Easy solution to that (for me) is to book a non ensuite cabin!
Never really see the point of ensuites myself. I know some people want them though.
I wouldn't normally pay the extra but that's what I was allocated with my Flexipass ticket.
Easy solution to that (for me) is to book a non ensuite cabin!
Never really see the point of ensuites myself. I know some people want them though.
They won’t be there in the morningBeen past Longsight this lunchtime, they are still there
If you're draining the grey waste onto the track though why would you be threading anything through anything other than directly down to the ground?!In a building context you normally look for a minimum of 18mm per m; a pipe running half the length of a 20m coach would need 180mm fall but then you have to add the depth of whatever tank it's being collected in, plus the vertical drop from the shower tray... pretty easy to see how quickly that could eat into whatever space you have between floor level and lowest part of undercarriage which can't be more than about 600mm. And I imagine it's no simple matter to find a continuous straight run threaded through everything else that has to fit under the floor... and presumably in a moving vehicle which can be on gradients and canted track and so on, the rate of fall that works in a static building context quickly becomes irrelevant. So I can see why it's probably inevitable there has to be some kind of pumped system.
Sure - I was thinking of the scenario where it doesn't drain onto the track.If you're draining the grey waste onto the track though why would you be threading anything through anything other than directly down to the ground?!
Sure - I was thinking of the scenario where it doesn't drain onto the track.
In that case gravity drainage would seem a bit risky because you don't want that tank backing up into the shower... I assume that a pumped system allows you to have one-way valves and so on.The showers / sinks go into the same tanks as the bogs anyway so would be no need to run pipework the length of the coach.
92043 returning the miscreant Mk5s to Polmadie tonight:
5Z92 23:15 Longsight Wheel Lathe - Polmadie
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O15439/2019/06/19/advanced
Looking like one more portion to be cancelled north-bound tomorrow night.They're needed at Wembley though, not Polmadie.
When would these be due to travel down south again? Maybe tomorrow daytime as empty stock? Or tomorrow evening in service (with the other set 'resting' in Scotland, or subject some kind of repairs)?92043 returning the miscreant Mk5s to Polmadie tonight:
5Z92 23:15 Longsight Wheel Lathe - Polmadie
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O15439/2019/06/19/advanced
Ah, OK thanks.Looking like one more portion to be cancelled north-bound tomorrow night.
I believe they’ll just be reunited with the rest of the set at Polmadie on Friday and form a full southbound Lowlander service Fri night.When would these be due to travel down south again? Maybe tomorrow daytime as empty stock? Or tomorrow evening in service (with the other set 'resting' in Scotland, or subject some kind of repairs)?
Could be either - Glasgow was cancelled Sun/Mon then Edinburgh Tue/Wed nights.Is it fair to make an assumption that it'll be the Edinburgh n/b portion to be cancelled this evening? Considering the repaired stock will be reunited in Polmadie tomorrow with the rest of the set, etc.
(asking for me.. tonight I'll either be onboard a sleeper train to Glasgow or a hotel adjacent to Gatwick airport)
Bit surprised there’s been no announcement from CS as it’s been known for a day or two now that the repaired Mk5s were going to Polmadie last night and hence at the “wrong” end for tonight.
I think it's more a case that some people need them, especially later in lifeNever really see the point of ensuites myself. I know some people want them though.
CAF have been building Viewliner II sleepers for Amtrak but a similar time (because they're late) as the Mark 5. I don't know of others they've built. Renfe's sleepers were built by Talgo.One aspect that I haven't seen mentioned anywhere, is whether CAF have built sleepers for other operators before, or whether the mk5s are a new departure for them?
Thanks, I hadn't realised that it was CAF building the latest Viewliner series. Though I imagine the internal layout might be quite different, since although Viewliners are small by US standards (vs the double deckers), I suspect they're still quite a bit bigger than the mk5s.CAF have been building Viewliner II sleepers for Amtrak but a similar time (because they're late) as the Mark 5. I don't know of others they've built. Renfe's sleepers were built by Talgo.
But isn't there a difference between full service application (which should not damage the wheels) and emergency? After all, if the train is about to hit e.g. a low-loader stranded on a level crossing (think Hixon) then a few wheel flats are a small price to pay for possibly reducing the impact (literally). Maybe the problem is how the on-board software can assess the severity of the potential emergency, and what input data it has for that purpose.Is it likely that CS will be able to claim from CAF for losses resulting from the recent incident?
Surely an automatic emergency brake application shouldn't cause severe wheel flats?
Surely an automatic emergency brake application shouldn't cause severe wheel flats?
I think it was stated upthread that the wheel slide protection didn’t activate.
The Guest Service Manager has emailed me to warn that the lounge on the (Fort William and Aberdeen portion of the?) northbound Highlander is out of action this evening.
I suspect that other passengers haven't been informed...Wow that’s surprisingly well organised. Often you don’t find out till you walk past the lounge car and find it in darkness!
Thank you for the thought, appreciated. Unfortunately it won't make any difference for me because I'm a wheelchair user. I can't get into the lounge car anyway because between London and Edinburgh the Fort William accessible sleeper cabin is not next to the lounge. As a result they offer disabled people occupying the Fort William accessible cabin, room service from the Fort William / Aberdeen lounge car. But they say they won't if the Fort William / Aberdeen lounge car is out.Last time the Fort William/Aberdeen lounge was out of action on the Highlander (when I was on, also on a busy Friday night) first class passengers from the Fort William and Aberdeen portions were allowed to use the Inverness lounge, with a takeaway service for standard class passengers. Obviously it depends on the crew but something similar should hopefully be arranged tonight.
The Guest Service Manager has emailed me to warn that the lounge on the (Fort William and Aberdeen portion of the?) northbound Highlander is out of action this evening.
One aspect that I haven't seen mentioned anywhere, is whether CAF have built sleepers for other operators before, or whether the mk5s are a new departure for them? I realise that a standard European design might have needed modification to fit UK loading gauge, but some of what appear to be oversights in the layout seem surprising if they are basically an established design. But perhaps neither CAF nor anyone else has built any sleepers for a long time.