Regarding 155s it's worth noting they have a very high seating density considering they have 2+2 seating. I think it's around 8 more seats per carriage than a 156 or around 12 more seats per carriage than a standard class only 158.
When the ValleyLines electrification was given the go-ahead, Maesteg, Ebbw Vale and the Vale Of Glamorgan were all very much part of the plan
The electrification was not given the go-ahead.
There was a funding deal between UK/WG against the cost of a notional combined electrification/metro project still in development.
That project has got nowhere in the interim, in fact it has gone backwards from an electrification point of view (routes, cost, timescale, ownership).
There is no start date.
Prospects for Cardiff-Swansea are possibly a bit better, as NR will have a design (but no money).
Currently on the 11:52 Chester-Manchester which is a 3-coach 175...and very full. Up until Warrington it was near enough packed out. Is this normal for this train on a Friday?
Could a UK railway gauge version of the Hyundai Rotum 22000 class be an option for this franchise? Having travelled long distances on both this and the 175 in consecutive days, I would say the 22000 is a better quality DMU. They would suit the long distance South Wales services down to the ground, if ordered in 4-car formation.
I see the Marches line as the benchmark for the rest of the franchise (outside of Cardiff Metro area) if we get new longer length stock to run an hourly IC/ Regional Express type Manchester to Swansea service then it bodes well for cascades/ elsewhere.
I see the Marches line as the benchmark for the rest of the franchise (outside of Cardiff Metro area) if we get new longer length stock to run an hourly IC/ Regional Express type Manchester to Swansea service then it bodes well for cascades/ elsewhere.
Which I believe is one of the more commercial routes - though Cambrian - Salop - Brum must be well up there.
And not Cardiff through to Holyhead which the Welsh Government seem to be obsessed with
Interestingly, I was on a 143 that had been refreshed internally today (don't ask me which) - It had new seat covers and the tops of the seats had been painted with a greeny-blue. It's the first 143 I've seen refreshed, the rest being 142s.
Currently on the 11:52 Chester-Manchester which is a 3-coach 175...and very full. Up until Warrington it was near enough packed out. Is this normal for this train on a Friday?
What do you mean by "packed out"?
The other option is cascading Northern and GWR Pacers to Wales as they're released end of 2018/early 2019 to allow 150/2s to go away for work in bulk throughout 2019, but that option is not very appealing.
Is the image above an old photo? I thought Northern had refreshed all the ex-Merseytravel 142s.
I can categorically disagree with these comments. I'm in Northern land this week, and was subjected to the full horrors of two Northern 142 journeys today, with one journey being full and standing at peak time.
These 142s seemed unchanged from the 1980s, complete with 3+2 bus seats. I haven't been on a bus seated Pacer for over 15 years.
It is an old photo, but the 142s I endured yesterday on the Man Picc - Knutsford journeys I made were exactly the same as in that photo, apart from the seat coverings being Northern navy rather than the colour in that picture.
Effective monitoring of performance
Greener, cleaner service
Integrated network with buses and other train operators
New routes and service frequencies responding to passenger needs
Affordable fares with clear, simple ticketing options
New trains with adequate space and on-board services
Better information and communication on connections and delays
Modern stations
Ensure all passengers pay their fares
Reduced disruption
Overview
Passengers would like to see the operator of the new franchise
to have a very local focus and non-corporate feel. Current
passengers often speak highly of local staff members. They
recognise the big gaps in the network between North, Mid
and South Wales, and would like to see more of a coherent
organisation behind the provision of transport services in Wales.
Overall, passengers want the basics fixed before focusing on
advanced improvements and a significantly enhanced service.
Passengers see these as the overarching themes, which are
manifested in a number of day-to-day concerns.
The reasons passengers choose to use Arriva Trains Wales
services are similar to those for other operators. Driving (and
parking) is seen as expensive, time consuming and more
stressful than taking the train, although for group travel it can be
cheaper. Buses are useful for short journeys, but where the train
is an option it is seen as preferable due to speed, predictability
and comfort. Coaches for longer journeys are perceived to be
cheaper, but also slower, more unpredictable and seldom an
Better quality carriages must be a "priority" for the next Wales and Border rail franchise, the economy secretary has said. Ken Skates said bidders for the franchise had been told improvements would need to be seen quickly.
from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-wal...ages-a-priority-for-next-wales-rail-franchise
The competitive tender spiel were not specifying anything seems to have been ditched.....
Should I understand that (belatedly) an assembly economic committee has spent money doing a survey that presumably TfW has already done? Also, whilst it is true that this is the first franchise that TfW will let, I cannot believe that they are really starting from square one; if they are, then there is reason to expect a delay and/or a mess.
Sounds like their setting the scene to deflect future criticism. Sorry we forgot to specify trains to Treherbert but it is out first time and it was jolly hard you know"
There will of course be many other "priorities".
Nothing will happen until a franchise contract is signed, unless WG opens its wallet earlier, so at least 6 months away.