Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
One of them is in place, albeit not working yet.
Horrid, horrid clutter. They clear it out, then they fill it with obstructions again.
Could removing the location of the main one count as a listed buillding offence?
One of them is in place, albeit not working yet.
I don't think there's anything wrong with the location of the displays at New St, and I'm sure in due course they'll be replaced by colour ones. The layout is otherwise the same.
Yes, if the building was listed and the main one was in the description. It’s not listed because it’s Euston. Only the old systems are listed, eg Earls Court, and that was not working for a long time.Could removing the location of the main one count as a listed buillding offence?
Agreed. Just replace the existing board with the new colour style board.Horrid, horrid clutter. They clear it out, then they fill it with obstructions again.
Could removing the location of the main one count as a listed buillding offence?
I'm fairly sure this used to happen under Virgin. Fairly sure the inward working had the relevant information on the train crew diagram to allow them to get the train setup for its next working.This is a good point. Reservations could be downloaded after the last stop rather than waiting to Euston.
St Pancras is a disgrace full stop. Everything miles apart from each other, ridiculous operation of the escalators up to EMR (and awkward staff when you get there), better signage for the shops than the actual railway facilities and the fact that everything is impossible to find because it's been designed as a shopping centre with railway platforms in it rather than the reverse. Though rants like that should be saved for another thread, I'll admit.The departure boards at St Pancras are an absolute disgrace for what is arguably the country’s flagship station. There isn’t even a clock showing the time to the second!
Surprised they are spending money at Euston before looking at St Pancras.
I agree.. The orange LED ones "matched" with my brain, and at a glance I could find what I wanted to know, even without stopping walking. The new ones are just so counter-intuitive and I have to actively read the text (whereas before I recognised the information without having to make conscious effort). I have good eyesight too !Surely I can’t be the only one who finds these tacky multi-coloured new boards at Victoria harder to read than the orange LED ones? I think they look a mess. A sea of bright fluorescent colours on which the text doesn’t show up hugely well… and I speak as someone with good eyesight.
For a London terminal, the EMR side of St. Pancras is embarrassingly poor. Regarding its PIS, the white LED text is so small.St Pancras is a disgrace full stop. Everything miles apart from each other, ridiculous operation of the escalators up to EMR (and awkward staff when you get there), better signage for the shops than the actual railway facilities
Is the change of location something to do with HS2 and the station redevelopment?I don’t get why they don’t just replace the current ones with these new style ones instead of completely changing the location of it?
Bit early for that. Though it could be considered as a test for when that does happenIs the change of location something to do with HS2 and the station redevelopment?
Move them to St Pancras where something different is desperately needed.If it is an abject failure I wonder what they'll do with their £1.5m toys? Not admit they were wrong, or move them to e.g. Paddington to update those, as Paddington already has that layout?
The screens themselves can presumably be remounted where the current boards are.If it is an abject failure I wonder what they'll do with their £1.5m toys? Not admit they were wrong, or move them to e.g. Paddington to update those, as Paddington already has that layout?
The screens themselves can presumably be remounted where the current boards are.
So the new screens can only show six full sized departures whereas the old ones can show 13+...
Another observation is that the destination 'Avanti' appears in the 'next fastest train' section twice.The new departure boards are now switched on. Observations:
1. Both old and (part) of the new boards are in use
2. Only the inner face of the boards is in use. I assume this will change as otherwise you will have to zig-zag via the middle of the concourse to see the departure boards
3. Fewer train services are shown on the new boards compared to the old board
4. Look at the photo I took from the mezzanine level that shows which board passengers were looking at. No-one is looking at the new boards, everyone seems to be looking at the old one!
I am not convinced these boards are a good idea. They spoil the openness of the concourse, and passengers don’t appear to be using them. Why not simply replace the existing departure board with the new style one?
Computer modelling has taken place to analyse how shifting passengers’ focus from the front to the centre of the concourse can improve people flow at the West Coast main line’s London terminus.
But over the coming months this will be tested live when the new screens are put into action for trials.
State-of-the-art LIDAR cameras will monitor passenger movements in real time and the data collected will be studied to see how repositioning the boards affects the routes people take between the concourse and trains.
Further banks of the same electronic passenger information screens are also due to be put up outside of the station on the piazza in early 2023.
Flow modelling is an established science - and generally gives accurate results - they haven't decided to do this on a whim.
I have to say it's the wrong place for someone's little experiments. Perhaps trials that are close to a poor GCSE project should take place at somewhere like Sugar Loaf (Powys) where there is no impact on passengers in a major, class one station - trials which should occur before the rollout of an expensive system thatThis is a trial
Are these screens owned or leased? That is, if this is a failure have Network Rail spent £1.5m on a pup?
However people who use the station and work there on a daily basis often have insights into behaviour that models don't.