It takes the spotlight off the individual disputes, but also feeds into a wider impression that the UK isn’t functioning properly at the moment, which ultimately reflects badly on the government.
Yes, as political campaigns go it is proving very expensive for the union members.
It isn't like the Conservatives were already 25% behind anyway. Anyone expecting Labour to be elected promising to spend money reopening ticket offices and bringing back Guards between St Pancras and Bedford (removed 1982) is likely to be disappointed. The nurses, care sector and the NHS are first, second and third for cash.
Days of plenty on the railway are over thanks to nationalisation, the unions are struggling to adjust for the reality of what they campaigned so hard for.
It wasn't even mentioned as a 'string' to the deal previously and the Government knew full well that guards were never going to vote for a consultation that might see an end to their jobs. Sticking the DOO clause in effectively guaranteed that the current month-long period of industrial action would go ahead.
Absolutely right.
Bedford went DOO in 1982. The government should have done the union members and the rest of the economy a favour and just got on with it. When a role is redundant, it is redundant.
No compulsory redundancies is an absurd proposition that cannot exist in the private sector (as they can go bust) and it never existed in BR either. It is a barrier to technology, efficiency and progress and traps employees in low productivity jobs that should have been replaced and automated.