• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Railway Industrial Disputes Mk2

Status
Not open for further replies.

43066

On Moderation
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
11,726
Location
London
Apart from previous strikes & the like, I always think of the aftermath of Hatfield in 2000. Month upon month of a decimated long distance train service across the entire UK with hundreds of miles of 20mph running due to GCC. A few decent advertising campaigns & some eye catching offers soon had the public back on board in their droves & numbers along with revenue soon went back into growth again.

I’d forgotten that. Agreed that’s a better example!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,230
Location
Bolton
Whilst previous strikes might not have affected passengers' habits of using the railways, this is a bit different now. If there are many strikes, then commuters mostly have the infrastructure to work from home now, employers will get ever more used to it, and when the likely 10% ticket price rises for next year are announced, many will just not see the price Vs reliability as worth it, and will likely not go back to regular commuting.

Leisure travellers might be less affected, granted. But the backbone of many lines is commuting, and right now I know many who are just bothering less and less due to the poor reliability, and strikes only add to that.
Of course, if the government sticks with the RPI +1 formula (which is of course wrong but unfortunately they love using obsolete measures for some reason), its likely that the rise for "regulated" fares will be 12 - 13%.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,100
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
I’m the *last* person to defend OTT Covid nonsense. However it strikes me as completely wrong to single out the railway unions for behaving in the same way as every single other union, and indeed merely acting in accordance with government advice.
I wonder why the rail unions took any notice of "government advice" at any time noting their normally vehemanently expressed disbelief of any governmental statements that are put forward.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,845
Of course, if the government sticks with the RPI +1 formula (which is of course wrong but unfortunately they love using obsolete measures for some reason), its likely that the rise for "regulated" fares will be 12 - 13%.
Indeed, it's very odd that we're told that RPI is unreliable and so is no longer used. Except when it comes to fares rises apparently.
 

exbrel

Member
Joined
24 Aug 2018
Messages
195
My earnings are irrelevant to the point I was making - you’ll notice my comment was also agreed with by another member of staff.

You’re no doubt blissfully unaware of the current situation but many members of current rail staff, including very modestly paid ones, feel the need to take action now to stave off long term erosion of their pay and Ts and Cs. Does the phrase “short term pain for long term gain” mean anything to you?

If you really did thirty years on the railway, did you never take part in industrial action yourself? Perhaps you were one of those who were happy to take the perks but looks down your nose at those fighting to defend them?
And a decent pension, and a job you said you did for decades, which has presumably set you up for retirement?

As I said, the staff I know fully agree with the sentiment I expressed. Trust me you’re in no position to know Search better than they.

What did you do on the railway yourself, out of interest? Maybe some of your current colleagues still working in the industry can give you some direct feedback on your views on their approach to taking industrial action.

This attitude of “people who expect customers to come back shouldn’t work in the industry” of course comes from people who have an axe to grind and *wish* passengers wouldn’t return! It is a simple reality that railway passengers have come back after every strike ever. It’s intriguing how much that simple statement of reality irritates some on here.

They’re also continuing to come back after Covid. I’ve just passed through a thronging London Bridge. I guess I must have imagined the hoards of people piling on and off full and standing thameslink trains. After all we know from this forum the railway is busily carting around fresh air and needs to close. :D.
---------------------------------------------------------

i've no idea on railway pay, and i don't believe the newspaper quotes on it, but i do expect that they are paid reasonably well, but in the present situation do you honestly believe that 10% is viable or reachable? Now the unions by nature are labour orientated, so by asking for 10% and no compulsory redundencies are playing on their members feelings, because no sane unionist would expect a government be it conservative or labour to give that sort of rise in the present situation...because as is now happening other unions are putting claims in. in my time on the railways i went on strike once for a week, and that was a dispute over grades, which i didn't agree with, but i followed my local rep's advice, any other disputes that arose were solved by local discussions.
this above paragraph is part of my reply, but i pressed the wrong button- a age thingy...

