JohnMcL7
Member
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2018
- Messages
- 864
The Chalfont/Latimer one was of particular interest as I'd followed it developing on the forum here and it's quite fascinating because unlike older incidents, the safety systems and technology worked perfectly but still there was almost a crash. I was watching an air crash investigation where the pilots made what appeared to be a stupid mistake therefore it could simply be put down to pilot error but of course there was a lot more to it and it turned out that although the pilots were flying within their legal flight times they were too tired for the flight and had made stupid mistakes.
With regards to the discussion on near misses vs accidents I agree with your points about near misses being just as valid, the one that comes to mind which I hope will be covered on the podcast at some point is the near miss with the CS 92 which couldn't brake sufficiently coming into Waverley station and ran through the station. Reading through the RAIB report gave a lot of insight into how the 92's and Mk5's function and it gave quite a shocking view of what could have happened if the 92 hadn't managed to run through the station. I read many of the RAIB reports but as a non-railway person I don't always understand all the railway specific detail so I appreciate the podcast to explain them
With regards to the discussion on near misses vs accidents I agree with your points about near misses being just as valid, the one that comes to mind which I hope will be covered on the podcast at some point is the near miss with the CS 92 which couldn't brake sufficiently coming into Waverley station and ran through the station. Reading through the RAIB report gave a lot of insight into how the 92's and Mk5's function and it gave quite a shocking view of what could have happened if the 92 hadn't managed to run through the station. I read many of the RAIB reports but as a non-railway person I don't always understand all the railway specific detail so I appreciate the podcast to explain them