• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

South Wales 'Metro' updates

Brissle Girl

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2018
Messages
2,673
They undertook to retain heavy rail principals on the heavy rail aspects of CVL aka Rhymney and Coryton. TAM falls outside this commitment expect to see DOO on the TAM in time.
Surely if the intention is to move to DOO you do it before you double the headcount to cover the doubling of frequency, and before you set the precedent of the guards being involved in the doors process.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
3,675
Mostly because the alternatives aren't much better. Most local news sites across the UK are so riddled with ads that they're almost unreadable. Reach is the worst offender.

I don't think there is much alternative if you actually want to read about Welsh issues, at least in traditional (in some sense) media.

Getting back to this thread, realtimetrains is showing a 231 running between Cardiff Central and Treherbert today (though I don't think one of the driving cars is really on the train back-to-front as shown...)
 

Signal_Box

Member
Joined
25 Dec 2021
Messages
655
Location
UK
Surely if the intention is to move to DOO you do it before you double the headcount to cover the doubling of frequency, and before you set the precedent of the guards being involved in the doors process.
Have they doubled the head count ? The commitment was “mainline” not heavy rail my mistake. I really hope I’m wrong as I’ve a number or friends who work on the TAM CVL lines but I’m sure the guard commitment was mainline and didn’t mention CVL, why make a distinction between the two if there wasn’t a plan to remove on one?

You remove the guard competency from CVL based crew reduce them to onboard supervisors until natural wastage allows a forced move aka southern. It’s the only way you’ll get the increased frequency and reduced dwell times CVL require.

On another note, on street running as been delayed again so the kill stone of tram trains won’t show any benefit over conventional trains for a few more years.

Also, on another note….the resignalling from Network Rail to CVL/Amey of the Rhymney / City and Queen Street area has also been delayed which in turn reduces the capacity improvements through Queen Street. Whispers are that this section may well stay with Network Rail under contract as it is kiwi just to push through the improvements sooner than later.
 

Brissle Girl

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2018
Messages
2,673
Have they doubled the head count ? The commitment was “mainline” not heavy rail my mistake. I really hope I’m wrong as I’ve a number or friends who work on the TAM CVL lines but I’m sure the guard commitment was mainline and didn’t mention CVL, why make a distinction between the two if there wasn’t a plan to remove on one?
In respect of the TAM lines (the ones where the debate over DOO operation is relevant), it's hard to see how you can double the frequency of services without doubling the headcount allocated to those services.
 

MikePJ

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2015
Messages
453
Getting back to this thread, realtimetrains is showing a 231 running between Cardiff Central and Treherbert today (though I don't think one of the driving cars is really on the train back-to-front as shown...)
Yup, saw one at Central.
 
Last edited:

MikePJ

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2015
Messages
453
Cardiff Bay this morning: looks like platform construction continues. Up by Butetown station I also saw tubular pile caps, which presumably will support overhead line masts in the near future.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0961.jpeg
    IMG_0961.jpeg
    4.7 MB · Views: 117
  • IMG_0962.jpeg
    IMG_0962.jpeg
    3.6 MB · Views: 117

Signal_Box

Member
Joined
25 Dec 2021
Messages
655
Location
UK
In respect of the TAM lines (the ones where the debate over DOO operation is relevant), it's hard to see how you can double the frequency of services without doubling the headcount allocated to those services.

Drivers yes as they’ll be a required resource long term, conductor / guards on the other hand aren’t needed in their current form. The CVL is very much in line to become an oversized tram line network the all the cost savings thats brings.

Blackpool run with conductors on every tram but their sole role is ticket collection, I can see the CVL conductors going the same way unfortunately. No way you’ll have CVL conductors on £47k lob term it just doesn’t add up.

This document on the RMT website appears to confirm that safety-critical guards' duties will remain when the 398s and 756s are introduced on the CVL.


This document must not be shared without the permission of tfw….rmt share document for everyone to read.

They certainly want their monies worth for the 47k pa! The method of working looks very much like the Greater Anglia method, not surprising considering the traction is a sister of train.

Like I say I really hope I’m wrong when it comes to the long term future of rhe guard on CVL, but being a 25 year veteran of underhand dealings I won’t hold my breath on this one.
 
Last edited:

positron

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2023
Messages
129
Location
Cardiff
I'm currently sat on what I assume is one (the newer trains that have been running on the rhymney line for a bit) at Cardiff central to Treherbert.

