Fleetmaster
Member
Complementing the Bee Network bus thread, let's speculate an alternate history where GM Buses was never sold....
What if it went the Lothian route, remaining an arms length council owned company? If all other things stayed the same, how would it have proceeded?
Does it stay the same size, or perhaps even expand, or does it rationalise and trim the fat? Does it stay corporate, or go local or even route brand? Does it slash costs or aggressively invest? Does it have good employee relations and the support of the community? Does it create subsidiaries or low cost units? Does it innovate or is it conservative, perhaps even hampered by its sheer size, becomes paralyzed by inertia or the need to serve too many different municipal masters, or worse, the ideology of one very outspoken metro mayor? Or does it prove to be the making of the much maligned Greater Manchester concept, a beacon of their civic pride?
Would it have even survived sustained competition at all? Or does it do even better than Lothian, to the point that the Manchester Standard is a thing again, gleaming in orange and brown, and it does this without the added cost of tendering for routes or garages? It just owns and runs buses, integrated with other modes, consistently returning a tidy dividend to the councils, it's intensively worked route branded urban corridors with their tri-axke 100 seat monster deckers more than enough to subsidize socially necessary services.
I would be so impressed if it could do better than Lothian, but with a modern twist, focusing on route and sector branding, de-emphasising the corporate element. I fear the key factors of geography and too many masters would be the reason it doesn't match Lothian and potentially gets rolled over in short order, or dies a slow agonizing death.
What if it went the Lothian route, remaining an arms length council owned company? If all other things stayed the same, how would it have proceeded?
Does it stay the same size, or perhaps even expand, or does it rationalise and trim the fat? Does it stay corporate, or go local or even route brand? Does it slash costs or aggressively invest? Does it have good employee relations and the support of the community? Does it create subsidiaries or low cost units? Does it innovate or is it conservative, perhaps even hampered by its sheer size, becomes paralyzed by inertia or the need to serve too many different municipal masters, or worse, the ideology of one very outspoken metro mayor? Or does it prove to be the making of the much maligned Greater Manchester concept, a beacon of their civic pride?
Would it have even survived sustained competition at all? Or does it do even better than Lothian, to the point that the Manchester Standard is a thing again, gleaming in orange and brown, and it does this without the added cost of tendering for routes or garages? It just owns and runs buses, integrated with other modes, consistently returning a tidy dividend to the councils, it's intensively worked route branded urban corridors with their tri-axke 100 seat monster deckers more than enough to subsidize socially necessary services.
I would be so impressed if it could do better than Lothian, but with a modern twist, focusing on route and sector branding, de-emphasising the corporate element. I fear the key factors of geography and too many masters would be the reason it doesn't match Lothian and potentially gets rolled over in short order, or dies a slow agonizing death.