• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

what locomotives are approved for use in the Channel Tunnel and HS1?

Status
Not open for further replies.

popeter45

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2019
Messages
1,307
Location
london
as the Title says what trains both UK and Continental have the required signalling and are approved to traverse the Channel tunnel?, apart from the maintenance trains all i can think of are the class 9000's, class 92's as well as the eurostar 373's and 374, do SNCF or and other continental railway companies have rolling stock that can use it?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

FOH

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2013
Messages
743
SNCF BB22200 locos used to be used, no idea if they remain certified.
 
Last edited:

themiller

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,252
Location
Cumbria, UK
Were these the ones that hauled the Postal TGV up to St Pancras a few years ago?
No, those were the locos that operated the shuttles until the class 92s were in service. The ones that hauled the TGV were Eurotunnel class 0001 Maks.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,734
Location
Between Beeston (Notts) & Bedlington
Alstom's Prima II and Siemens' Vectron were also tested in the Channel Tunnel back in 2012/2013 respectively.


Interestingly, the Vectron only needs fitment of TVM and Channel Tunnel-cleared pantographs in order to use the tunnel, according to Siemens. However, homologation for the Vectron (Baureihe 193) in France is not expected until 2024.

Meanwhile, the Prima II has been a bit of a damp squib for Alstom, with Morocco's ONCF being the sole customer for the type.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
17,001
Alstom's Prima II and Siemens' Vectron were also tested in the Channel Tunnel back in 2012/2013 respectively.


Interestingly, the Vectron only needs fitment of TVM and Channel Tunnel-cleared pantographs in order to use the tunnel, according to Siemens. However, homologation for the Vectron (Baureihe 193) in France is not expected until 2024.

Meanwhile, the Prima II has been a bit of a damp squib for Alstom, with Morocco's ONCF being the sole customer for the type.
Alstom's Prima has been singularly unsuccessful in Europe outside France in both its incarnations. Bombardier and Siemens have all but cleaned up the electric loco market with Siemens now having built or have orders for around 1,000 Vectrons.
 

popeter45

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2019
Messages
1,307
Location
london
Trafikverket is working on time tables for 2021 and the applications have now been made public. Snälltåget has not applied for any trains to Trelleborg (and the ferries) for 2021 but instead for trains to Pepparholmen (i.e. Denmark). So it seems like the last two passenger train ferries in northern Europe are gone.

They have also applied for capacity for a much longer period:
20210405-20210609 twice weekly
20210611-20210904 daily
20210906-20211003 twice weekly
And in addition a couple of other trains during the rest of the year during Christmas/New Year/December/Easter etc.

And it seems like they also plan to run direct night trains Stockholm-Berlin a few times during the summer.
Alstom's Prima II and Siemens' Vectron were also tested in the Channel Tunnel back in 2012/2013 respectively.


Interestingly, the Vectron only needs fitment of TVM and Channel Tunnel-cleared pantographs in order to use the tunnel, according to Siemens. However, homologation for the Vectron (Baureihe 193) in France is not expected until 2024.

Meanwhile, the Prima II has been a bit of a damp squib for Alstom, with Morocco's ONCF being the sole customer for the type.

Vectron could really be useful, if the Multi-system version is used then could remove need to replace loco once on French side for trips beyond to Germany and beyond, also 200km/h would be nice when timetabling
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
17,001
Vectron could really be useful, if the Multi-system version is used then could remove need to replace loco once on French side for trips beyond to Germany and beyond, also 200km/h would be nice when timetabling
Timetabling what? You're not seriously thinking loco-hauled passenger trains are going to run through the tunnel are you?
 

popeter45

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2019
Messages
1,307
Location
london
Timetabling what? You're not seriously thinking loco-hauled passenger trains are going to run through the tunnel are you?
no i mean timing of freight in the early morning when high speed passenger services will be starting to run, no need to wait in passing loops or slowing down passenger services behind it
 

themiller

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,252
Location
Cumbria, UK
It's unlikely that a loco-hauled service train could be accommodated at St Pancras unless it was top and tailed.
no i mean timing of freight in the early morning when high speed passenger services will be starting to run, no need to wait in passing loops or slowing down passenger services behind it
I don't think any freight stock is allowed to run at 200kph!
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
5,694
I don't think any freight stock is allowed to run at 200kph!

Look up SNCF MVGV200 on YouTube. Very little footage as it ran overnight around ten to fifteen years ago but what footage there is, is great. I think modified nez cassés hauled them on the LGV Sud-Est.
 

themiller

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,252
Location
Cumbria, UK
Look up SNCF MVGV200 on YouTube. Very little footage as it ran overnight around ten to fifteen years ago but what footage there is, is great. I think modified nez cassés hauled them on the LGV Sud-Est.
I think that, for higher speeds, secondary suspension is required on the freight wagons. This would increase costs (both capital and maintenance) which may not be sustainable in the current market.
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
5,694
I think that, for higher speeds, secondary suspension is required on the freight wagons. This would increase costs (both capital and maintenance) which may not be sustainable in the current market.

I think SNCF took the braking design from 200kmh capable Corail stock for the wagons.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
6,084
Location
Yorkshire
Haven't they sent a 319 to France before?

319008 'Cheriton' and 319009 'Coquelles' travelled on 10/12/93 with an invited party of guests, and went again for the Folkestone 1994 Event 0n 07/05/94 with paying members of public. The pantographs had to be modified prior to the runs though to account for the higher OHLE.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,309
Haven't they sent a 319 to France before?

From what I have read, it sounds like it was very much a “special occasion” and would not be permissible under normal working.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
4,107
Location
SW London
You're not seriously thinking loco-hauled passenger trains are going to run through the tunnel are you?