Have had to treble check 3 times to make sure I'm on the correct train!
They're going to be running them in the TAM lines every so often in the runup to the Eisteddfod where they're being deployed.
 

Bob Price

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2019
Messages
1,036
231010 passing Radyr Weir on Sunday. I guess this is offering the drivers the opportunity to drive a FLIRT to gain experience ahead of the 756's actually entering service.
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20240421_140350236~2.jpg
    PXL_20240421_140350236~2.jpg
    3.3 MB · Views: 147

positron

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2023
Messages
129
Location
Cardiff
If anyone gets a chance I'd love to know how big the gap at Radyr is with the flirts. It's appalling with the 150s so I can't see it being level boarding but might be closer to acceptable at least. Seems a bit odd they've not touched the track/platforms there yet
 

bradleyd

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2011
Messages
119
Location
South Wales, but from the flat Southlands of lincs
If anyone gets a chance I'd love to know how big the gap at Radyr is with the flirts. It's appalling with the 150s so I can't see it being level boarding but might be closer to acceptable at least. Seems a bit odd they've not touched the track/platforms there yet
If I happen to be on another at any point, I will try and see if I can get a photo of the gap for you
 
Joined
22 Jun 2013
Messages
393
Cardiff Bay this morning: looks like platform construction continues. Up by Butetown station I also saw tubular pile caps, which presumably will support overhead line masts in the near future.
How much work has been done in the last few months? I can see very little progress this year from those photos. It's frustrating that it seems that most TfW projects are being dragged out, is this a cash shortage issue? Similarly the bus station and Crwys Rd station.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,502
Location
Farnham
How much work has been done in the last few months? I can see very little progress this year from those photos. It's frustrating that it seems that most TfW projects are being dragged out, is this a cash shortage issue? Similarly the bus station and Crwys Rd station.
Yes, it looks exactly the same mess as it did when I used to commute to the bay up until late November.
 

bradleyd

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2011
Messages
119
Location
South Wales, but from the flat Southlands of lincs
If anyone gets a chance I'd love to know how big the gap at Radyr is with the flirts. It's appalling with the 150s so I can't see it being level boarding but might be closer to acceptable at least. Seems a bit odd they've not touched the track/platforms there yet
Here's a shot of the gap.
 

Attachments

  • 1000045285_50.jpg
    1000045285_50.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 134

Phil from Mon

Member
Joined
28 Nov 2014
Messages
379
Location
Beaumaris, Ynys Môn
How much work has been done in the last few months? I can see very little progress this year from those photos. It's frustrating that it seems that most TfW projects are being dragged out, is this a cash shortage issue? Similarly the bus station and Crwys Rd station.
Just take a look at Pontypool and New Inn. The new car park (and I think bus interchange) look to have been ready for weeks, properly surfaced and bays all marked out etc, but the whole area is still coned off.
 

5021

Member
Joined
21 Apr 2023
Messages
32
Location
Oswestry
Just take a look at Pontypool and New Inn. The new car park (and I think bus interchange) look to have been ready for weeks, properly surfaced and bays all marked out etc, but the whole area is still coned off.
Yes it's to be a Park & Ride bus interchange. It's looked finished since late last year but back in January it was reported in the Branch Line Society's newsletter that Monmouthshire County Council passenger transport planning manager believed that safety checks, which could take up to six months, were required as there were some late changes made that now need effectively signing off and the place can't open until that has been done. In 2021 the cost of the scheme had already risen to £7.2M from the £3.5M estimate so think of a number as to how much it is now.

Meanwhile, from a recent Weekly Operating notice, attached is a "go live" date for the Treherbert line's overhead wires...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-04-19 121126.png
    Screenshot 2024-04-19 121126.png
    34.1 KB · Views: 74
Last edited:

positron

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2023
Messages
129
Location
Cardiff
Here's a shot of the gap.
Ah nice thanks! Good to see that it's much more reasonable.

Yes, it looks exactly the same mess as it did when I used to commute to the bay up until late November.
A lot of stuff has changed since November but admittedly at first glance not much of it is visible. Unfortunately it's probably the sort of project where much or the work is preparation and underground where there's no visible result.
 

