railpigeon

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2024
Messages
33
Location
Oxford
For the second time in two days I have noticed the announcement say “Welcome aboard this service to [destination]”, rather than “Welcome aboard this [operator name] service to [destination]”.

It happened on a Southern service yesterday, GA today.

Are announcements being de-branded? Or am I reading too much into it? It certainly feels as though there is half a beat missing where the tape has been spliced to remove the operator’s name.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

dangie

Established Member
Joined
4 May 2011
Messages
2,159
Location
Rugeley Staffordshire
I’m sure most rail users don’t care a jot which rail operator it is, they just want to know where the train is going, and more to the point thankful that it’s actually running.
 

OscarH

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2020
Messages
909
Location
Crawley
Was your Southern train green? They're now using some Gatwick Express and ex-Great Northern 387s units which don't seem to have the "Southern" recording causing this.
 

bleeder4

Member
Joined
19 Jan 2019
Messages
468
Location
Worcester
I’m sure most rail users don’t care a jot which rail operator it is, they just want to know where the train is going, and more to the point thankful that it’s actually running.
Indeed, I was typing a similar comment myself. I think it's only the users of this forum who would notice such a change. The majority of passengers only care where the train is going, not which company is running it, so removing extraneous wording is a good thing in my book.
 

Hadlow Road

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2024
Messages
91
Location
N E Wales
And, if the system is going to be edited, could the pauses, changes of tone and changes of emphasis all be recorded to provide a proper, coherent and fluid announcement.

i applaud the loss of the operator‘s name; it adds little to any necessary and helpful information.
 

SimplyLlama

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2021
Messages
71
Location
Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
For the second time in two days I have noticed the announcement say “Welcome aboard this service to [destination]”, rather than “Welcome aboard this [operator name] service to [destination]”.

It happened on a Southern service yesterday, GA today.

Are announcements being de-branded? Or am I reading too much into it? It certainly feels as though there is half a beat missing where the tape has been spliced to remove the operator’s name.
I seem to remember that Greater Anglia have never done it (or at least not since the introduction of their new fleet), but I may be mistaken
 

Vexed

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2020
Messages
298
Location
Herts / Hants
With the current ticketing structure I'd be against this (if it's actually a policy and not just coincidence). People travelling on operator specific tickets will want confirmation that they are traveling in accordance with their ticket restrictions.
 

HughT

Member
Joined
21 Feb 2018
Messages
135
Location
Cambridge
I seem to remember that Greater Anglia have never done it (or at least not since the introduction of their new fleet), but I may be mistaken

Certainly the case on Cambridge-Liverpool St services. I *think* this goes all the way back to the pre-GA days, when someone realised how stupid/confusing it would be to say "Welcome to this ONE service to ..."

Perhaps there's a case for it with routes covered by more than one operator, and where operator-specific tickets are available. But if you're on the wrong train, the announcement is probably coming too late to help!
 

azOOOOOma

Member
Joined
16 Mar 2023
Messages
225
Location
Durham
With the current ticketing structure I'd be against this (if it's actually a policy and not just coincidence). People travelling on operator specific tickets will want confirmation that they are traveling in accordance with their ticket restrictions.

I agree.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,428
I’m sure most rail users don’t care a jot which rail operator it is, they just want to know where the train is going, and more to the point thankful that it’s actually running.
Can we get rid of the LNER announcements where it says ‘welcome aboard this LNER Azuma service to xxx’, and when approaching the terminating station, ‘we are now arriving at London Kings Cross where we finish our journey today’?
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
For the second time in two days I have noticed the announcement say “Welcome aboard this service to [destination]”, rather than “Welcome aboard this [operator name] service to [destination]”.

It happened on a Southern service yesterday, GA today.

Are announcements being de-branded? Or am I reading too much into it? It certainly feels as though there is half a beat missing where the tape has been spliced to remove the operator’s name.
Its been the case on the Southern services using Class 387 Gatwick Express Coaches since they were introduced on the east coastway services during the pandemic.
 

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
4,681
I’m sure most rail users don’t care a jot which rail operator it is,
Until they get Penalty Fare'd or reported for prosecution for travelling on one operator, when they had an operator specific ticket for another.
 

styles

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
746
Location
Midlothian
If the purpose of specifying the operator is primarily avoiding passengers receiving penalty fares for operator-specific tickets, then really each service (where multiple operators run the same route and operator-specific tickets are available) need also to announce that passengers should check their ticket to ensure it is valid on this service. A classic example being travelling on Avanti London to Birmingham, on LNWR restricted tickets. In fact the announcement really ought to highlight the wording on invalid tickets.

I'm all for making announcements more concise, and the overall noise of announcements about lifts being available, slippery surfaces, no skateboarding, smoking including e-cigarettes, CCTV is in operation, etc mind-numbing; I'd rather an announcement about which tickets are/aren't valid than one where the train manager lists the buffet cart menu.
 

Ghostbus

On Moderation
Joined
17 Sep 2024
Messages
331
Location
England
Surely only a temporary relief from auditory clutter (no offence, visually impaired folks!)

Welcome to the Great British Railways service to Biggleswick.

Welcome to the [Open Access Operator] service to Biggleswick.

