• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Welsh Government proposals map for North Wales Metro

Status
Not open for further replies.

squizzler

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2017
Messages
1,906
Location
Jersey, Channel Islands
On 10 September, Ken Skates introduced a scematic map of proposals for the North Wales Metro to the Senedd. Reported in Modern Railways October edition on page 17. My first impressions are that they look like they mean business in transforming the North Wales rail offering:
  • Conway Valley service extended over disused lines to Transfynedd to Amlwch
  • New railway: Bangor - Caernarfon - Portmadoc
  • New stations: Wrexham North, Wrexham South, Broughton, South Cheshire Parkway.
  • Lots of new services in the Northeast to provide better connectivity with mersey region.
North Wales main line: rail network map

Map showing our ambitions for the north Wales rail line.
Major upgrades such as capacity, line speed, rolling stock and widespread electrification. This will enable:
  • additional express services for better connectivity
  • improved journey times
  • more local commuter services
  • address major network bottlenecks
  • interchange at key hubs
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,927
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
2tph on the Conwy Valley, just wait while I go into fits of laughter.

1tp2h clockface should be achievable, though, and would be very desirable because a properly integrated Snowdon Sherpa bus network would be easier to connect to it at Betws. It could just about be done with one unit with some speed upgrades if it didn't run past the Junction. However, for a through service to Llandudno on present timings I *think* it would need an extra loop.
 

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
7,346
So they want the Holyhead / Cardiff service to omit Chester, which probably serves as many passengers as the combination of numbers from most of the other stations between Holyhead & Shrewsbury ??
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
::starts reading::

Ooh, a direct Llandudno - Bangor service sounds like a sensible proposal - this feels like the kind of local link that can justify a frequent Arriva bus service but the railway isn't currently competing because there are only* long distance services running in this neck of the woods, so local demands are sadly secondary to the whims of long distance paths, e.g. no scope to make additional stops as you have a fixed path into Manchester/ Birmingham - would be good if resources were found for a Llandudno - Bangor link...

...a frequent Wrexham - Chester service is again a line with enough demand to sustain a frequent bus service where the train service is limited to only long distance trips...

...a frequent Wrexham - Borderlands - Liverpool service would be excellent, provide lots of connections at Shotton, would make Wrexham a much more attractive place for potential Liverpool commuters...

::reads the rest of the suggestions and realises that there's not enough Crayola in the world to waste on this kind of daydreaming::

(* - I believe that there is occasionally a Llandudno - Blaneu Ffestiniog service that tends to run for a couple of weeks at a time before the line is washed away again and tens of millions of pounds are spent on "fixing" it again, so it's not entirely all local round there)

I've always thought Lsd was a Welsh word.

:lol:

So they want the Holyhead / Cardiff service to omit Chester, which probably serves as many passengers as the combination of numbers from most of the other stations between Holyhead & Shrewsbury ??

We've already had the "WAG Express" omitting Hereford (despite finding time to stop at Colwyn Bay etc) - I don't know how much more obvious Cardiff Bay has to make it that they don't care about people living on the "wrong" side of the border - the fact that they'd happily build a new chord at Shotton and cut off the Chester market for the sake of saving a couple of minutes seems pure politics to me.
 

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
3,573
Location
Western Part of the UK
And this is why the Welsh Govt need to keep out of the railways.
Just..... Look at how bonkers these proposals are. You could give a child a map of the railways in Wales and some crayons and they would come up with better results. As per with the Welsh Govt, pure fantasy. I'd love to know what goes round in their heads when they are coming up with these plans as money and sense go out of the window. There's more brain cells in a fish than the Welsh Govt ministers combined. We all want a railway to our front door, it simply isn't possible financially. I'd put money on the fact they will want the UK taxpayers to fund it while they get all the benefits.

We've already had the "WAG Express" omitting Hereford (despite finding time to stop at Colwyn Bay etc) - I don't know how much more obvious Cardiff Bay has to make it that they don't care about people living on the "wrong" side of the border - the fact that they'd happily build a new chord at Shotton and cut off the Chester market for the sake of saving a couple of minutes seems pure politics to me.
It was only the other month that they wanted to get Alstom to move Chester depot a few miles up the track so that it was in Wales. The Welsh Govt should NEVER have been created. I can see no good things that have come from there. Money just goes missing on these fantasy projects meanwhile Welsh councils are struggling to run standard council services because of the lack of funds.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,087
Location
Airedale
Bangor to Porthmadog ....reopening, not new lines
ISTR the proposal is part new-build at the southern end, following the A487 from Bryncir into Porthmadog rather than taking the detour via Afon Wen.