Envoy

Established Member
Joined
29 Aug 2014
Messages
2,480
Just take a look at Pontypool and New Inn. The new car park (and I think bus interchange) look to have been ready for weeks, properly surfaced and bays all marked out etc, but the whole area is still coned off.
Yes, it is within the Metro area and hopefully, one day, they will have a station at Caerleon and a stopping service to Abergavenny which would allow the long distance trains to run non stop from Newport to Abergavenny.

I really do wonder whether the fact that Marches services have often been 2 car trains - sometimes even 150’s - has led them to hold off opening this new car park? Why would you promote the new car park in places like Usk when you know that the trains are already often full? The present long distance customers must take priority before you go enticing on board new customers. Hopefully, it won't be too long until all Marches line trains are 5 car - but I will believe it when I see it.
 

MikePJ

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2015
Messages
453
How much work has been done in the last few months? I can see very little progress this year from those photos. It's frustrating that it seems that most TfW projects are being dragged out, is this a cash shortage issue? Similarly the bus station and Crwys Rd station.
In general, public works projects that are in progress are not delayed due to cash shortages - government rarely has an issue with cashflow the way that a business would. Slowing projects down generally increases costs, because you end up employing the core project team and prime contractors for longer.

Coming back to Cardiff Bay's progress: the contractors are there every day - I cycle along Lloyd George Avenue on my way to work and have to dodge their parked vehicles in the bus lane. The most concentrated activity seems to be around the "cart road" bridge (near the Salvation Army building), which has been closed to pedestrians and cyclists for months whilst the bridge is refurbished and strengthened. There are contractors on site every morning there at the moment.

Work on Butetown station seems to have paused for the moment.

Down at Cardiff Bay itself there's definitely continuing civils work on the new platform but it's hard to determine exactly what's going on on a daily basis. One small thing though: the Academy coffee bar, which stands more or less in the way of the future tramway extension, has now closed. This building is made of shipping containers, so it will be very easily removed when the time comes!
 

Bob Price

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2019
Messages
1,036
Down at Cardiff Bay itself there's definitely continuing civils work on the new platform but it's hard to determine exactly what's going on on a daily basis. One small thing though: the Academy coffee bar, which stands more or less in the way of the future tramway extension, has now closed. This building is made of shipping containers, so it will be very easily removed when the time comes!
Shame that was a great little coffee place. I wonder if they will re open elsewhere? Thanks for the update.
 
Joined
22 Jun 2013
Messages
393
In general, public works projects that are in progress are not delayed due to cash shortages - government rarely has an issue with cashflow the way that a business would. Slowing projects down generally increases costs, because you end up employing the core project team and prime contractors for longer.

Coming back to Cardiff Bay's progress: the contractors are there every day - I cycle along Lloyd George Avenue on my way to work and have to dodge their parked vehicles in the bus lane. The most concentrated activity seems to be around the "cart road" bridge (near the Salvation Army building), which has been closed to pedestrians and cyclists for months whilst the bridge is refurbished and strengthened. There are contractors on site every morning there at the moment.

Work on Butetown station seems to have paused for the moment.

Down at Cardiff Bay itself there's definitely continuing civils work on the new platform but it's hard to determine exactly what's going on on a daily basis. One small thing though: the Academy coffee bar, which stands more or less in the way of the future tramway extension, has now closed. This building is made of shipping containers, so it will be very easily removed when the time comes!
Thanks for the update, very helpful.

There seems to be have been very slow progress considering it started 15 months ago. Whilst there are contractors there daily, it's feels like a small number. This could surely have been all done already had there been a larger workforce. As the end date has now slipped to 2025 I assume that something has gone down since plans were first made.
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,034
In general, public works projects that are in progress are not delayed due to cash shortages - government rarely has an issue with cashflow the way that a business would. Slowing projects down generally increases costs, because you end up employing the core project team and prime contractors for longer.
Whilst it is true that there are rarely proper 'cashflow' issues within government / local government / the public sector* (as they can always borrow from somewhere), they do have a desire to balance expenditure against budgets (not necessarily income) on an annual or rolling 3-year basis. Slowing down work (as per the HS2 'pause' at Euston) makes it look like budgets are being met, even though the long term cost turns out to be higher and everyone knows it - tomorrow's and possibly someone else's problem!

Councils often freeze expenditure across the board if it looks like they are going to overspend towards the year end, pushing work, or at least the invoice, into the next financial year. In the opposite situation work is brought forward to ensure a budget is fully spent in the year. From (say) January to March highways crews will be doing road repairs like crazy to get the money spent before 31 March and screaming at contractors to get invoices in! It all comes down to: 'if the money isn't spent this year, it can only be because you asked for more than you really needed, so next year's budget will be set at that lower level'.

