Skymonster
Established Member
- Joined
- 7 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 1,774
Interesting interaction between a customer (not me) and EMR on Facebook today…
The statement “not to mention… the additional expense of actually still getting to my destination” in the second panel and the cusotmer wanting a refund would seem to imply that the passenger bought another ticket or traveled by another means (OK, edge case paid a route excess). Notwithstanding the customer used Trainline (I’m not really her to discuss TL’s refund policy even though it might not be right in this situation either), on the basis of the inference, it seems refund would be the correct approach rather than EMR directly prompting the customer just to use Delay Repay (or at least ask additional questions first). I’m really not sure that this is straightforward good advice, and indeed if used by customers who elect not to travel when a train is cancelled could lay the foundation for other issues that have been discussed here in the past.
The statement “not to mention… the additional expense of actually still getting to my destination” in the second panel and the cusotmer wanting a refund would seem to imply that the passenger bought another ticket or traveled by another means (OK, edge case paid a route excess). Notwithstanding the customer used Trainline (I’m not really her to discuss TL’s refund policy even though it might not be right in this situation either), on the basis of the inference, it seems refund would be the correct approach rather than EMR directly prompting the customer just to use Delay Repay (or at least ask additional questions first). I’m really not sure that this is straightforward good advice, and indeed if used by customers who elect not to travel when a train is cancelled could lay the foundation for other issues that have been discussed here in the past.