During the recent Salford derailment my train was cancelled so I decided not to travel and attempted to obtain a full immediate refund as soon as I could do so from a Northern ticket office under section 26(a) of the NRCoC. I will readily admit that my journey commenced at an unstaffed station and I travelled slightly later and on a different route with a brand new ticket and the Northern ticket office was the first one I encountered, however none of this was used as reasoning for not refunding me.
An immediate refund was refused solely because my ticket was purchased from the East Coast website and, apparently, that ticket office never gives immediate refunds for internet tickets even if bought through the Northern website and any refund has to be claimed back from the original purchase point even during delay/cancellation.
Northern's own passenger charter however states that immediate refunds due to delay or cancellation can be claimed "regardless of the ticket type or where it was bought".
A complaint to Northern rail resulted in "wherever possible" in 26(a) being cited in their reply as justification for them not honouring immediate refund claims and, therefore, they were still adhering to the NRCoC. They also stated that their passenger charter was merely "aspirational".
I have since been forced to claim a refund back from East Coast, which takes up to a month to process.
Looking again at NRCoC it makes no sense whatsoever to have both sections 26(a) and 26(b) included if 26(a) cannot be relied upon as an option when a train is delayed or cancelled. You may as well just have 26(b).
This was the first time I had tried to obtain an immediate full refund in such circumstances, however I am left somewhat purplexed by Northern's responses.
So what are the rules surrounding 26(a)? Can TOCs just get out of giving immediate refunds due to the "wherever possible" wording? Do any TOCs actually give them? What does The Manual say in respect of immediate refunds? Has anyone else experienced similar problems to me?
An immediate refund was refused solely because my ticket was purchased from the East Coast website and, apparently, that ticket office never gives immediate refunds for internet tickets even if bought through the Northern website and any refund has to be claimed back from the original purchase point even during delay/cancellation.
Northern's own passenger charter however states that immediate refunds due to delay or cancellation can be claimed "regardless of the ticket type or where it was bought".
A complaint to Northern rail resulted in "wherever possible" in 26(a) being cited in their reply as justification for them not honouring immediate refund claims and, therefore, they were still adhering to the NRCoC. They also stated that their passenger charter was merely "aspirational".
I have since been forced to claim a refund back from East Coast, which takes up to a month to process.
Looking again at NRCoC it makes no sense whatsoever to have both sections 26(a) and 26(b) included if 26(a) cannot be relied upon as an option when a train is delayed or cancelled. You may as well just have 26(b).
This was the first time I had tried to obtain an immediate full refund in such circumstances, however I am left somewhat purplexed by Northern's responses.
So what are the rules surrounding 26(a)? Can TOCs just get out of giving immediate refunds due to the "wherever possible" wording? Do any TOCs actually give them? What does The Manual say in respect of immediate refunds? Has anyone else experienced similar problems to me?