*recent Section 114 notices 'council bankruptcies' excluded.
 

MikePJ

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2015
Messages
453
Whilst it is true that there are rarely proper 'cashflow' issues within government / local government / the public sector* (as they can always borrow from somewhere), they do have a desire to balance expenditure against budgets (not necessarily income) on an annual or rolling 3-year basis. Slowing down work (as per the HS2 'pause' at Euston) makes it look like budgets are being met, even though the long term cost turns out to be higher and everyone knows it - tomorrow's and possibly someone else's problem!

Councils often freeze expenditure across the board if it looks like they are going to overspend towards the year end, pushing work, or at least the invoice, into the next financial year. In the opposite situation work is brought forward to ensure a budget is fully spent in the year. From (say) January to March highways crews will be doing road repairs like crazy to get the money spent before 31 March and screaming at contractors to get invoices in! It all comes down to: 'if the money isn't spent this year, it can only be because you asked for more than you really needed, so next year's budget will be set at that lower level'.

*recent Section 114 notices 'council bankruptcies' excluded.

Local government (councils) have a duty to balance budgets every year, so for maintenance and minor projects they can often defer work to next year, that’s true. At the other end of the scale, HS2 is so large that the Treasury worries about borrowing too much money in any given year (and there are politics around debt-to-gdp ratio). But I’d be very surprised if the apparent lack of progress at Cardiff Bay is cash-related - contractors are there daily, it’s just that without a drone to see what’s going on behind the hoardings, it’s very difficult for the casual observer to see obvious progress!

Shame that was a great little coffee place. I wonder if they will re open elsewhere? Thanks for the update.
If you miss it, they have another branch in Penarth, in a tiny booth next to the station.

Thanks for the update, very helpful.

There seems to be have been very slow progress considering it started 15 months ago. Whilst there are contractors there daily, it's feels like a small number. This could surely have been all done already had there been a larger workforce. As the end date has now slipped to 2025 I assume that something has gone down since plans were first made.

Just quoting the last project timeline update - Cardiff Bay branch is supposed to have wires live on one track by November this year, with the second track complete by May next year. Worth noting that the branch is currently signalled just for one train at a time, and the opening of the second track will mark the transition to tramway-style line-of-sight operations and tramway signals. So it can’t be used until a) the 398s are in service b) the Queen St resignalling, which also completes in May ‘25.

If I were to guess at a problem that’s taking longer to solve than expected, it’d be the cart road bridge: it’s been closed for a very long time, and it’s not uncommon for bridge refurbishments to uncover a variety of surprises (most notably in Oxford at the moment)
 
Last edited:

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,583
In general, public works projects that are in progress are not delayed due to cash shortages - government rarely has an issue with cashflow the way that a business would
You sure? They still have budgets and cashflow, which is then split down into lower levels. You probably have to go all the way to the Treasury if you need more cash flow, and they aren’t famous for their generosity.
Military procurement projects are frequently delayed to keep a particular year within annual spending limits.
 

MikePJ

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2015
Messages
453
You sure? They still have budgets and cashflow, which is then split down into lower levels. You probably have to go all the way to the Treasury if you need more cash flow, and they aren’t famous for their generosity.
Military procurement projects are frequently delayed to keep a particular year within annual spending limits.
True - but for a large capital project like the Metro, it's the total budget that the Treasury will be watching more than the year-to-year spend profile. My point was that you're unlikely to deliberately choose to do a go-slow on a live project with contractors on site because of cashflow.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,583
True - but for a large capital project like the Metro, it's the total budget that the Treasury will be watching more than the year-to-year spend profile. My point was that you're unlikely to deliberately choose to do a go-slow on a live project with contractors on site because of cashflow.
If you don’t have the cash flow you don’t have any option unless the contractors take IOUs.
large capital projects don’t get much larger than aircraft carriers and submarines.
 

positron

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2023
Messages
129
Location
Cardiff
One small thing though: the Academy coffee bar, which stands more or less in the way of the future tramway extension, has now closed. This building is made of shipping containers, so it will be very easily removed when the time comes!
Fwiw there's existing planning permission for a multi storey building in the location where that coffee place was and the future extension accounted for that so it doesn't need to be removed, I wonder what the plans for that land are now though.
 

Top