Also my pension, i had to pay tax on then and now, and a family and mortgage was not easy, but i'm still here and thankful that i don't have to claim any benefits.
Finally has a service industry the railways depends a great deal on passengers, but every dispute/disruption looses some. have you ever heard the saying "the final straw that broke the camels back"
 
Last edited:

footprints

Member
Joined
28 Feb 2017
Messages
223
Liz Truss' proposals regarding rail strikes are being reported today as follows:
  • Introduce minimum service levels during strikes affecting critical national infrastructure such as railways and hospitals.
  • Raise the minimum proportion of workers required to back a strike ballot for industrial action to be legal from 40 per cent of those eligible to vote to 50 per cent.
  • Increase the minimum notice period for strikes to four weeks, up from two weeks at present.
  • End unions being able to strike as many times as they like in the six months after a ballot.
  • Stop members receiving tax-free payments from trade unions on strike days.
She is promising to table this as primary legislation in her first 30 days in office.
RMT have responded with predictable fire and fury.
“If these proposals become law, there will be the biggest resistance mounted by the entire trade union movement, rivalling the general strike of 1926, the Suffragettes and Chartism.”
https://www.rmt.org.uk/news/rmt-will-fiercely-resist-further-attacks-on-trades-unions/
 

Thermal

Member
Joined
10 Nov 2019
Messages
36
Location
UK
  • Raise the minimum proportion of workers required to back a strike ballot for industrial action to be legal from 40 per cent of those eligible to vote to 50 per cent.

Liz Truss only obtained 45% of her own constituencies vote. More people didn't want her than did. If 50% is deemed the fair level for workers, it should also be the fair level for MP's too.
 

jettofab

Member
Joined
2 May 2020
Messages
56
Location
North West
I wonder why the rail unions took any notice of "government advice" at any time noting their normally vehemanently expressed disbelief of any governmental statements that are put forward.

This kind of rhetoric belongs in the Daily Mail. It is not constructive and is aggressively dismissive of the realities of both ongoing work by reps and the work they did particularly at the start, but throughout, the pandemic.

I'll only bite once but best of luck with the rest of your fishing trip.
 

winks

Member
Joined
11 Jun 2009
Messages
603

Rail unions rejected last-minute pay deal that would have averted strikes​

RMT union pay deal train strike UK rail travel chaos cost-of-living crisis
The RMT rejected a last-minute pay deal CREDIT: MARTIN POPE/GETTY IMAGES
26 JULY 2022 • 1:36PM

The Rail, Maritime and Transport workers union (RMT) rejected a last-minute improved pay deal to avoid strike action that will this week heap fresh misery for beleaguered commuters.
Network Rail, the state-backed owner of tracks and stations, committed to an additional no-strings-attached 2pc increase late last week - on top of the 6pc already offered, The Telegraph has learnt.
The offer, which would have led to a 4pc pay rise for this year and next, was well-received by RMT negotiator Eddie Dempsey, industry sources said.
One claimed that the sentiment from Mr Dempsey was that “we can see a way through it and are prepared to postpone the strikes”.
But the proposals were rejected by the RMT ruling executive after they were put forward by Mr Dempsey.
“They have marched us up the hill and down again,” the source added. “The RMT executive seems intent on resurrecting the trade union movement in force.”
A spokesman for the RMT said: “We were optimistic about making enough progress to suspend strike action.
“However that evaporated when Network Rail hardened their position on attacking our members conditions of work and even threatening to put compulsory redundancies back on the table.”


Not sure what to make of this article, an additional 2pc? Well received by Eddie Dempsey apprently.
 
Last edited:

yoyothehobo

Member
Joined
21 Aug 2015
Messages
699
Liz Truss' proposals regarding rail strikes are being reported today as follows:
  • Introduce minimum service levels during strikes affecting critical national infrastructure such as railways and hospitals.
  • Raise the minimum proportion of workers required to back a strike ballot for industrial action to be legal from 40 per cent of those eligible to vote to 50 per cent.
  • Increase the minimum notice period for strikes to four weeks, up from two weeks at present.
  • End unions being able to strike as many times as they like in the six months after a ballot.
  • Stop members receiving tax-free payments from trade unions on strike days.