So they want the Holyhead / Cardiff service to omit Chester, which probably serves as many passengers as the combination of numbers from most of the other stations between Holyhead & Shrewsbury ??
To be fair, that is described as "possible" which in the context of the other proposals I would translate into English as "even less likely than some of the rest."

That said, Llandudno-Bangor-Caernarfon or variants thereon would be good.

OT - good thing Aberystwyth and Carmarthen aren't in North Wales :)
 

Llandudno

Established Member
Joined
25 Dec 2014
Messages
2,207
I think Ken Skates is a troll for this forum!

None of this will ever happen, it will end up in the same filing cabinet as Aberystwyth to Carmarthen!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,927
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I think Ken Skates is a troll for this forum!

None of this will ever happen, it will end up in the same filing cabinet as Aberystwyth to Carmarthen!

Perhaps they could come up with something, you know, possibly actually workable?

I do think Bangor-Caernarfon[1] needs building, and you'd fill it up with tourists as well as locals for winter - I reckon it could easily do better than MK-Aylesbury on EWR (if that happens). Boats aside it'd carry more passengers than Holyhead does. The Conwy Valley to 2 hourly clockface and sorting out the Snowdon Sherpa timetable to connect with it is also needed. But beyond that it's all fanciful.

[1] The plan I believe long term is Cardiff-Holyhead, Manchester-Bangor and Liverpool-Llandudno as the 3 main hourly services on the Coast - the middle one could easily be extended to Caernarfon.
 

LSWR Cavalier

Established Member
Joined
23 Aug 2020
Messages
1,565
Location
Leafy Suburbia
And Trawsfynydd - Bala Junction - Corwen to link up with the Llangollen Railway
It could follow the road around Llyn Celyn
The existing North Wales coast line could be upgraded too
..
The plans seem quite reasonable and realistic to me

Cymru am byth!
 

Llandudno

Established Member
Joined
25 Dec 2014
Messages
2,207
Perhaps they could come up with something, you know, possibly actually workable?

I do think Bangor-Caernarfon[1] needs building, and you'd fill it up with tourists as well as locals for winter - I reckon it could easily do better than MK-Aylesbury on EWR (if that happens). Boats aside it'd carry more passengers than Holyhead does. The Conwy Valley to 2 hourly clockface and sorting out the Snowdon Sherpa timetable to connect with it is also needed. But beyond that it's all fanciful.

[1] The plan I believe long term is Cardiff-Holyhead, Manchester-Bangor and Liverpool-Llandudno as the 3 main hourly services on the Coast - the middle one could easily be extended to Caernarfon.
Of course, this is what should happen with a clock face 20 minute frequency between Chester and Llandudno Junction. It won’t though, there will be irregular stopping patterns, two trains within 10 minutes and then nothing for 30+ minutes - remember this is TfW.

A single track extension from Bangor to Caernarfon is all that is needed to provide an hourly service, it’s hard to believe that work hasn’t already started on this extension as Caernarfon is the Welsh speaking capital of Wales and a Plaid Cymru stronghold!

If this was Scotland trains would have been operating on this route a decade ago.
 

London Trains

Member
Joined
9 Oct 2017
Messages
912
I'd just make there be 4tph at even 15m intervals between Chester and Llandudno Jct (and 2tph at even 30m intervals to Holyhead):

1tph London to Holyhead
1tph Manchester to Bangor
1tph Cardiff to Holyhead
1tph Liverpool to Llandudno

Avanti can order more bimode 805s to operate to Holyhead hourly.
 

Llandudno

Established Member
Joined
25 Dec 2014
Messages
2,207
I'd just make there be 4tph at even 15m intervals between Chester and Llandudno Jct (and 2tph at even 30m intervals to Holyhead):

1tph London to Holyhead
1tph Manchester to Bangor
1tph Cardiff to Holyhead
1tph Liverpool to Llandudno

Avanti can order more bimode 805s to operate to Holyhead hourly.
As much as I would love to see your suggestion come to fruition, there simply isn’t the demand for 4 trains per hour all day west of Chester.