The original plans included loco-hauled sleeper services such as Manchester to Paris and London to Cologne. Haulage through the tunnel would have been Class 92. The rolling stock was built, and is now in Canada.
 

delticdave

Member
Joined
14 Apr 2017
Messages
449
I think that, for higher speeds, secondary suspension is required on the freight wagons. This would increase costs (both capital and maintenance) which may not be sustainable in the current market.

I own an HO scale model (Jouef) of these wagons & the bogie detail shows primary & secondary suspension + disc brakes.
 

AndyCK

Member
Joined
25 Apr 2019
Messages
43
The original plans included loco-hauled sleeper services such as Manchester to Paris and London to Cologne. Haulage through the tunnel would have been Class 92. The rolling stock was built, and is now in Canada.

I had no idea this was proposed at one time! From Wikipedia:


The Nightstar was a proposed overnight sleeper service from various parts of United Kingdom to continental Europe, via the Channel Tunnel. To run alongside the Eurostar and north of London day-time Regional Eurostar services, the Nightstar was the last part in a round-the-clock passenger train utilisation of the Channel Tunnel.

The Nightstar service was to have been operated by European Night Services, a company mostly owned by European Passenger Services (the then-named operator of the Eurostar service).[1]

After rejection of various British ideas for the service that was to become the British Rail Class 373 Eurostar train—which eventually was created from the existing French TGV scaled for a British loading gauge—the Nightstar concept emerged as an individual locomotive-hauled passenger train. While some carriages were built, the project was cancelled in 1997 for lack of commercial viability. Some of the stock was eventually sold to Canada, where it became Via Rail's Renaissance train fleet.
 

delticdave

Member
Joined
14 Apr 2017
Messages
449
I had no idea this was proposed at one time! From Wikipedia:


ISTR that 5/6 37's + 3 Mk. 3's converted to generator cars were going to be used on the Diesel-hauled segments of the "provincial" Nightstars & 92's through the tunnel. I've seen pix of a 16 car Nightstar rake on test in Belgium, with 2 e-loks, one to pull the train & the trailing loco providing Head End Power.

VIA Rail Canada eventually purchased the entire fleet, approx 60 complete coaches, all the bodyshels & bogies + 500 containers of components. They are /(were?) used in Eastern Canada on the overnight trains between Montreal & Halifax, & inter-city trains from Montreal to Quebec City / Ottawa. I've had 1 trip each on the inter-city routes, using the 2+1 day-nighter seating cars + a baggage-car built in Canada from sleeping car shells. The difference in UK & N.American loading gauges is quite noticeable.........
 

themiller

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,252
Location
Cumbria, UK
ISTR that 5/6 37's + 3 Mk. 3's converted to generator cars were going to be used on the Diesel-hauled segments of the "provincial" Nightstars & 92's through the tunnel. I've seen pix of a 16 car Nightstar rake on test in Belgium, with 2 e-loks, one to pull the train & the trailing loco providing Head End Power.

VIA Rail Canada eventually purchased the entire fleet, approx 60 complete coaches, all the bodyshels & bogies + 500 containers of components. They are /(were?) used in Eastern Canada on the overnight trains between Montreal & Halifax, & inter-city trains from Montreal to Quebec City / Ottawa. I've had 1 trip each on the inter-city routes, using the 2+1 day-nighter seating cars + a baggage-car built in Canada from sleeping car shells. The difference in UK & N.American loading gauges is quite noticeable.........
http://kentrail.org.uk/class_37_6_eps.htm shows photos of some of the class 37/6s in EPS (European Passenger Services) 'colours'. 37/6s were also used for hauling class 373 Eurostar sets before they were accepted and put into service. DRS bought at least some of them.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
17,001
http://kentrail.org.uk/class_37_6_eps.htm shows photos of some of the class 37/6s in EPS (European Passenger Services) 'colours'. 37/6s were also used for hauling class 373 Eurostar sets before they were accepted and put into service. DRS bought at least some of them.
There were 12 converted, 37601-612 and DRS bought all of them in three stages (37607-612, then 37602/605/606 and finally 37601/603/604).
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
6,084
Location
Yorkshire
http://kentrail.org.uk/class_37_6_eps.htm shows photos of some of the class 37/6s in EPS (European Passenger Services) 'colours'. 37/6s were also used for hauling class 373 Eurostar sets before they were accepted and put into service. DRS bought at least some of them.

This is probably going to sound a stupid question, but I've noticed alongside the grey Class 92s, they have those three rings on the outside. Was that a logo of sorts or did it signify something?
 

themiller

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,252
Location
Cumbria, UK
This is probably going to sound a stupid question, but I've noticed alongside the grey Class 92s, they have those three rings on the outside. Was that a logo of sorts or did it signify something?
They were supposed to represent the tunnel segments as the train passed through the tunnel. The 37/6s had them as well.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
6,084
Location
Yorkshire
They were supposed to represent the tunnel segments as the train passed through the tunnel. The 37/6s had them as well.

Ahh fair enough - thanks for that! I think the generator vans for the planned Nightstar?? train had them too IIRC.
 

popeter45

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2019
Messages
1,307
Location
london
Ahh fair enough - thanks for that! I think the generator vans for the planned Nightstar?? train had them too IIRC.
i believe some went to heritage railways for heating and i believe the Generator Vans for the Irish Enterprise train are also ex-Nightstar
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
6,084
Location
Yorkshire
i believe some went to heritage railways for heating and i believe the Generator Vans for the Irish Enterprise train are also ex-Nightstar

And of course the one that now permanently resides at Doncaster Works/West Yard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top