- Joined
- 13 Dec 2018
- Messages
- 4,125
Interestingly one heritage railway had a day with two Deltics and took the most money in tickets it had ever taken in one day! Locos like Deltics do still attract the general public, when one visited locally my uncle asked about it and when it was running, I didn't know he had any interest in railways!I'm saying that to the public at large, a steam locomotive is an exciting attraction, a piece of history, an exciting working industrial machine. A "noisy vibrating smelly box" is what they often find is delayed when they're waiting for the 0745 to local-town. Most people don't care about Deltics and thrash. To them there are "steam trains" and "others", the "others" still being about the place and often being delayed and overcrowded and a bit crap.
If we'd had widespread electrification I can see people getting excited about diesel traction, but given it is how most regional services are provided it just isn't that interesting? You and I might know that a 195 and a 101 are generations apart but the experience isn't wildly different. Likewise a Deltic or a 37 hauling some Mk3s isn't dissimilar to EMR or LNER or GWR within the last 15 years rattling as part of a IC125 - hardly worth travelling for. (Hell, if you lived on the Cumbrian coast line it was just part of life a few years ago...)
Diesels are fine, I guess, if you're into that, but I can see why heritage (again, read "Steam") Railways don't actively promote "relive the railway of 2015" - the all-in "1950s" experience of well-staffed stations, vintage outfits and alike is simply a much more compelling event to sell premium tickets for.
They have a historical value in terms of the British Railway, but they aren't yet novel - why would I pay premium for a day out on a train which isn't notably different to my local commute? I want the magic, the steam, the sense of a different era.
I'm not saying that's correct, I'm just saying that I imagine that is a very common viewpoint. Steam trains are a unique and historical - a noisy smelly box of vibrations is the daily commute.
And, again, I reiterate that I'm sure when the first heritage railways opened a lot of people were saying the same thing then - that steam trains are noisy and horrible and smelly and why would anyone want to experience that? Give it 50 years and a rolling electrification programme and diesel might be something exciting. But until then, you're trying to sell "remember your commute a while back? Here it is again but now it costs you more as a day out!" which is probably a harder sell than showing your kids a steam engine - with its seemingly instant personality and engineering wizardry on full show - chugging about the place.
Having said that it's turning into a steam vs diesel debate, which is not how this started. It's about promoting heritage diesel traction not replacing steam. I doubt anyone on here would say diesel will ever be more popular than steam but if promoted properly heritage diesels are an added attraction at the Railway. You don't see Alton Towers apologising for some of their rides so why do certain staff at heritage railways put down the product they're offering?