Not going to lie, the Tory membership and moderate Tories will absolutely love that stance. You would probably convince many middle ground floating voters with that.

I think the RMT will have to be very careful here...
 

Smidster

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2014
Messages
583
I really don't see anything particularly problematic in that list from Truss bar the one around a maximum number of days.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,133
Indeed, it's very odd that we're told that RPI is unreliable and so is no longer used. Except when it comes to fares rises apparently.
I think they will still use RPI plus 12% and use increases in wage for union demands as a reason why. Have to be careful to avoid a PR backlash there.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
11,702
Location
Salford Quays, Manchester
Liz Truss' proposals regarding rail strikes are being reported today as follows:


Not going to lie, the Tory membership and moderate Tories will absolutely love that stance. You would probably convince many middle ground floating voters with that.

I think the RMT will have to be very careful here...
Fantastic list. I’ve never had great opinions of Truss, but these proposals are very promising.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
18,010
Location
East Anglia
Could you help a union lay-person out? So some drivers are in RMT union, but all drivers are in ASLEF union?
Very few drivers are in RMT. The vast majority if not all at most depots would be ASLEF.
 
Last edited:

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,230
Location
Bolton
Could you help a union lay-person out? So some drivers are in RMT union, but all drivers are in ASLEF union?
Generally it's only a small handful of drivers who are in RMT, usually as they were previously working in a role where RMT are the mainstream and they simply continued their membership.
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,765
Liz Truss' proposals regarding rail strikes are being reported today as follows:


Not going to lie, the Tory membership and moderate Tories will absolutely love that stance. You would probably convince many middle ground floating voters with that.

I think the RMT will have to be very careful here...
I wonder what they propose to be a minimum service level? Despite the strikes tomorrow, 20% of services will still run
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,230
Location
Bolton
But some lines have no service at all.
Yes, the way that the minimum service level works is that the it removes the lawful protections from the industrial action if they're not met. They would be likely to be set at around 70% of the normal level of service.

Of course, you can still go on an unlawful strike, sometimes called a wildcat strike, but you can't then rely on the lawful protections of breaking your contract.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,845
Liz Truss' proposals regarding rail strikes are being reported today as follows:


Not going to lie, the Tory membership and moderate Tories will absolutely love that stance. You would probably convince many middle ground floating voters with that.

I think the RMT will have to be very careful here...
That will all require primary legislation, as did the Trade Union Act 2016, which takes time, particularly with draft legislation having to be written regarding minimum service levels and what exactly the definition of that is.

It's not something which is going to impact on the current dispute and I'm sure that even if all action was suddenly called off now PM Truss would still proceed with her proposals.
 
Last edited:

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,100
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
This kind of rhetoric belongs in the Daily Mail. It is not constructive and is aggressively dismissive of the realities of both ongoing work by reps and the work they did particularly at the start, but throughout, the pandemic.

I'll only bite once but best of luck with the rest of your fishing trip.
How is it that that so many people on the left-leaning side of the political spectrum appear so well versed in the viewpoints that they associate with the Daily Mail? I would have thought that their political views meant that particular newspaper would have been the last one that they would read.
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,765
How is it that that so many people on the left-leaning side of the political spectrum appear so well versed in the viewpoints that they associate with the Daily Mail? I would have thought that their political views meant that particular newspaper would have been the last one that they would read.
I don't read it .....but I'm well aware of the anti rail agenda it has. An awareness brought about by the age of the internet and social media.
 

Bluejays

Member
Joined
19 Sep 2017
Messages
570
This kind of rhetoric belongs in the Daily Mail. It is not constructive and is aggressively dismissive of the realities of both ongoing work by reps and the work they did particularly at the start, but throughout, the pandemic.

I'll only bite once but best of luck with the rest of your fishing trip.
I know it's tempting, but don't feed the troll :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top