MK Tom
Established Member
Still only 9tpd on the Marston Vale line in the December-May LNWR timetable, the rest replaced by buses.
At least Marston Vale (and Abbey Line when applicable) get rail replacement buses - express and all stations. Here in the land of the forgotten (East Midlands Railway) we just have to suck it up on reduced services. On my local line just 60% service currently plus a couple of peak buses running part route, 80% service from December until who knows when.Still only 9tpd on the Marston Vale line in the December-May LNWR timetable, the rest replaced by buses.
That won't ever return, and it never really properly started, it was more of a trial.Not seeing a return of 3tph on the North Downs line though. Seems that was an experimental phase for GWR!
Quit thenThat’s cool if you enjoy it mate. Id rather be a piss head myself on a Saturday night. We work enough antisocial shifts without having to endure more when there’s no need.
Or, just don’t put yourself available to work a rest day on a Saturday late turn if you don’t want to?Quit then
We are talking about overtime not booked turns.Quit then
Exactly.Or, just don’t put yourself available to work a rest day on a Saturday late turn if you don’t want to?
It is a shame they can't put the North Downs timetable back to the sides of the hour it successfully operated to for over 25 years (which fits better with the commuting patterns at Guildford and East Surrey) and remove the unnecessary dwells in the stopping services at Guildford.That won't ever return, and it never really properly started, it was more of a trial.
Yeah of course, that ol' chestnut.Not seeing a return of 3tph on the North Downs line though. Seems that was an experimental phase for GWR!
No it won't. It has been withdrawn as an aspiration by GWR in their last track access application. Some attempt will be made instead to extend the Redhill stopping service to Gatwick (but not in December 2021).Yeah of course, that ol' chestnut.
I have a feeling 3tph on the North Downs will appear properly if (yes, if) the 769s start running in service at some point in the next century
Good to know, cheersNo it won't. It has been withdrawn as an aspiration by GWR in their last track access application. Some attempt will be made instead to extend the Redhill stopping service to Gatwick.
Glad I did it when I had a chance.No it won't. It has been withdrawn as an aspiration by GWR in their last track access application. Some attempt will be made instead to extend the Redhill stopping service to Gatwick (but not in December 2021).
I couldn't agree more. The old time was 17.50 or more recently, 17.49 for the stopper from Guildford to Redhill. This is much more convenient for commuting when work finishes at 17.30. The new time is 18.13 although the train could depart at 18.07. The result is that the new timetable puts an extra 23 minutes on arrival time home (for me).It is a shame they can't put the North Downs timetable back to the sides of the hour it successfully operated to for over 25 years (which fits better with the commuting patterns at Guildford and East Surrey) and remove the unnecessary dwells in the stopping services at Guildford.
I couldn't agree more. The old time was 17.50 or more recently, 17.49 for the stopper from Guildford to Redhill. This is much more convenient for commuting when work finishes at 17.30. The new time is 18.13 although the train could depart at 18.07. The result is that the new timetable puts an extra 23 minutes on arrival time home (for me).
GWR looks to be running a full service, similar to the Dec 19, except of course the Superfast services to/from Bristol TM. Are there any others missing? Luckily the services most important to me (S. Wales - London going back to 2tph, and 1C01 0545 Paddington - Bristol TM) are returning
So there is still an incentive for companies to increase rail fares and keep them higher as opposed to running a service that benefits the patterns of the travelling public.Whats in the franchise is irrelevant now as its what the govt wants them to run but i suspect its just a cut and paste into the EMA so probably still in there and as GTR get a mgt fee on costs expended the more the better.
I would prefer the trains to be at the opposite times as it means you couldn't try a fast SWT train from Guilford, to Clapham Junction followed 4vor 5 minutes later by a direct train to Gatwick Airport and then neither for another hour.It is a shame they can't put the North Downs timetable back to the sides of the hour it successfully operated to for over 25 years (which fits better with the commuting patterns at Guildford and East Surrey) and remove the unnecessary dwells in the stopping services at Guildford.
Case in point is that GWR have to run an out of cycle 0626 Reading to Gatwick and return service using a unit that would otherwise be spare to deal with a school flow between Redhill, Reigate and Dorking that would fit in the standard patterns if they were on the other side of the hour as they traditionally were.
I haven't been through all the pages, so apologies if already mentioned. The last Abbey Flyer, Monday to Friday will be starting at Euston in passenger service at 21.10.Straight to Watford for the 21.33,I believe this is so the units can be swapped every day. This will mean the toilets can be opened on this service.
As a guard that works this route, I can see problems down the line, adding an extra driver and guard for the last trip onto already tight diagrams, in my opinion is not a good idea.
GTR don't take ticket revenue risk but will be delighted to add some more operating costs to the bottom line which they earn a fee on.So there is still an incentive for companies to increase rail fares and keep them higher as opposed to running a service that benefits the patterns of the travelling public.
I am assuming running the Gatwick Express in this way will bring in more revenue than not, otherwise, why do it.
That is certainly an unusual service (maybe as a "look you now have a direct train from London" PR spin). I suspect most nights it will end up getting cancelled, or run ECS from London to Watford where it will either re-enter traffic at Watford for the run to St Albans, or cancelled outright with a minibus on demand.
(I can see it being a bit popular with track bashers, at least in the first couple weeks, to get the connection from the mainline into platform 11)
But won't they have operating costs whether it is a Gatwick Express or Southern branded service? ( As opposed to the branded trains).GTR don't take ticket revenue risk but will be delighted to add some more operating costs to the bottom line which they earn a fee on.
I don't think it affects them. There aren't any 'Not Gatwick Express' fares that don't have an 'Any Permitted' fare at the same rate.feel there's gonna be some confusion for a while regarding the gx thing. Brighton passengers have been used to red trains to Victoria under Southern for ages soooo
GTR don't take ticket revenue risk but will be delighted to add some more operating costs to the bottom line which they earn a fee on.
I think it was cited elsewhere that there won't be a return to LNR running 3tph to Birmingham. Running unnecessary trains just for people to use cheaper LNR only tickets isn't great economics for the railway as a whole.I hope this is a temporary change as it makes journey times from the south WCML to Birmingham far longer for those who wish to use the cheaper LNR only tickets.
Yeah, but what about 2tph?I think it was cited elsewhere that there won't be a return to LNR running 3tph to Birmingham. Running unnecessary trains just for people to use cheaper LNR only tickets isn't great economics for the railway as a whole.
There are still two trains an hour from Northampton to Birmingham in the December timetable and therefore still two LNR-only connections from London to Birmingham, one involving a change of trains.Yeah, but what about 2tph?
No, I meant 2tph from London Euston to Birmingham New Street direct LNWR.There are still two trains an hour from Northampton to Birmingham in the December timetable and therefore still two LNR-only connections from London to Birmingham, one involving a change of trains.
What's the issue with these two lines (nowhere near me)? Is it shortage of stock or staff? Perhaps conversion of the Abbey Line to light rail was a good idea after all! On Marston Vale do the 230s still not work properly?At least Marston Vale (and Abbey Line when applicable) get rail replacement buses - express and all stations. Here in the land of the forgotten (East Midlands Railway) we just have to suck it up on reduced services. On my local line just 60% service currently plus a couple of peak buses running part route, 80% service from December until who knows when.