What should happen (but won’t politically) is:

Hourly Liverpool - Llandudno
Hourly Manchester - Bangor (Caernarfon)
Every 2 hours London - Holyhead
Every 2 hours Cardiff - Holyhead
Every 2 hours Llandudno - Blaenau Ffestiniog

Plus a decent Snowdon Sherpa bus network connecting with trains and through fares
Bangor - Llanberis - Pen-y-Pass - Betws y Coed
Blaenau Ffestiniog - Porthmadog
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,568
I can't see why they have a through service to Caernarfon/Porthmadog from Amlwch but not from anywhere east of Bangor; and no increase from 0.5tph on the Cambrian Coast. Based on the long-term aspiration for 5tph off-peak (6tph peak) between Chester and Llandudno Junction and 5tph between Llandudno Junction and Bangor, I'd suggest something more like:
  • 2tph Chester* - Llandudno (all stops), plus a 3rd train per hour in the peaks
  • 1tph Chester* - Holyhead (all existing stations)
  • 1tph Chester* - Holyhead (calling at Flint, Rhyl, Llandudno Junction and Bangor only)
  • 0.5tph Chester* - Caernarfon/Porthmadog (calling at Flint, Preastatyn, Rhyl, Colwyn Bay, Llandudno Junction, Bangor and Y Felinheli)
  • 0.5tph Chester* - Caernarfon/Porthmadog (calling at Shotton, Flint, Preastatyn, Rhyl, Colwyn Bay, Llandudno Junction, Conwy, Bangor and Y Felinheli)
  • 1tph Holyhead - Llandudno (all stops)
  • 1tph Amlwch - Llandudno (all stops)
  • 0.5tph Amlwch - Caernarfon/Porthmadog (all stops)
  • 0.5tph Amlwch - Caernarfon/Pwllheli (all stops)
  • 0.5tph Pwllheli - Birmingham International (all stops west of Shrewsbury)
  • 0.5tph Bangor/Porthmadog - Newtown (limited stop via Cambrian Coast, and possibly extended to Birmingham International, Wrexham General (via Oswestry) or Brecon (via Mid Wales Line))
* All services to/from Chester would start back from elsewhere, I'd suggest 1tph Liverpool (calling points as now, plus Frodsham and Helsby if any current services omit them), 2tph Manchester (one all-stops west of Newton-Le-Willows as-now, the other calling at Warrington Bank Quay only) and 2tph from Crewe (with one starting back from Birmingham, perhaps itself starting back from London post-HS2) with the peak-extra being the existing second slow Manchester. Three times per day (each way) the fast Holyhead path would run to/from Cardiff instead of Crewe/Manchester, providing Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner 'WAG Expresses'.

2tph on the Conwy Valley, just wait while I go into fits of laughter.

1tp2h clockface should be achievable, though, and would be very desirable because a properly integrated Snowdon Sherpa bus network would be easier to connect to it at Betws. It could just about be done with one unit with some speed upgrades if it didn't run past the Junction. However, for a through service to Llandudno on present timings I *think* it would need an extra loop.
If you are going clockface every two hours then you would not be maintaining present timings anyway (unless by 'present timings' you mean journey time not the times the trains leave each station). As far as I can tell, with two units you could absolutely do a clockface service every two hours between Llandudno and Blaenau Ffestiniog passing at North Llanrwst although on the timetable I quickly knocked up to prove it to myself the units would be sat idle at each end for 50 minutes. Not sure if the 50 minutes at the Blaenau Ffestiniog end would be enough time to extend to Trawsfynydd.

So they want the Holyhead / Cardiff service to omit Chester, which probably serves as many passengers as the combination of numbers from most of the other stations between Holyhead & Shrewsbury ??
The map shows said services callinng at Shotton. If such a chord is possible, I'd say it would make more sense to divert one of the two Wrexham Central services each hour to somewhere like Rhyl and leave the Cardiff services going to Chester. I'd also put in a single-track north-to-west chord at Shotton (with a platform on the chord) and have a Bidston to Chester service once per hour, so the Borderlands line retains the planned 2tph throughout but with only 1tph between Wrexham and Bidston since the other train on each half would turn off at Shotton.

Bangor to Porthmadog, Trawsfynydd, Amlwch would all be reopenings, not new lines
ISTR the proposal is part new-build at the southern end, following the A487 from Bryncir into Porthmadog rather than taking the detour via Afon Wen.

To be fair, that is described as "possible" which in the context of the other proposals I would translate into English as "even less likely than some of the rest."

That said, Llandudno-Bangor-Caernarfon or variants thereon would be good.

