Shunter_69
Member
- Joined
- 10 Dec 2014
- Messages
- 478
There is a 317 with light blue rather than red doors at Ilford. Assume this is the new LO WA inners livery.
Will all Crossrail 315s have a blue stripe applied and perhaps Overground examples having an opposing stripe? Be quite effective as long as the doors don't clash too much
Leaving them too plain could make them no different in appearence to the greater anglia fleet
There is a 317 with light blue rather than red doors at Ilford. Assume this is the new LO WA inners livery.
Article in today's edp about a revamp at Norwich station
http://www.edp24.co.uk/home/motoring/revamp_revealed_for_norwich_railway_station_1_4073427
Eastern Daily Press said:Abellio Greater Anglia has started the first phase of the work on the concourse at the station, which dates back to the 1840s.
The work, which rail bosses said was a “six-figure” investment, will see the relocation of the automatic ticket gates to create easier access to the toilets. People currently need a ticket to get to them.
It will also see the installation of a new First Class lounge, a refurbished waiting room on platform six, improved cycle parking and the introduction of Abellio Greater Anglia’s cycle hire scheme.
The first phase, now underway, will see the ticket barriers moved and the central cash points taken away. That work is expected to take four weeks to complete.
Work is also due to start to extend the existing cycle area to provide a further 242 covered, free cycle parking spaces and the company’s Bike and Go cycle hire scheme will be installed.
That scheme will mean 10 bicycles are available for hire.
In the summer, Abellio Greater Anglia’s customer services team will be moved to a new office on the station’s concourse. which will also feature new retail units and cash machines, if it gets planning permission.
And, towards the end of the year, the existing waiting room on platform six will be refurbished and a new first class lounge created alongside platform one in the old customer service office.
James Reeve, Abellio Greater Anglia’s area customer service manager, said: “This is an exciting project for the station which will deliver a much-improved layout of the station concourse, refurbished waiting rooms and toilet facilities and improved cycle storage.
“Investing in upgrades to stations across the network is extremely important to Abellio Greater Anglia, demonstrating our commitment to providing excellent facilities and service to our customers.
“We will be doing all we can to progress the works as quickly as possible and to minimise any inconvenience to our customers while these improvements are carried out.
“We are grateful to our customers for their co-operation and patience in the meantime.”
Expect the toilets at Norwich to probably become pay to use once the revamp is finished and they are open to be used by all.
Expect the toilets at Norwich to probably become pay to use once the revamp is finished and they are open to be used by all.
rant said:With the fragmenting of the railways into Train Operating Companies the concept of standard coaching stock and multiple units has gone. Whilst it means there should be constant innovation in provision of stock it also means most build runs are much smaller than in BR days meaning unit costs are getting progressively higher. If the winning bidder of a new franchise wants to replace their train fleet there are lots of hurdles they have to pass, the main one still being is he government still willing to underwrite the order costs to recovered during the life of the new rolling stock. Sadly this means that the TOC with the oldest train fleet in England is Abellio Greater Anglia which as a result is plagued with defects on a daily basis. Constant short formed services, defects not repaired for months whilst units are still running in revenue service. Internal features that have not been updated for over 20 years or more and seat fabrics that should have been replaced at least twice over but left in place presenting a filthy image to the long suffering captive commuters. Compare this to the next door company C2C with immaculate trains kept clean and running an efficient service. In 16 days TfL takes over AGA's Metro services, some going to LOROL and the Shenfield service becoming TfLRail until delivery of the Crossrail units arrives and they line becomes CrossRail! They have promised that by 30th November 2015 every train will be deep cleaned, repainted and refreshed inside and out, something that AGA should have done but didnt. They have already started despite not officially being the owner of the service and at least three units have been refreshed, apart from seat covers, which rather ruins the effect.