All services to Biggleswick are cancelled. Please contact your service provider for advice on how to get your money back and alternative travel options.
 

swing

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2023
Messages
29
Location
North Herts
If the purpose of specifying the operator is primarily avoiding passengers receiving penalty fares for operator-specific tickets, then really each service (where multiple operators run the same route and operator-specific tickets are available) need also to announce that passengers should check their ticket to ensure it is valid on this service. A classic example being travelling on Avanti London to Birmingham, on LNWR restricted tickets. In fact the announcement really ought to highlight the wording on invalid tickets.
I've travelled a number of times on Avanti London Euston to Manchester trains in the past year, and well before leaving Euston I regularly hear a manual announcement from the Train Manager reminding passengers about operator specific tickets (often explicitly listing the exact wording of the operator-specific information on the ticket to make it clear which are not valid), and also discussing the validity of split tickets.
 

styles

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
746
Location
Midlothian
I've travelled a number of times on Avanti London Euston to Manchester trains in the past year, and well before leaving Euston I regularly hear a manual announcement from the Train Manager reminding passengers about operator specific tickets (often explicitly listing the exact wording of the operator-specific information on the ticket to make it clear which are not valid), and also discussing the validity of split tickets.
Indeed, and I think this is a good thing. I wish other operators would do the same.

It helps remove that confusion from passengers trying to navigate a complex ticketing system.
 

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
1,990
Location
All around the network
Surely only a temporary relief from auditory clutter (no offence, visually impaired folks!)
You could also make a case for some disabilities having problems with too much noise. There are so many disabilities it's folly to try and provide for all of them with conflicting needs. The best thing is to keep it simple, like, every single other country that doesn't have excessive announcements on its transport. The biggest announcement that has to go it 'see it say it sorted'. I regularly hear people mimic it in a brainless way. When a phrase is repeated so many times it loses all meaning and effectiveness.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,175
With the current ticketing structure I'd be against this (if it's actually a policy and not just coincidence). People travelling on operator specific tickets will want confirmation that they are traveling in accordance with their ticket restrictions.
Yes, where two or more companies operate on the same line. I've travelled recently on an Avanti super off peak return and LNW super off peak return, and while to me it's obvious which company I'm on, it might not be to an infrequent traveller.

As an aside, under nationalised rail will we lose these train specific tickets (eg the aforesaid returns from Milton Keynes to London)?
 

1955LR

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2019
Messages
270
Location
Hereford
What annoys me is the message about Ticket validity is often made after the train departs when it is too late to do anything if you have it wrong.
 

Vexed

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2020
Messages
298
Location
Herts / Hants
What annoys me is the message about Ticket validity is often made after the train departs when it is too late to do anything if you have it wrong.
But it means you can actively seek out the train manger/guard which shows you're acting in good faith, and might lead to a better outcome then them finding out while inspecting tickets.
 

QueensCurve

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2014
Messages
1,978
Are announcements being de-branded? Or am I reading too much into it? It certainly feels as though there is half a beat missing where the tape has been spliced to remove the operator’s name.
One can beut hope they are being debranded.
 

Class 466

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
1,782
Location
Atherton, UK
Can we get rid of the LNER announcements where it says ‘welcome aboard this LNER Azuma service to xxx’, and when approaching the terminating station, ‘we are now arriving at London Kings Cross where we finish our journey today’?
You missed the part where it says “Hello” at the start of that announcement for some reason
 
Joined
28 Nov 2021
Messages
251
Location
Leith
As far as I know, Great Northern services between Kings Cross and Cambridge/Kings Lynn have always had a momentary pause in the opening phrase "Welcome aboard this ... service...". I've heard various suggestions as to what word is missing, the most appropriate being my other half's suggestion: "Welcome aboard this unspeakable service...".
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,428
You missed the part where it says “Hello” at the start of that announcement for some reason
Yeah, all we need is a simple, ‘this is the 1020 service to King’s Cross, calling at York, Doncaster, Peterborough and Kings Cross’, next stop will be York’.
 

Railcar

Member
Joined
27 Nov 2017
Messages
268
A Southern service to Sutton caused confusion a few years ago due to the mis-pronunciation of the two words
 

centraltrains

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2015
Messages
493
Location
West Midlands
London Midland has the same phenomena on the 172s in the last few weeks/months of the franchise.

"We are now approaching Whitlock's End, our final destination. Thank you for travelling with London Midland."
changed to
"We are now approaching Whitlock's End, our final destination. Thank you for travelling with us today."

It always felt like a special easter egg as you only got to hear it if staying on until the final stop, which as a stop just on the edge of the countryside certainly felt a little odd. The new one far less personal to the company and less enjoyable.

The announcements got far more annoying since WMR took over, every station has "Please step onto the platform before removing heavy luggage and pushchairs", and then they list all the calling stations to Kidderminster at both Tyseley and Small Heath which is a little much, pick one of the other please! Most of us won't be going beyond Moor Street/Snow Hill anyway so a little irrelevant!

A little of an off topic ramble/vent at the end their apologies! I will end by saying if it is as a lean towards a national unbranded standard, I hope a sensible level of national consistency is achieved.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
9,469
Location
London
For the second time in two days I have noticed the announcement say “Welcome aboard this service to [destination]”, rather than “Welcome aboard this [operator name] service to [destination]”.

Station or on-board?
 

Top