There have still been recent openings of new platforms where the usual concrete slabs have been used, eg Brent Cross West, I don’t think adhesive tiles are suddenly a ”one size fits all“ change.
There have also been sites where metal studs have been fitted into drilled holes. I think they’re still fairly unusual.
The stick-on plastic ones don't last well. They were added to my local station four or five years ago, and quite a few are already breaking up and/or coming loose.
The current ones being installed round here are stick-on but have a 10 year warranty for both adhesion and wear.The stick-on plastic ones don't last well. They were added to my local station four or five years ago, and quite a few are already breaking up and/or coming loose.
Probably easier in terms of repair; if one gets worn down it can be replaced more quickly than a worn-down slab.Yes, I've seen these at York. I wonder what the advantage as it seems more work
Yes they could. W made from thermoplastic( which is what the rumble strips are made of and could be applied by a hot mastic type application. As could the yellow lines and white platform edging pre-made in strip form for hot application by heat gun on-siteI wondered if tactile strip could be made of the same stuff they make road markings with in the UK. They seem to be able to cast rumble strips in that - not much different to the stuff they have on stations on platform edges.
Probably easier in terms of repair; if one gets worn down it can be replaced more quickly than a worn-down slab.
Is this not in itself a trip safety hazard? So that something designed to improve the safety for the visually impaired actually risks everyone (including the visually impaired). Plus the cost of its installation might have been more usefully spent on something better.The stick-on plastic ones don't last well. They were added to my local station four or five years ago, and quite a few are already breaking up and/or coming loose.
They're quite thin, so the edge that's left is probably only 5mm high or so. Any loose bits do seem to get removed by platform staff.Is this not in itself a trip safety hazard? So that something designed to improve the safety for the visually impaired actually risks everyone (including the visually impaired). Plus the cost of its installation might have been more usefully spent on something better.
The report makes six recommendations. The first and second are addressed to DfT and Network Rail, firstly to seek improvements in the processes that govern when tactile surfaces at the edge of station platforms should be installed, and secondly to develop a plan for installing tactile surfaces at higher priority locations in a timely manner across the railway network.
There was a lot of panic about the lack of tactile paving around the country - I think this was partly an outcome of an RAIB investigation into a death at Eden Park station of a visually impaired male.
I imagine this is a reaction to getting it installed quickly but without the same cost.
Some platform copers can be ordered which have a tactile unit bonded to them now - like yourself, I work for a principal contractor and our subbie ordered them for a new-build platform in the North East.The ORR issued an improvement notice to Network Rail over lack of tactile paving following incidents like the one at Eden Park.
Thats why there has been a fairly relentless campaign of installing tactiles across the country in the last 12 months.
As has been suggested already in this thread, typically there are three solutions:
1. Traditional concrete slab tactiles which are more permanent and robust, but not suitable to all platforms for various reasons (platform surface type, platform levels, platform widths etc).
2. Drilled stud type tactiles as has recently been installed at Piccadilly and York. These are not cheap so generally not preferred, and only applied in specific circumstances
3. Stick on tactiles. These are the cheaper and easier option, but less robust and with the shortest design life. They are stuck down with a 2 part adhesive mixed on site. Typically the adhesive will fail if the surface isn’t prepped properly, or if applied to fresh tarmac (tarmac needs to be 30 days old minimum for the adhesive to work, otherwise the oils in the tar react with the adhesive and it fails)
Don’t forget, tactiles can only be installed under possession of the line so time is often a factor too especially in the major stations where possessions times are short.
(I work for a principle contractor who are installing tactiles for Network Rail across NW&C so am fairly up to speed on this particular subject)
We've got them in many stations now, often are a trip hazard in themselves given they are not recessed. I don't expect they will last very long, and they certainly look shoddyThe stick-on plastic ones don't last well. They were added to my local station four or five years ago, and quite a few are already breaking up and/or coming loose.
There are various types of tactile to indicate different situations - platform edges (different for trams), wayfinding, steps, road crossings. The latest seems to be to fit wayfinding tactiles along a new or re-built platform. These are the ones with corduroy strips indicating the direction to go, but I was in a presentation from Network Rail showing how these can really mess up the platform layout if done wrong.At the new entrance at University station, there are two different types of tactile paving.
The ORR issued an improvement notice to Network Rail over lack of tactile paving following incidents like the one at Eden Park.
Thats why there has been a fairly relentless campaign of installing tactiles across the country in the last 12 months.
As has been suggested already in this thread, typically there are three solutions:
1. Traditional concrete slab tactiles which are more permanent and robust, but not suitable to all platforms for various reasons (platform surface type, platform levels, platform widths etc).
2. Drilled stud type tactiles as has recently been installed at Piccadilly and York. These are not cheap so generally not preferred, and only applied in specific circumstances
3. Stick on tactiles. These are the cheaper and easier option, but less robust and with the shortest design life. They are stuck down with a 2 part adhesive mixed on site. Typically the adhesive will fail if the surface isn’t prepped properly, or if applied to fresh tarmac (tarmac needs to be 30 days old minimum for the adhesive to work, otherwise the oils in the tar react with the adhesive and it fails)
Don’t forget, tactiles can only be installed under possession of the line so time is often a factor too especially in the major stations where possessions times are short.
(I work for a principle contractor who are installing tactiles for Network Rail across NW&C so am fairly up to speed on this particular subject)
Marsh Barton and Reading Green Park are examples of the latest thinking on separate tactiles for wayfinding, there are mentions/photos in the two threads.There are various types of tactile to indicate different situations - platform edges (different for trams), wayfinding, steps, road crossings. The latest seems to be to fit wayfinding tactiles along a new or re-built platform. These are the ones with corduroy strips indicating the direction to go, but I was in a presentation from Network Rail showing how these can really mess up the platform layout if done wrong.
Waiting for a train today, I noticed an example of the kind of problem that has occurred with the plastic variety (1st photo). There does seem to have been a recent replacement effort though, judging from the number of evidently newer panels along the platform (2nd photo). So at least some attention is being paid to them, though not to the extent of putting in proper concrete ones instead.The stick-on plastic ones don't last well. They were added to my local station four or five years ago, and quite a few are already breaking up and/or coming loose.