• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

What is Zoom?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
No worries, even as someone who works in IT I've barely used it & hadn't heard much about it before March! :D

I knew of it and had encountered it once or twice, but that's about it. I doubt if it'll last - it's rather a one-trick pony and its best features are being copied by other platforms, which do more in the way of other things already.

It's also pretty expensive for what it does - monthly subscriptions would cost us more than Office 365, which does way more and includes Teams.
 

jtuk

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2018
Messages
423
Teams is awful resource hogging software though, will leave that there so as not to divert wildly off thread
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
9,996
Location
Baildon, West Yorkshire
I knew of it and had encountered it once or twice, but that's about it. I doubt if it'll last - it's rather a one-trick pony and its best features are being copied by other platforms, which do more in the way of other things already.

It's also pretty expensive for what it does - monthly subscriptions would cost us more than Office 365, which does way more and includes Teams.

Yeah, I use 365/Teams both at work and personally (helped by my employer being part of the home user programme).
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
Teams is awful resource hogging software though, will leave that there so as not to divert wildly off thread

That's as may be (and I don't disagree) - but by being part of Office it'll still get used a lot!
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
6,879
Location
UK
Thanks. I'm a bit behind the times. Kids these days are way ahead of me. My daughter would laugh at me!
Understandable, until February I hadn't heard of it either.
 

Barn

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2008
Messages
1,473
Interesting stat at the beginning of lockdown - the company that owns Zoom apparently gained a market capitalisation higher than the world's seven largest airline groups put together.
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,694
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
Zoom is excellent (though less excellent than it was) for video calls and bridges, certainly a gazillion percent better than Webex, the sound and video quality of which continues to have an early 2000s-like vibe to it.

Teams.. now that the conferencing tech from Skype for Business is built-in, that bit works pretty well. It's a shame that the rest of the app appears to have had design input from half of Microsoft. The application tries to be all things to all people and as a result is almost impossible to intuitively navigate.
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
11,022
Understandable, until February I hadn't heard of it either.

The company my wife works for had been using it a bit prior to lockdown but even then most had quite a steep learning curve for the more advanced features.

Whilst Teams had some good features I suspect that the reason Zoom is used quite a bit is that you can have others join without needing to have an account (although this also caused problems like Zoom Bombing - getting into a Zoom meeting and causing problems from shouting to sharing screens with potentially inappropriate content).

Other benefits include being able to call in using any phone to be able to hear what's going on.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,748
Location
Nottingham
Zoom is excellent (though less excellent than it was) for video calls and bridges, certainly a gazillion percent better than Webex, the sound and video quality of which continues to have an early 2000s-like vibe to it.

Teams.. now that the conferencing tech from Skype for Business is built-in, that bit works pretty well. It's a shame that the rest of the app appears to have had design input from half of Microsoft. The application tries to be all things to all people and as a result is almost impossible to intuitively navigate.
We went onto Teams not long before lockdown having used Webex before that. I don't notice much difference in sound and video quality and for conferencing Teams has some annoying features like the toolbar blocks part of the presenter's screen and can't be moved. I get the impression since lockdown they've been continuously tweaking it and throwing out new versions without necessarily testing them fully. It also needs much more control over notifications to get rid of the irrelevant distractions while still being alerted to what's important.

I received a consent request from Zoom despite not knowingly ever having used it - must have been one of several external webinars I've attended. From the questions it sounded like they were trying to harvest data to build themselves into a rival to LinkedIn.
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,694
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
I received a consent request from Zoom despite not knowingly ever having used it - must have been one of several external webinars I've attended. From the questions it sounded like they were trying to harvest data to build themselves into a rival to LinkedIn.

Even sneakier than that.

https://mashable.com/article/zoom-linkedin-data-collection/

Zoom was secretly mining LinkedIn data and sharing it with some users

It’s becoming pretty clear that Zoom was not ready for the influx of users it received due to the coronavirus pandemic.

The latest issue: the service was secretly collecting LinkedIn data and sharing personal information with certain users in Zoom meetings.

According to a report from the New York Times, when a user would enter a video conference, Zoom would take that person’s name and email address and run it through an internal system. This system would then match the name and email of the Zoom user with their LinkedIn profile information.

So, why was this such a problem? Zoom would take the LinkedIn profile data and connect it to the user’s Zoom account, allowing other people in the meeting to view the user’s real name, employer, job title, and location. Zoom did this without notifying the user or asking their permission. The video conferencing platform was able to match a user’s real LinkedIn profile with their Zoom name, even if they weren’t using their real name on the platform.
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
3,578
The company my wife works for had been using it a bit prior to lockdown but even then most had quite a steep learning curve for the more advanced features.

Whilst Teams had some good features I suspect that the reason Zoom is used quite a bit is that you can have others join without needing to have an account (although this also caused problems like Zoom Bombing - getting into a Zoom meeting and causing problems from shouting to sharing screens with potentially inappropriate content).

Other benefits include being able to call in using any phone to be able to hear what's going on.

Teams is fairly quickly catching up features-wise. It used to only handle 2x2 for videos, now it can do 7x7. If your organisation is appropriately configured you can invite anyone by email address rather than needing an account. I believe you should be able to dial into a Teams meeting with a normal phone call, though my organisation has that featured turned off.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,537
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Teams is fairly quickly catching up features-wise. It used to only handle 2x2 for videos, now it can do 7x7. If your organisation is appropriately configured you can invite anyone by email address rather than needing an account. I believe you should be able to dial into a Teams meeting with a normal phone call, though my organisation has that featured turned off.

Yes, I've dialled into a Teams meeting.

