TfL do a lot of bond financing.However the Minister can remove that constraint with a literal stroke of a pen though.
If they borrow any more they get a credit downgrade and end up paying more to borrow...
TfL do a lot of bond financing.However the Minister can remove that constraint with a literal stroke of a pen though.
Except that is not how that is going to work.TfL do a lot of bond financing.
If they borrow any more they get a credit downgrade and end up paying more to borrow...
Nope, just some 375/377s that currently berth in the sidings adjacent to the Hitachi depot will need somewhere else to berth overnight, nothing more to it than that.
Except is it lower than the UK's.Except that is not how that is going to work.
TfL's debt is de-facto backed by the full faith of the British Government.
Unless you think they would ever let TfL default?
There is essentially zero chance of TfL ever defaulting no matter how much they borrow, so their credit rating is essentially the same as the states.
Not by a substantial margin.Except is it lower than the UK's.
There will be, Thameslink is only 20 of 24tph peak currently.what i wanna know is why are Thamelink trains being stabled in Ashford now, last i checked, there is no Thameslink route to Ashford
They have already used PWLB and EIB (now closed to new UK lending) extensively too.Not by a substantial margin.
Fitch puts the UK at AA with a negative watch, and TfL at AA- with a negative watch.
And if the bond issuing becomes an issue they can always just go the PWLB or similar body that the Minister can also create with the stroke of a pen.
well ok then, didn't know Thameslink was popular enough to worrent a route expansionThere will be, Thameslink is only 20 of 24tph peak currently.
Cambridge - Maidstone with some extensions to Ashford are the services being stabled at Ashford.
Well I think that it should have been obvious since they've been trying to expand it since the 90s!well ok then, didn't know Thameslink was popular enough to worrent a route expansion
However the Minister can remove that constraint with a literal stroke of a pen though.
Can't see the current setup changing to be honest. Why would a Conservative Government help out a Labour Mayor of London? If they were both of the same political persuasion however....
Ther other thing that doesn't help the current Mayor is his fares freeze. Clearly this has reducedincome relative to costs and the Tories have had no end of fun pointing this out regardless of the merits or otherwise of the idea.
The missing question is “Why did it take you so long to realise that the new franchise was not going to deliver on passenger benefits, etc.?”Transport Minster response to select committee over why franchise cancelled
https://www.parliament.uk/documents...outh-eastern-franchise-competition-300819.pdf
So they couldn’t have applied the same to the WCP then?Transport Minster response to select committee over why franchise cancelled
https://www.parliament.uk/documents...outh-eastern-franchise-competition-300819.pdf
Will the proposed fast services between Ashford and Charing Cross via the classic route still go ahead ?
pretty sure those proposals were based on having new rolling stock and increased capacity which, well, they aren't getting now so I doubt it especially since if anything they're losing capacity.
Seeing as the DofT own the 365's now just stick the shoegear back on them and that should give enough unitsWill the proposed fast services between Ashford and Charing Cross via the classic route still go ahead ?
Only 8 of the ones not in use had 3rd rail gear, all the equipment was binned at various stages and wouldn't pass safety tests if refitted hence quite an expensive job.Seeing as the DofT own the 365's now just stick the shoegear back on them and that should give enough units
Will the proposed fast services between Ashford and Charing Cross via the classic route still go ahead ?
Seeing as the DofT own the 365's now just stick the shoegear back on them and that should give enough units
Why does it need a fast service when we have HS1?
Only 8 of the ones not in use had 3rd rail gear, all the equipment was binned at various stages and wouldn't pass safety tests if refitted hence quite an expensive job.
(see 365 thread for the detail)
They seem like decent units. I could live with that.
Because HS1 is massively overcrowded and goes to the wrong side of London.
It’s amazingly pathetic that one can travel across a large part of South London from Shortlands to Brixton for free.
My local stations at Greenwich and Blackheath are both major suburban stations, with Greenwich being an actual TfL interchange both still have no proper barriers, Greenwich is large enough to have them.
The whole Southeastern situation is a great big pathetic joke, from the franchising to the lack of rolling stock to the ridiculous 2 car networker issue and the revenue on the metro being so ineffective as to giving about three generations of chavs free travel which I end up subsidising.
It’s amazingly pathetic that one can travel across a large part of South London from Shortlands to Brixton for free.
My local stations at Greenwich and Blackheath are both major suburban stations, with Greenwich being an actual TfL interchange both still have no proper barriers, Greenwich is large enough to have them.
Shoe gear - Cheap enough to buy /make all the required bits.Could they not just nick the shoe gear off of something else heading for the scrapyard ? They're not particularly hi tec.