x.com

This teaser trailer for Newcastle United's new away kit stars a number of Regional Railways-liveried Pacers rolling through the countryside. Where'd they find these, do they belong to a heritage site?
It’s the Aln Valley Railways 144004 - the slightly too thin blue stripe and location are the give aways.
The “fleximark”/“linking device” should be dark blue on rolling stock.The corporate identity guide reproduced on doublearrow.co.uk makes this clear: http://www.doublearrow.co.uk/sheets/RR_2005.gifIt's interesting that both of the ones I know of have errors in the livery - the Wensleydale's one has the "device" at the end with the wrong line thickness, they are supposed to be equally thick white and black lines but the black is thinner - and I think the font isn't quite right too.
The “fleximark”/“linking device” should be dark blue on rolling stock.The corporate identity guide reproduced on doublearrow.co.uk makes this clear: http://www.doublearrow.co.uk/sheets/RR_2005.gif
It’s even more surprising when the detail is there, freely available. More excusable where the livery drawings aren’t available.Sorry, dark blue, I just remembered wrong. But the link you provide shows that the blue and white lines should be the same width, and on the Wensleydale's unit they aren't, the blue is thinner.
Just surprised preservationists would make an error like that.
It’s the Aln Valley Railways 144004 - the slightly too thin blue stripe and location are the give aways.
It's advertising the new away strip so it leaves 'Newcastle Central' for an unspecified away destination - not Newcastle.Amused by the toilet being the cab!. And also a train to Newcastle starting at, er, Newcastle!
Presumably it being a 6-car set is editing?
Correct.Presumably it being a 6-car set is editing?
It was also filmed there too, as Greenrigg Halt is very recognisable.It’s the Aln Valley Railways 144004 - the slightly too thin blue stripe and location are the give aways.
Correct.
As the station announcement says just before the train arrives on screen: "Platform 9 for the 6:45 from Newcastle Central Station."
Yes that is quite a good edit, just a second or two and it probably is AI, but a good use of it for a quick job where nobody is looking for the uncanny valley "tells".Quite a good job given that they've managed to turn it into a 6 car set at the station with the bloke stood there! (I get that the one where it's just going straight across the screen would be quite easy to do even with a rudimentary editing package). Perhaps modern AI based video editing is better than I thought!
If we're on the subject of nitpicking inaccuracies, 144004 never wore Regional Railways livery under BR, only 011 and 012 did. They also didn't get as far north as Newcastle very often, if ever.Sorry, dark blue, I just remembered wrong. But the link you provide shows that the blue and white lines should be the same width, and on the Wensleydale's unit they aren't, the blue is thinner.
Just surprised preservationists would make an error like that.
Sorry, dark blue, I just remembered wrong. But the link you provide shows that the blue and white lines should be the same width, and on the Wensleydale's unit they aren't, the blue is thinner.
Just surprised preservationists would make an error like that.
The dark blue 'fleximark' stripes always did look thinner than the white, though, on the class 143s, right from the first set being outshopped from Doncaster in the livery in 1991. This side on view at Bristol Temple Meads illustrates it best (yes, the link is correct):It’s even more surprising when the detail is there, freely available. More excusable where the livery drawings aren’t available.
The dark blue 'fleximark' stripes always did look thinner than the white, though, on the class 143s, right from the first set being outshopped from Doncaster in the livery in 1991. This side on view at Bristol Temple Meads illustrates it best (yes, the link is correct):
View attachment 16371219442491 - Online Store
Find Quality Clothing, Furniture, Toys & Baby Products and Sports Merchandise for Men and Women!bestedenmk.shop
I've now taken a ruler to the fleximarks in close up on a few images of RR 143s back in the day and, allowing for the limitations of image quality, the white stripes uniformly seem to be around 1.4 times the thickness of the dark blue. Admittedly, by the same method on suitable photos, the variation between the two on 143623 as running today is rather greater than that.They look the same thickness to me, whereas the Wensleydale's is obviously wrong.
And 013, purely for completeness and not detracting from your original point.If we're on the subject of nitpicking inaccuracies, 144004 never wore Regional Railways livery under BR, only 011 and 012 did.
Thanks... could try and claim that was a typo, but it was a genuine error!And 013, purely for completeness and not detracting from your original point.
Easily overlooked, as you say there weren't many of them in RR livery.Thanks... could try and claim that was a typo, but it was a genuine error!
Warning: Pedantic linguist inboundThat kind of has the feel of being inspired by Trenuleţul, the Moldovan Eurovision entry from a few years back. Wonder if it was?
It’s the Aln Valley Railways 144004 - the slightly too thin blue stripe and location are the give aways.
Warning: Pedantic linguist inbound
That's technically the wrong diacritic on the second T; it should be an diacritical comma, not a cedilla, thus: Trenulețul
End of Pedantic Linguist alert
Dearie me, an unforgivable error on their part! Though that is likely due to YouTube not supporting all Unicode glyphs.I just copy-pasted it from their YouTube video, so the artists themselves have made that mistake, not me!