OT - good thing Aberystwyth and Carmarthen aren't in North Wales :)
It does show Criccieth to the west which implies 30907 is correct that the line would be a new route south of Bryncir. I am VERY glad of that, it makes so much more sense to go direct to Porthmadog than to detour via Afon Wen. OT: there is a south Wales map too (please start a new topic, and send me a link, if you want to discuss that); Carmarthen-Aberystwyth doesn't appear.

...a frequent Wrexham - Chester service is again a line with enough demand to sustain a frequent bus service where the train service is limited to only long distance trips...
Rail is in theory stronger on long-distance; buses can stop at every lampost and accelerate back to their (relatively low) top speed than a 90-100mph train. That said, I do think there's potential to do more with Wrexham-Chester. The single track is an issue, with pathing of long-distance trains restricted by having to slot in on busy routes elsewhere. I therefore look at the south-facing bay platforms at Wrexham General and wonder how they could be used; terminating Birmingham and/or Cardiff trains there would allow Chester-Wrexham to be relatively self-contained. You could then put in some points to allow trains from Chester to go into Wrexham Central and/or have Chester to Wrexham services continue to Oswestry. Ideally there would still be 1tph between Chester and Shrewsbury (carrying on to Cardiff or Birmingham), calling at Gobowen, Chirk, Ruabon and Wrexham General, plus three Holyhead-Cardiff expresses each day calling at Wrexham General only.

We've already had the "WAG Express" omitting Hereford (despite finding time to stop at Colwyn Bay etc) - I don't know how much more obvious Cardiff Bay has to make it that they don't care about people living on the "wrong" side of the border.
It didn't always stop at Colwyn Bay. If I recall correctly, originally it stopped at Newport, Shrewsbury, Crewe, Chester, Flint, Rhyl, Llandudno Junction and Bangor only. I think that was a very sensible stopping pattern for an exclusive express (note that Welsh stations Cwmbran and Abergavenny are also missing from the list) and, apart from swapping Crewe for Wrexham General and (maybe) adding Hereford, I would not change that at all. I would however limit it to three trains per day each way with the fast path through north Wales used by a service from Birmingham, Manchester or London in the other hours.

I'd put money on the fact they will want the UK taxpayers to fund it while they get all the benefits.
At the moment yes; since rail infrustructure is not devolved they don't get an allocation of money for rail infrustructure in the block grant. Therefore it is currently the UK Government's responsibility to fund any infrustructure changes. I believe however that the Welsh Government have finally agreed that they want rail infrustructure devolved. If they get that they will get a certain amount of money for that, which may focus minds on what can actually be done within that funding allocation.

Of course, this is what should happen with a clock face 20 minute frequency between Chester and Llandudno Junction. It won’t though, there will be irregular stopping patterns, two trains within 10 minutes and then nothing for 30+ minutes - remember this is TfW.
Don't forget that the north Wales coast line has to compete with a dual carriageway. Google maps gives 52 minutes to drive from Llandudno Junction to Chester; even without the potential two new stations making all trains all-stops could make it difficult to get pepole out of their cars. I think the thing to do depends on whether you build two the new stations. If you do, then I think the Welsh Government's 5tph aspiration isn't too far off the mark if you make it a half-hourly clockface all-stops service between Chester and Llandudo (perhaps 1tph from Crewe and the other from Liverpool) and fit a mix of fast and semi-fast services to Holyhead and Caernarfon between them however you can.

Without Holywell and Broughton stations, the half-hourly clockface all-stops service between Llandudno Junction and Chester becomes one to Holyhead and one to Llandudo. You then add 1tph fast to Holyhead and 1tph semi-fast to Caernarfon for a total of 4tph.

As much as I would love to see your suggestion come to fruition, there simply isn’t the demand for 4 trains per hour all day west of Chester.

What should happen (but won’t politically) is:

Hourly Liverpool - Llandudno
Hourly Manchester - Bangor (Caernarfon)
Every 2 hours London - Holyhead
Every 2 hours Cardiff - Holyhead
Wot, no Birmingham? The problem with limiting it to 3tph is that Abergele & Pensarn and, in particular, Shotton could do with having half-hourly services, but that would make either Holyhead or Caernarfon services slow and unattractive to long-distance passengers. I suppose if you had suitable trains you could make the fast service split at Bangor to serve both Holyhead and Caernarfon, but that still costs a few minutes particularly for one of the two destinations.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top