• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

15X and 16X multiple working

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

penguin8967

Member
Joined
21 Aug 2020
Messages
133
Location
South West
Looks like possibly some incorrect information must have been entered into the system as in reality it is impossible for a 150 / 166 combination to work together in multiple.
Aren't they able to couple mechanically but not electrically?
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,363
Aren't they able to couple mechanically but not electrically?

For emergency/recovery purposes only - 5mph max, unbraked.

Not a safe/acceptable method of operating even for a relatively short shunt move onto Exeter TMD

5T04 is scheduled to be 2x 166 - presumably on the 19th one was unavailable/displaced and substituted by 2x 150. While the diagrams (and therefore the allocations fed into RTT) show them coming off together, they would have been brought off separately by local arrangement
 

321over360

Member
Joined
17 Jul 2015
Messages
199
It is also worth mentioning that the 150/158 and 165/166 have different Guard operation methods which makes it impossible to run them coupled in passenger service even if the coupling wiring issues are solved. On the 150/158 it is the Guard who releases the doors. On the 165/166 it is the Driver who releases the doors. So they would have to standardise their Guard door control methods and have the Guard release doors on all of these classes to enable them to run coupled in passenger service.
If the 165/166 setup is anything like a 465/466 setup then there is a key slot a guard can use for them to be able to release the doors using the controls within the cab, as the key used to open the cab door leading to the passenger compartment on 465s can be used to control the doors on the train like a driver would if their key was in
 

penguin8967

Member
Joined
21 Aug 2020
Messages
133
Location
South West
5T04 is scheduled to be 2x 166 - presumably on the 19th one was unavailable/displaced and substituted by 2x 150. While the diagrams (and therefore the allocations fed into RTT) show them coming off together, they would have been brought off separately by local arrangement
That makes much more sense then - thanks for clarifying.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,657
If the 165/166 setup is anything like a 465/466 setup then there is a key slot a guard can use for them to be able to release the doors using the controls within the cab, as the key used to open the cab door leading to the passenger compartment on 465s can be used to control the doors on the train like a driver would if their key was in
It isn't. Class 465 and 466 have been dual driver and guard door operation since their introduction.

Class 165 and 166 until they were modified had entirely driver controlled doors, with the guard relaying their directions through the signal bell/buzzer. The guard didn't open or close doors themselves until the recent changes.
 

CR165022

Member
Joined
12 Nov 2019
Messages
717
Location
Buckinghamshire

busestrains

On Moderation
Joined
9 Sep 2022
Messages
788
Location
Salisbury
Just spotted this, a 158 in the middle of 2 165s, not sure if it's an error with realtime trains though
I think it has been mentioned that 150/158 coupled with 165/166 does happen on ECS moves. It is just not allowed in passenger service. So that formation is probably correct as it is an ECS working.
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,363
I think it has been mentioned that 150/158 coupled with 165/166 does happen on ECS moves. It is just not allowed in passenger service. So that formation is probably correct as it is an ECS working.

Per post 36, It does not happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top