• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

SouthEastern franchise direct award through to 1 April 2020 (& franchise competition terminated)

Status
Not open for further replies.

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,403
However the Minister can remove that constraint with a literal stroke of a pen though.
TfL do a lot of bond financing.
If they borrow any more they get a credit downgrade and end up paying more to borrow...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,755
TfL do a lot of bond financing.
If they borrow any more they get a credit downgrade and end up paying more to borrow...
Except that is not how that is going to work.

TfL's debt is de-facto backed by the full faith of the British Government.
Unless you think they would ever let TfL default?

There is essentially zero chance of TfL ever defaulting no matter how much they borrow, so their credit rating is essentially the same as the states.
 

rdlover777

Member
Joined
4 Feb 2014
Messages
450
Location
Kent
Nope, just some 375/377s that currently berth in the sidings adjacent to the Hitachi depot will need somewhere else to berth overnight, nothing more to it than that.

what i wanna know is why are Thamelink trains being stabled in Ashford now, last i checked, there is no Thameslink route to Ashford
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,403
Except that is not how that is going to work.

TfL's debt is de-facto backed by the full faith of the British Government.
Unless you think they would ever let TfL default?

There is essentially zero chance of TfL ever defaulting no matter how much they borrow, so their credit rating is essentially the same as the states.
Except is it lower than the UK's.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,755
Except is it lower than the UK's.
Not by a substantial margin.
Fitch puts the UK at AA with a negative watch, and TfL at AA- with a negative watch.

And if the bond issuing becomes an issue they can always just go the PWLB or similar body that the Minister can also create with the stroke of a pen.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,403
what i wanna know is why are Thamelink trains being stabled in Ashford now, last i checked, there is no Thameslink route to Ashford
There will be, Thameslink is only 20 of 24tph peak currently.
Cambridge - Maidstone with some extensions to Ashford are the services being stabled at Ashford.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,403
Not by a substantial margin.
Fitch puts the UK at AA with a negative watch, and TfL at AA- with a negative watch.

And if the bond issuing becomes an issue they can always just go the PWLB or similar body that the Minister can also create with the stroke of a pen.
They have already used PWLB and EIB (now closed to new UK lending) extensively too.

Ministers will probably provide some as they have been doing e.g. DLR depot changes funding but not on the scale required. They might well say "How much!!!"
 

rdlover777

Member
Joined
4 Feb 2014
Messages
450
Location
Kent
There will be, Thameslink is only 20 of 24tph peak currently.
Cambridge - Maidstone with some extensions to Ashford are the services being stabled at Ashford.
well ok then, didn't know Thameslink was popular enough to worrent a route expansion
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,954
However the Minister can remove that constraint with a literal stroke of a pen though.

Can't see the current setup changing to be honest. Why would a Conservative Government help out a Labour Mayor of London? If they were both of the same political persuasion however....

Ther other thing that doesn't help the current Mayor is his fares freeze. Clearly this has reducedincome relative to costs and the Tories have had no end of fun pointing this out regardless of the merits or otherwise of the idea.
 

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,375
Can't see the current setup changing to be honest. Why would a Conservative Government help out a Labour Mayor of London? If they were both of the same political persuasion however....

Ther other thing that doesn't help the current Mayor is his fares freeze. Clearly this has reducedincome relative to costs and the Tories have had no end of fun pointing this out regardless of the merits or otherwise of the idea.

Because Tories can quote they've done it and get the plaudits in time for next general or Mayoral election. It wouldnt actually have changed by the time of election and living in area and knowing local media Khan wouldn't get the praise for it
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,084
Location
Yorks
Will the proposed fast services between Ashford and Charing Cross via the classic route still go ahead ?
 

IceAgeComing

Member
Joined
31 Jul 2018
Messages
74
Will the proposed fast services between Ashford and Charing Cross via the classic route still go ahead ?

pretty sure those proposals were based on having new rolling stock and increased capacity which, well, they aren't getting now so I doubt it especially since if anything they're losing capacity.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,084
Location
Yorks
pretty sure those proposals were based on having new rolling stock and increased capacity which, well, they aren't getting now so I doubt it especially since if anything they're losing capacity.

Cheers.

I feared that might be the case, but thought it worth asking.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,403
Seeing as the DofT own the 365's now just stick the shoegear back on them and that should give enough units
Only 8 of the ones not in use had 3rd rail gear, all the equipment was binned at various stages and wouldn't pass safety tests if refitted hence quite an expensive job.
(see 365 thread for the detail)
 

Terry Tait

Member
Joined
31 Jul 2019
Messages
196
The whole Southeastern situation is a great big pathetic joke, from the franchising to the lack of rolling stock to the ridiculous 2 car networker issue and the revenue on the metro being so ineffective as to giving about three generations of chavs free travel which I end up subsidising.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,084
Location
Yorks
Only 8 of the ones not in use had 3rd rail gear, all the equipment was binned at various stages and wouldn't pass safety tests if refitted hence quite an expensive job.
(see 365 thread for the detail)

Could they not just nick the shoe gear off of something else heading for the scrapyard ? They're not particularly hi tec.
 

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,375
Solutions only apply to other franchises. Amazing how often with SE things can't be done.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
They seem like decent units. I could live with that.



Because HS1 is massively overcrowded and goes to the wrong side of London.

HS1 goes to the right side of London, anyone wanting London Bridge can either use the classic routes or get a frequent TL from St Pancras to London Bridge.
 

NorthKent1989

Established Member
Joined
13 May 2017
Messages
1,910
It’s amazingly pathetic that one can travel across a large part of South London from Shortlands to Brixton for free.

My local stations at Greenwich and Blackheath are both major suburban stations, with Greenwich being an actual TfL interchange both still have no proper barriers, Greenwich is large enough to have them.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
It’s amazingly pathetic that one can travel across a large part of South London from Shortlands to Brixton for free.

My local stations at Greenwich and Blackheath are both major suburban stations, with Greenwich being an actual TfL interchange both still have no proper barriers, Greenwich is large enough to have them.

That’s something that could be rectified tomorrow in a direct award but nobody ever thinks of tackling the huge amounts of fare evasion that happens there!
 

bionic

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2013
Messages
883
The whole Southeastern situation is a great big pathetic joke, from the franchising to the lack of rolling stock to the ridiculous 2 car networker issue and the revenue on the metro being so ineffective as to giving about three generations of chavs free travel which I end up subsidising.

It’s amazingly pathetic that one can travel across a large part of South London from Shortlands to Brixton for free.

My local stations at Greenwich and Blackheath are both major suburban stations, with Greenwich being an actual TfL interchange both still have no proper barriers, Greenwich is large enough to have them.

These two posts sum SE metro operations up perfectly. Some parts of the network feel intimidating to passengers and can be downright dangerous at certain times. It's been like this since the 1990s. Whatever PR guff the company come out with they conveniently ignore this massive elephant in the room. Train travel is effectively free in southeast London.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,403
Could they not just nick the shoe gear off of something else heading for the scrapyard ? They're not particularly hi tec.
Shoe gear - Cheap enough to buy /make all the required bits.
The main problem is that the isolation wasn't adequate previously (close but not quite) and this is now on everyones radar screens after several SWT/R 455 incidents were the new traction electronics went up in smoke but couldn't be isolated from the 3rd rail. Ditto the 458 post refurb fire. It isn't just the shoe gear...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top