Really? The flights will still operate but from a different airport. People will still use those flights and some passengers will now have to travel further and drive there. The land may be used for houses and commercial use which will use energy and create traffic.A great shame for the local area, but .... and environmentally the correct decision.
[cynic] Peel have got what they wanted all along. A site, with excellent transport links (by which I mean, a purpose built road off the M18) paid for with public money, which is ripe to be made into an industrial development. Open an existing airport; do nothing whatsoever to encourage airlines to actually use it; charge high fees; etc. And then, when airlines fail to arrive in any quantity and those that do start pulling out, do nothing to save them. Deem it uneconomic and refuse public assistance. Close it. Redevelop it as was intended all along. [/cynic]
Wouldn't such an alliance simply have hastened the demise of DSA, by making airlines attractive offers to re-locate to other airports they controlled? Manchester and EMA are probably far enough apart for that to be less of an issue, but I think DSA was doomed from the start by having several better-established airports within a reasonable distance of the population it served.Manchester and East Midlands have common ownership. A shame DSA couldn't have been part of a northern alliance working together.
Wouldn't such an alliance simply have hastened the demise of DSA, by offering airlines attractive offers to re-locate to other airports they controlled? Manchester and EMA are probably far enough apart for that to be less of an issue, but I think DSA was doomed from the start by having several better-established airports within a reasonable distance of the population it served.
Will they?Really? The flights will still operate but from a different airport.
That's quite the logical stretch that closing an airport will increase the burden on the environment, and that the lowest impact use of the land in Finningley is...an international airport!People will still use those flights and some passengers will now have to travel further and drive there. The land may be used for houses and commercial use which will use energy and create traffic.
There are indeed far too many international airports on our fairly small island of Great Britain. We have 22. Twenty two!Wouldn't such an alliance simply have hastened the demise of DSA, by offering airlines attractive offers to re-locate to other airports they controlled? Manchester and EMA are probably far enough apart for that to be less of an issue, but I think DSA was doomed from the start by having several better-established airports within a reasonable distance of the population it served.
Is it even needed for that? There are at least five other commercial airports within 30min flying time, as well as some smaller ones that cater for general aviation only. Other than around London and at Manchester there doesn't seem to be significant pressure on runway capacity. There is a good range of RAF bases across eastern England, and I can't really see an airport being kept mothballed in case of a defence need. If there really was a national emergency requiring more airport capacity, then commercial airports could be commandeered and their flights cancelled.The demographics were always going to be against it. Sparsely populated, low income hinterland. Best used for diverted flights, private aircraft, bulk freight - and as a reserve for defence. Needs maintaining for those, not regular passenger flights.
It is indeed doomed. How it got so much support on hope and wishful thinking over evidence and common sense says a lot about the way we approach many big ticket projects.Is it even needed for that? There are at least five other commercial airports within 30min flying time, as well as some smaller ones that cater for general aviation only. Other than around London and at Manchester there doesn't seem to be significant pressure on runway capacity. There is a good range of RAF bases across eastern England, and I can't really see an airport being kept mothballed in case of a defence need. If there really was a national emergency requiring more airport capacity, then commercial airports could be commandeered and their flights cancelled.
Yes, TUI have already announced an increase in flights from Leeds Bradford in 2023.Will they?
Didnt Carlisle have loganair towards Dublin? How come it was dropped?Doncaster Airport was built at the wrong time, when it opened in 2005 regional airport were thriving. Then came the increase in airport security costs after 7/7 and the financial crash both of which severely affected regional airports.
Doncaster will now join Blackpool, Brighton, Plymouth, Gloucestershire, Coventry, Sheffield City, Oxford, Cambridge, Manston, Lydd, Carlisle, Swansea and Anglesey in the category of airport which offered scheduled flights in the past 20 years but don't anymore.
Didnt Carlisle have loganair towards Dublin? How come it was dropped?
They aren’t replicating capacity. Their plans represent a significant capacity loss overall. DSA was uncompetitive for a reason.Yes, TUI have already announced an increase in flights from Leeds Bradford in 2023.
Doncaster Airport was built at the wrong time, when it opened in 2005 regional airport were thriving. Then came the increase in airport security costs after 7/7 and the financial crash both of which severely affected regional airports.
Doncaster will now join Blackpool, Brighton, Plymouth, Gloucestershire, Coventry, Sheffield City, Oxford, Cambridge, Manston, Lydd, Carlisle, Swansea and Anglesey in the category of airport which offered scheduled flights in the past 20 years but don't anymore.
One thing that I think is clear: we need to really find a way to move out of the current airport security model. It's such a labour intensive, expensive and space-consuming system, and I find it unreal that we still haven't found a way for people to simply chuck their bags/cases onto a conveyor belt and walk through without hassle. If we could improve that, then regional airports will become more competitive again.
It's still cheap enough to be able to fly across Europe for a few tends of pounds. I don't think anyone can seriously claim that excessive fares are deterring the use of the types of airlines that have flown from DSA.One thing that I think is clear: we need to really find a way to move out of the current airport security model. It's such a labour intensive, expensive and space-consuming system, and I find it unreal that we still haven't found a way for people to simply chuck their bags/cases onto a conveyor belt and walk through without hassle. If we could improve that, then regional airports will become more competitive again.
It's still cheap enough to be able to fly across Europe for a few tends of pounds. I don't think anyone can seriously claim that excessive fares are deterring the use of the types of airlines that have flown from DSA.
Bucharest isn’t a good example to pick. That flight exists because of Romanian seasonal workers and friends and family traffic, and is not discretionary or tourist traffic.In simple terms you can't really imagine people from Bucharest (the busiest destination from Doncaster) planning a visit to Doncaster or Sheffield for that matter. They just aren't really touristy places.
Bucharest isn’t a good example to pick. That flight exists because of Romanian seasonal workers and friends and family traffic, and is not discretionary or tourist traffic.
The Airport serviced direct flights by East European Air Companies, the town became a hot spot for East Europeans, several areas of the town have been taken over by those immigrants.I only mentioned it because it was the largest destination. The next on the list are Katowice and Gdansk which I assume are up there for the same reasons.
The point was though that Doncaster isn't really a tourist type town.
I know the town very well, one of the poorest / low-opportunity towns in England, there is (or was) a thriving Tourist Industry....Benefit Tourism.I only mentioned it because it was the largest destination. The next on the list are Katowice and Gdansk which I assume are up there for the same reasons.
The point was though that Doncaster isn't really a tourist type town.
The technology exists but not the funding and/or will to deploy it. See for example Evolv Express.One thing that I think is clear: we need to really find a way to move out of the current airport security model. It's such a labour intensive, expensive and space-consuming system, and I find it unreal that we still haven't found a way for people to simply chuck their bags/cases onto a conveyor belt and walk through without hassle. If we could improve that, then regional airports will become more competitive again.
The technology exists but not the funding and/or will to deploy it. See for example Evolv Express.
The Airport serviced direct flights by East European Air Companies, the town became a hot spot for East Europeans, several areas of the town have been taken over by those immigrants.
There is considerable ill feeling in the town, the town voted 2 to 3 for Brexit, the traditionally Labour town even elected a far-right Mayor in 2012. the English Democrat Party candidate
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
I know the town very well, one of the poorest / low-opportunity towns in England, there is (or was) a thriving Tourist Industry....Benefit Tourism.
It was 2009 when Doncaster elected Peter Davies as mayor, it was just after the expenses scandal when Labour was doing badly everywhere. He narrowly lost reelection in 2013.
That is another story altogether though.
Brexit has made a big difference to the market for travel to Eastern Europe.