We are all both pro-life, and pro-choice at the same time, we all believe mothers should be able to choose how many children they have, and we believe it is wrong to kill.
The eternal argument is all down to two timings...
1, When is the last time a mother should be able to choose?
Views vary, some say before conception, some say after birth, most say 8-24 weeks, There's no right answer.
2, When is a human life created?
Again views vary, and you'll never find a satisfactory answer.
So the Abortion/Anti-Abortion argument will never be won, and if it is, it will be the wrong answer as the situation is more complex.
But this thread is about, whether or not Downs Syndrome people are discriminated against, with the routine screening and encouraged later abortions of their type allowed at later times in the pregnancy? I know two people with Downs, they are kind, happy / sad as anyone else.
This world is all too keen on getting rid of people not liked, kids in orphanages, elderly in care homes, criminals in prison, Mentally ill in "institutions" etc. We are all guilty is wishing people would disappear, but can anyone here look a Downs Syndrome person in the face and say it's worse for a "normal baby" to be aborted at 25 weeks than a Downs baby?
It's eugenics, and no matter how it's sugar-coated it is always ugly when sections of society are killed solely because of their genetics.