• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Trainline Does New Deal with RDG for its Ticket Sales Commission

Status
Not open for further replies.

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,042
Location
Mold, Clwyd
There's this curious item about Trainline, which indicates it has done a deal with RDG on commission on ticket sales.
The indication I've seen elsewhere is that it will be able to sell tickets in parallel with GBR when that booking engine starts up, instead of being squeezed out by the monopoly supplier as was feared.
Trouble is, this is a stock market view, not a rail industry view.
Shares in Trainline leapt after a smaller than expected cut to its commission rates.
The ticket seller jumped 26.1 per cent, or 51.8p, to 250p after it agreed to lower the commission it receives from its sales by 0.5 percentage points from 5 per cent to 4.5 per cent.
The deal was struck with the Rail Delivery Group (RDG), an industry body that represents UK train operators.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,060
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
There's this curious item about Trainline, which indicates it has done a deal with RDG on commission on ticket sales.
The indication I've seen elsewhere is that it will be able to sell tickets in parallel with GBR when that booking engine starts up, instead of being squeezed out by the monopoly supplier as was feared.

I can't see any need to squeeze anyone out. Other than Ryanair who tries to avoid it, there are plenty of third party airline sales sites.

The efficiency is gained by having one "TOC" booking site instead of about 15 different ones plus the NRE non-selling planner.
 

plugwash

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2015
Messages
1,795
The question with any middleman is does the value they bring in terms of extra customers make up for what they take in commissions from people who would buy the product anyway.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,036
Location
Bolton
Rolling out pay as you go more quickly would be a great way to deprive trainline of more commission. Just saying.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
16,051
Given that much of the general public believe that trainline is the only place you can buy rail tickets RDG/GBR would be foolish to get rid of them.
 
Joined
7 Jan 2009
Messages
946
So, no fingerprints of Ministers? They just let RDG strike a new commercial agreement here notwithstanding their promise to create a single national ticketing app?!! Either RDG will commission its own or it will let Trainline provide that service on a 'white label' basis....either way, Ministers would need to sign off the costs involved.
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
4,253
Competition is always good, not least when the National Rail website shows just how dreadful a lack of choice would look like.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,060
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Competition is always good, not least when the National Rail website shows just how dreadful a lack of choice would look like.

The NRE site looks a bit dated, but in terms of (non-split) fares it finds it's the best in the business. I don't think any other site knows and suggests Rovers, for example.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
19,951
So, no fingerprints of Ministers? They just let RDG strike a new commercial agreement here notwithstanding their promise to create a single national ticketing app?!!
There is not a chance that RDG could sign this off without DfT approval.
 
Joined
7 Jan 2009
Messages
946
There is not a chance that RDG could sign this off without DfT approval.
So, is the expectation not being created that Ministers will want Trainline to be the single national system in due course....? The NRE system was set up only to provide information on fares, not to sell them so would require quite a few $$$ spent on it to switch it over being a retail site. Not least on making it easier to use and sprucing up its design...
 

matt_world2004

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2014
Messages
4,578
Couldn't the government take one of the many tocs websites that retail tickets. Benchmark them on features and run it as their own..particularly if it's an site run by the OLR
 

bakerstreet

Member
Joined
29 Nov 2009
Messages
1,066
Location
-
Is there a possibility that Trainline may be the only GBR provider and therefore, for before the day purchases, fees will be the norm. I do hope market innovation (eg TrainSplit) will be allowed to continue. And individual TOC sites for that matter, providing greater robustness in the system. And that fees do not become difficult or impossible to avoid
 
Last edited:

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
4,049

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,060
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Is there a possibility that Trainline may be the only GBR provider and therefore, for before the day purchases, fees will be the norm. I do hope market innovation (eg TrainSplit) will be allowed to continue. And individual TOC sites for that matter, providing greater robustness in the system. And that fees do not become difficult or impossible to avoid

Individual TOC sites are a waste of money and a source of confusion. It's dropping these where you get a gain from a single system. The NRE system should be replaced with a system that sells tickets. As it's already effectively owned by DfT and has some nice features, the LNER one is probably the one to go for, with some tweaks, but no doubt they'll commission a new one.

Third party for-profit sites can and should continue if they wish, just as third party for-profit sites exist for selling airline tickets and indeed tickets for the European nationalised operations. Some people prefer them. If they make a profit they will continue, if not they will close.
 

m00036

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2020
Messages
214
Location
Camberley
Individual TOC sites are a waste of money and a source of confusion. It's dropping these where you get a gain from a single system. The NRE system should be replaced with a system that sells tickets. As it's already effectively owned by DfT and has some nice features, the LNER one is probably the one to go for, with some tweaks, but no doubt they'll commission a new one.

Third party for-profit sites can and should continue if they wish, just as third party for-profit sites exist for selling airline tickets and indeed tickets for the European nationalised operations. Some people prefer them. If they make a profit they will continue, if not they will close.
As ever, simplification in this way is likely to increase the minimum fare and not affect the median fare paid for a given journey as there are small differences between valid routes and fares at present across the website (which is obviously beneficial to the customer that shops around). Whether there should be is a different question, although I think we're agreed that there are plenty of grey areas surrounding ticketing.
 

Chris999999

Member
Joined
22 Jun 2010
Messages
238
As it's already effectively owned by DfT and has some nice features, the LNER one is probably the one to go for, with some tweaks, but no doubt they'll commission a new one.
Perhaps they should base it on the Avanti one, then hardly anyone will be able to buy the ticket they want and £Billions can be saved by not running trains.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,638
Perhaps they should base it on the Avanti one, then hardly anyone will be able to buy the ticket they want and £Billions can be saved by not running trains.
Quite. One can imagine the reaction of Sir Alan Sugar if one of the teams on an episode of "The Apprentice" had come up with a user-interface as sub-optimal as that encountered when using an Avanti TVM. :rolleyes:

We digress slightly from the thread topic, however.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top