rant said:Abellio took over from National Express and sent back a load of trains to reduce their lease costs. As a result of this they cannot actually maintain their train fleet in sufficient time to meet their published timetabled services. For example they have run on average over 20 short formed services every day this week. Their trains are not cleaned properly and are filthy with seat covers that were on the trains when the first franchise was awarded back in 1997 so you can see thats been over 17 years so far when under BR seats were recovered every 7 years tops! have a look at the Twitter feed for @delayed_again and check out their pictures of the condition that passengers have to put up with!
my reply said:Yes, Abellio haven't refreshed the interiors... Oh wait, that is exactly what is currently being done on the Mark 3 hauled stock
I believe it was specified as compulsory in the current 2 year franchise contract, but still. The previous 2012 to 2014 one was just one to keep things ticking over, they really weren't going to spend a lot of money on interior work that isn't compulsory, when in less than two years they may not have even been operating it, therefore would have been money down the drain for them.
LOROL and TfL on the other hand have specified that work is to be done on the interiors, which is why they'll be doing it.
Their stock isn't even that old compared to some of the stuff LUL are running. The 317s are 28-33 years old and 315s are 34-35 years old. Given that replacement is scheduled for 2017-2019, none of them will reach 40 years in service. LUL's 72ts and 73ts are already 38-43 years old, and it is still at least 7 years until they start being replaced.
Those "20 short formed services" will be only about 3-4 unit diagrams. Something that other operators encounter a lot too. South West Trains that I use very often also get that. Abellio's communication through the Twitter feed is excellent, certainly better than certain other operators in London. Ok it could be manned for longer, but even within the hours it is manned it is far more useful than Southern's, who have stopped posting almost all updates about services, and not giving information about short forms.
None of Abellio's 315/317/321 stock has original flooring from when the trains entered service, but most Southeastern 465/466 and about 20 of Thameslink's 319s have trains where only the seating moquette has been changed in the 25 years those trains have been running, and the original flooring remains. London Midland's 7 remaining 321s still have the original NSE covers from when they entered service in 1989-1990, although carpet was fitted a few years ago. LUL 72ts have 15+ year old seat coverings, something that the now-withdrawn C69/77 and A60/62 almost reached by the time they were withdrawn.
I was referring to the AGA seating on stations. Yes, all 44 315s transferring to CrossRail will have blue stripe but no mention of CrossRail.
If I was entering dialogue with AGA about anything, the last person I'd want butting in is delayed_again, with the usual 'What do you expect', 'they're always this bad', 'Kick Abellio out' and so on.
The photos he Tweets (or re-tweets) are usually so trivial it's quite embarrassing, and obviously he misses out on the genuine issues that get discussed here.
Abellio is far from perfect, just like any TOC pretty much, but you can't get bogged down moaning about non-events.
I've ranted plenty about Wagn and FCC over the years, but like to think I've always been fair. Indeed, I think I've made a strong effort to highlight the many, many good things that have happened by these TOCs and others. That doesn't make me an apologist (or staff, as I'm now accused of!) but someone who believes in being fair.
That's the main problem with the AGA-haters. They're so blinkered, they can't see anything good. As such they're ignored, and justifiably so IMHO.
AGA is already made to look bad if you believe Twitter. Now Twitter is full of people laughing that AGA has been FORCED to cut its fares because TfL has come in, and it's a victory for the passenger and shows how evil AGA is.
It's believed that the stock LOROL gets will now be magically transformed and be totally spotless, and maintained to a higher standard (yes, I do believe they think TfL has its own maintenance facilities and staff to do it, presumably with better skills and equipment).
When you've got people thinking like that, there's nothing AGA can (or perhaps should) do.
I'd guess many of these people were the same ones laughing at National Express when Abellio got the route, expecting all the trains to become spotless overnight, never suffer any maintenance issues, have cheaper fares and make every train on time, even though it was clearly a caretaker award.
I'm sure I remember one of them posting that Abellio *obviously* has better maintenance teams, as they don't need as many trains to run the same number of services.