But Teams will continue to be rubbish for as long as M$ don't invest properly into its performance. It runs like a dog (an old one) and slows down any machine noticeably. The UI is terrible, too.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
16,246
Where I work we've got a new version of Teams, the toolbar has moved to the top of the screen. We're getting telephony added which will mean we will be able to dial into Teams meetings using an 0207 or 0800 number which can be useful at times (we currently have this functionality in Skype for Business but that is being retired soon by Microsoft)
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,748
Location
Nottingham
Where I work we've got a new version of Teams, the toolbar has moved to the top of the screen. We're getting telephony added which will mean we will be able to dial into Teams meetings using an 0207 or 0800 number which can be useful at times (we currently have this functionality in Skype for Business but that is being retired soon by Microsoft)
We have had telephony for some time (I guess that might be something that individual companies choose to subscribe to or not). :D if we get the relocated toolbar!
 

DelayRepay

Established Member
Joined
21 May 2011
Messages
2,929
We use Teams, and occasionally use Zoom.

I like Teams but I agree with @Bletchleyite about the performance. I'm not a techy person but my computer seems much slower when Teams is open, even if not taking part in a meeting. Which is a shame given the intent is obviously for Teams to be open all the time.

They are becoming more Zoom-like, according to their blog

Teams 1.png

(Image shows a screenshot of a Teams meeting with a 7 x 6 grid of participants).
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
3,578
I don't know how how much of Teams' poor performance is down to it being an Electron app. Which is basically Javascript (node.js) running in a dedicated instance of Chrome. This does have the advantage that it should be easily cross-platform, but is never going to be as efficient as a native application.
 

Peter C

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2018
Messages
4,624
Location
GWR land
Zoom is really good for these quizzes people have been doing with family and friends during lockdown - you can have two devices joined on the same call for as long as you want (more than two and it's a limit of 45 minutes). Note that it's devices, not people - that confused a friend when there were going to be six on one call but on two devices :D

-Peter
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,694
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
Zoom is really good for these quizzes people have been doing with family and friends during lockdown - you can have two devices joined on the same call for as long as you want (more than two and it's a limit of 45 minutes). Note that it's devices, not people - that confused a friend when there were going to be six on one call but on two devices :D

Have to admit I'm getting a bit tired of Zoom pub quizzes and Zoom beers and Zoom comedy nights and Zoom this-that-and-the-other. I spend six or seven hours of my working day on video calls and the last thing I want to do after closing the work laptop is open the personal one and fire up Zoom again :|
 

Peter C

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2018
Messages
4,624
Location
GWR land
Have to admit I'm getting a bit tired of Zoom pub quizzes and Zoom beers and Zoom comedy nights and Zoom this-that-and-the-other. I spend six or seven hours of my working day on video calls and the last thing I want to do after closing the work laptop is open the personal one and fire up Zoom again :|
I can understand what you mean :)
I've been doing the odd Zoom quiz and they're quite fun but computer problems often jump in when they're least expected!

-Peter
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
I get the impression since lockdown they've been continuously tweaking it and throwing out new versions without necessarily testing them fully.

That's standard Microsoft practice with everything as a matter of course! It's certainly not started recently.
 

pdq

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2010
Messages
849
At the start of lockdown my employer invested in Zoom licenses so they could control the settings at an enterprise level and provide integration with active directory and Outlook. We were already in the process of moving to Teams but they weren't quite there at the time.
We now have Teams working - but a lot of people are sticking with Zoom as it just works better an is easier to use. In particular for the way I work, Teams doesn't allow multi-screen use, where I can drag someone's shared screen to one monitor and still see the participants on another. We've also seen compatibility issues with cameras/graphics drivers that we don't see on Zoom. My Microsoft Surface Pro 3, for example, keeps losing its video on Teams but is fine with Teams.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
At the start of lockdown my employer invested in Zoom licenses so they could control the settings at an enterprise level and provide integration with active directory and Outlook. We were already in the process of moving to Teams but they weren't quite there at the time.
We now have Teams working - but a lot of people are sticking with Zoom as it just works better an is easier to use. In particular for the way I work, Teams doesn't allow multi-screen use, where I can drag someone's shared screen to one monitor and still see the participants on another. We've also seen compatibility issues with cameras/graphics drivers that we don't see on Zoom. My Microsoft Surface Pro 3, for example, keeps losing its video on Teams but is fine with Teams.

Not sure that many companies will stick with Zoom other than for the short to medium term - it gets very expensive for what it is if you have a lot of users, and Microsoft is closing the functionality gap between it and Teams. The performance of Teams has also improved over the past few months, although more improvement is still needed.
 

pdq

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2010
Messages
849
Not sure that many companies will stick with Zoom other than for the short to medium term - it gets very expensive for what it is if you have a lot of users, and Microsoft is closing the functionality gap between it and Teams. The performance of Teams has also improved over the past few months, although more improvement is still needed.
Indeed - we'll be ending our Zoom license by the end of the year I would think. I agree that the gap is closing - but it's not there yet. And the lower levels of Zoom subscriptions continue to be a reasonably priced option for societies/clubs etc to keep in touch with their members without worrying about the 45 minute cutoff, and for 1-1 music teaching for example. Zoom had the right product at the right time and now have a name that's become synonymous with mass market video conference.
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,694
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
Not sure that many companies will stick with Zoom other than for the short to medium term - it gets very expensive for what it is if you have a lot of users, and Microsoft is closing the functionality gap between it and Teams. The performance of Teams has also improved over the past few months, although more improvement is still needed.

We've been using Zoom quite happily it since late 2017, but with MS rapidly developing Teams I do wonder if our corporate Zoom usage will continue as Teams is already part of the wider MS 365 plan. Thankfully those decisions happen half the world away and several levels above my corner of the ..Zoom is a very well liked bit of software compared with Teams and it wouldn't be a popular thing to communicate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top