mushroomchow
Member
I still stand by that it is not the GWML where the diesel engines will be "found out" on the IETs, but on the MML and, more pressingly, on the TPE franchise's northern routes, both of which have had their electrification shelved for CP6 at the very least and probably for the foreseeable, ironically thanks to the scandalous overspends on the GW project.
One year of potentially struggling to keep to a timetable in GWR's case is nothing compared to potentially relying primarily on the diesel engines for the unit's entire life cycle, and in the case of the EM franchise having to compete with existing stock in the 222s which boast superior acceleration to the HSTs they are currently being compared to.
There's a possibility that new and more powerful models may become available before the incoming EM franchisee places their bi-mode order, but I can't see the development being good enough for what is required for that route, not least with train frequency and linespeeds in many non-electrified locations increasing from 2019 and the risks associated with any timetable slippage becoming greater as a result.
One year of potentially struggling to keep to a timetable in GWR's case is nothing compared to potentially relying primarily on the diesel engines for the unit's entire life cycle, and in the case of the EM franchise having to compete with existing stock in the 222s which boast superior acceleration to the HSTs they are currently being compared to.
There's a possibility that new and more powerful models may become available before the incoming EM franchisee places their bi-mode order, but I can't see the development being good enough for what is required for that route, not least with train frequency and linespeeds in many non-electrified locations increasing from 2019 and the risks associated with any timetable slippage becoming greater as a result.