dk1
Veteran Member
Not sure how things work with the jobs but they're all based at Worcester.
22:00 & 22:30 appear to be running to Great Malvern & Worcester Shrub Hill as booked formed by the aforementioned arrivals.
Not sure how things work with the jobs but they're all based at Worcester.
So it's just the poor22:00 & 22:30 appear to be running to Great Malvern & Worcester Shrub Hill as booked formed by the aforementioned arrivals.
The taxis and buses cost, just like any other business expense are directly put against the any company's tax bill - so effectively cost nothing.
What has to change at all operators, is that when there is a day approaching with major shortages caused by lack of overtime volunteers (ie company not hiring enough staff) is implementation of protective, emergency timetables to ensure all routes have at least an hourly service.
- Dump the day's set of traincrew and unit diagrams, get a driver, get a guard, get a train, and send the train somewhere. This has worked many times before, however the current performance regime dissuades train planners from agreeing to accept defeat and hand the job over to local traincrew management to come up with their own emergency plan. The current situation, in my opinion sees poor use of traincrew and units, and unfair 4-hour service gaps on Route A to sustain a 10 minute service on Route B.
Yup run a timetable you know you can deliver day in day out even if its doesn't deliver what is really desired you can build upto that. On may routes you can deal with capacity by doubling on units ie reduce frequency but add more capacity.Off topic admittedly, but are you saying that advertising a timetable that is realistic and can actually be ran reliably as opposed to one which is reliant entirely on non existent goodwill isn't to be applauded in the current climate?
Which is exactly what TPE have done, and been castigated for. You can please some of the people . . .Yup run a timetable you know you can deliver day in day out even if its doesn't deliver what is really desired you can build upto that. On may routes you can deal with capacity by doubling on units ie reduce frequency but add more capacity.
I suspect it's a nationwide issue.Issue with the herefords is only one depot sign the route & traction. Another depot on the snow hill lines signs the traction but not the route. Can't see it changing either.
Totally correct and I suspect this what we will see Hendy pushing for. He wasn't cautious when he came into NR and hacked into the enhancements programme pretty ruthlessly to stabilise the situation. As long as its short term pain like TPE then it won't have a last impact on ridership. It will also lower extra costs being accrued on ever increasing costs to secure RDW arrangements.Which is exactly what TPE have done, and been castigated for. You can please some of the people . . .
At the risk of going way off topic (but it is relevant) . . . on London Buses in the 1980s there were primary and secondary schedules on many (admittedly high-frequency) routes . . . garages were told to cover the primary duties without fail, and to run the secondary duties if they could. And yes, they were vilified as well, but it did give some certainty as to what was to operate.
If staff availability is really that bad, week in, week out, then reduce your timetable. Protect first and last trains if at all possible, and double up on train lengths if the stations will accept longer trains. The hell with the advertised frequencies and any cancellation penalties in the short term, and advertise the hell out of the reduced timetable, and why it's necessary.
It's sort of logical, really . . .
Totally correct and I suspect this what we will see Hendy pushing for. He wasn't cautious when he came into NR and hacked into the enhancements programme pretty ruthlessly to stabilise the situation. As long as its short term pain like TPE then it won't have a last impact on ridership.
It will also lower extra costs being accrued on ever increasing costs to secure RDW arrangements.
Needs to be a 30% slashing if services all round just so as a timetable can be delivered without recourse to any overtime at all. Passenger revenue is still way down on what it was pre covid.....there needs to be a healthy dose of realism all round.
I think my issue is two fold though, there’s the road transport issue, but the fact there is a lack of competence to even post accurate information on their website. It’s simply unacceptable, and would cost people jobs elsewhere.
Just like a lack of train crew, the social media team and information team is likely short.
The sensible policy - nationwide - would be to permanently change diagrams so that "last trains" are always booked to be worked by crews working in "normal hours" - never overtime.
The sensible policy - nationwide - would be to permanently change diagrams so that "last trains" are always booked to be worked by crews working in "normal hours" - never overtime.
I’ll believe a UK railway that doesn’t depend on a significant degree of traincrew overtime when I see it…
The sensible policy - nationwide - would be to permanently change diagrams so that "last trains" are always booked to be worked by crews working in "normal hours" - never overtime.
Agree, although I would delete the word 'traincrew' - Every job I did on the railway required overtime, whether booking office clerk, parcels clerk, TOPS clerk or Controller!
And Sundays were not in the working week when I joined BR in 1978.... they still were not when I retired in 2016. Not an easy, or cheap, nut to crack.
The only way that would work at this depot would be to introduce an AM/Pm standby turn which would cover the hours of the 1st and the last jobs of the day and cannot be utilised as spares.The sensible policy - nationwide - would be to permanently change diagrams so that "last trains" are always booked to be worked by crews working in "normal hours" - never overtime.
lack of drivers on the depots I believe, primarily Tyseley which meant that units were not prepared, fuelled or brought into service this morning.Today (Fri 26th) had several cancellations on the Snow Hills and apparently on the Shrewsburys, with at one stage virtually every other train between Worcester and Snow Hill cancelled due to train crew issues
From a passenger's point of view the more notice they can get the better. So frustrating to be half way through a two leg journey, arrive at the connecting station and only then see the departures board change to Cancelled. I've had that happen a few times at New Street, if only I'd known earlier I would have made alternative plans.
Even now I'm debating buying a ticket back from Liverpool via Chester instead of via Birmingham for next Saturday. Waste of money if the BHM-HFD trains do run, but am I prepared to take the risk?
Edit: Done it. Not prepared to faff around with replacement buses or expensive last minute hotels.
I had a friend stranded at Worcester Foregate Street last night at about 17:00ish. He was heading to Bromsgrove. No replacement transport and no staff to be seen.Made the right decision today by the seems of it. Everything showing running okay at about 08:00 this morning, but according to National Rail Live Trains there was a whole heap of cancellations from mid afternoon onwards on the BHM-HFD route. At least if they know they can't run the services couldn't they give us a bit more notice?
Edit: Mine was terminated at Worcs Foregate Street, so I would have had to wait there for an hour.
Not for drivers, committed for guardsIs Sunday in the working week for WMR?
Crap diagrams (for staff) and now school holiday season. RDW is always available at this time of year, but if you have kids it's hard to make yourself availableEven committed guards can ditch a Sunday if they give polite notice in advance by a week or three.
Interesting to see that traincrews at WMR still dissatisfied but I am seriously not surprised as former WMR myself. I wonder what has gone on behind closed doors to miff people to the point of ditching RDW?