To get people back onto trains, then perhaps get rid of face coverings, or at least the requirement, altogether. Firstly, there is the matter of eating and drinking, if it's coming off for that then what's the point. Also it is less of an issue on trains but more on buses, that removing a face covering can betray the fact that someone is eating or drinking, maybe when they are not supposed to be.
Secondly, we have to get used to each other's faces again, and thirdly those of us who are passing on the ^jab^ think that it's about time to get used to it. Fourthly, enforcement is going to be nigh-on impossible in high-volume crowd-type situations.
Fifthly, there is the whole security issue - CCTV is much more useful when the whole face is uncovered.
======
Coming back to something that is slightly off-topic, and someone took my previous post the wrong way,
I don't think that's true at all. Do you get all of your home electrical equipment PAT tested? Do you have a fully automatic fire detection and monitoring system at home? Do you have a fire escape from whatever room you are using as an office?
Three random examples off the top of my head. If any company cited "well, it's good enough for a domestic environment so it's good enough for work" they'd find themselves hauled over the coals.
Indeed, it's a bit of a grey area and I'm sure we will start to see some test cases before too long. "I had an accident at work, my employer failed to keep me safe/carry out a risk assessment/allowed me to work in a hazardous environment", with the workplace being the employees home. Employer *should* be risk assessing and taking measures to mitigate, but I bet very few do.
On that point, it depends on whether or not it is a BYOD (bring-your-own-device) environment. Believe it or not, where I am at nothing has been PAT tested and I'm not even remotely bothered. Even on the matter of my sister's employer's laptop (that she uses in the same house), I don't think that has been PAT tested either. Such events have proved to be very rare with desk-based home working generally - otherwise it would have been in the news by now.
=======
Coming back to the main topic,
What we cannot have is those who are worried about catching the coronavirus after having had at least the opportunity to be vaccinated, complaining that they are "scared" when they see someone without a ^mask^, dictating things when their concerns no longer have a basis in reality (even if they did a few months - or even a few weeks - ago). In fact, mandates based on unjustified (or no-longer-justified) fear are psychologically poisonous to leisure travel, especially on the train.