There isn’t any pressing need to replace her portrait with Charles. I think that’s something that’ll just come gradually as old money is withdrawn from circulation and new money introduced in the usual timeframe. Not inconceivable seeing the age of some of the coins in circulation today that there’ll still be some coins in circulation with her portrait in the 2040s.One related point: is it just me, or would it be appropriate to leave her on banknotes?/coins I think she deserves a grand and significant gesture, and I wouldn't have any objection to commemorating her reign by having her remain on all the banknotes/coins.
I'm a bellringer too. We'll be putting the muffles on this weekend, it looks like a busy couple of weeks.That’s impressive!
My grandfather rang the bells at St Paul’s for her coronation. Unfortunately he passed away long before I was born but my grandmother had a photo in the hall (which I think my father must still have somewhere) of him meeting the Queen Mother after the event.
We still had Queen Victoria pennies in circulation in the 1960s.There isn’t any pressing need to replace her portrait with Charles. I think that’s something that’ll just come gradually as old money is withdrawn from circulation and new money introduced in the usual timeframe. Not inconceivable seeing the age of some of the coins in circulation today that there’ll still be some coins in circulation with her portrait in the 2040s.
Decimalization did for many of the old coins but I remember some old George VI Florins and Shillings carried on as 5 and 10 pence pieces until smaller coins were introduced in the 90s.There isn’t any pressing need to replace her portrait with Charles. I think that’s something that’ll just come gradually as old money is withdrawn from circulation and new money introduced in the usual timeframe. Not inconceivable seeing the age of some of the coins in circulation today that there’ll still be some coins in circulation with her portrait in the 2040s.
I remember the death of King George VI. Also, as a member of the School ACF, lining the road and presenting arms (with a WWI Lee Enfield rifle) on a visit by her few weeks after the coronation. I am not old!No you have to be pretty old, like my Ma, to remember a monarch before Elizabeth II.
One related point: is it just me, or would it be appropriate to leave her on banknotes?/coins I think she deserves a grand and significant gesture, and I wouldn't have any objection to commemorating her reign by having her remain on all the banknotes/coins.
Why are people so obsessed with Harry & Meghan?I just hope Prince Harry has the decency to cancel his autobiography, and tell his wife that a long period of silence on her part would be most welcome.
Why are people so obsessed with Harry & Meghan?
This thread is about Queen Elizabeth.
always look at/ look for the motive of the person / organization carrying the news...GB News has been particularly enraged that Meghan 'didn't bother' to go. Seems they're quite happy to ensure they keep Meghan in the(ir) news cycle every single day. I wouldn't be surprised if some don't claim that she had something to do with the Queen passing.
always look at/ look for the motive of the person / organization carrying the news...
hmmm, point well made I suspect.Oh, it's as clear as rain why they have a problem with her.. and why they didn't mention that Kate didn't go either. Funny that.
And presumably if she went, she would be intruding on an intimate family moment?GB News has been particularly enraged that Meghan 'didn't bother' to go. Seems they're quite happy to ensure they keep Meghan in the(ir) news cycle every single day. I wouldn't be surprised if some don't claim that she had something to do with the Queen passing.
And presumably if she went, she would be intruding on an intimate family moment?
However, I am confident that they instilled into our present monarch and his heir apparent the sense of duty that they showed throughout their lives, just as it was instilled into Elizabeth II by her parents, George VI and the Queen Mother. I am convinced that their legacy will live on in their successors.A true servant of the country and the like of which we will not see again. Her and Philip were the last public figures of their kind. RIP, and God Save The King.
Her health may have been deteriorating for some time. We knew about her mobility because that was clear, she had been using a stick, and would go some way to disguise other factors. Both Johnson and Truss (on winning the election) would probably have been advised of her health and, credit to them, it did not leak out. Princess Anne has been in Balmoral for over a week. If there were suspicions that Elizabeth IIs health was on the wane, she was the right one to be close by. Much less publicity than Charles or William. All of this is pure speculation, of course.While the passing of Her Majesty was inevitable, I was rather shocked to hear that her health had gone downhill very quickly, with the announcement just a couple of days after she seemed well while meeting with the new prime minister at Balmoral. While she lived to a very good old age (not many people make it to 96), I was somewhat confident until yesterday afternoon that she would make it to her 100th birthday, or even surpass the age of the Queen Mother when she died.
Pedantry, but important all the same: she was styled Her Majesty from the moment of ascension onwards.RIP HRH Queen Elizabeth II