O L Leigh
Established Member
They will want committed Sundays rather than Sundays inside, for this reason.
Committed Sundays won’t save any money. Well, not unless you have a particularly bad issue with cherry picking.
They will want committed Sundays rather than Sundays inside, for this reason.
There is way too much money sloshing around the system which is why we have had massive house price inflation, and partly the reason why inflation is high - its not all imported as the Bank of England made clear when putting up interest rates. Interest payments on government debt is now rising significantly
This ^I think it’s only a matter of time before ticket offices at many stations either a) disappear completely or b) are changed to a multi-disciplinary role. This is one change, that, certainly in the long-run, is only going to go one way due to the change in demographics and technology.
The government paid to keep the railway at full employment during Covid, and now it has to balance the books.
They made that choice to keep keyworkers moving, although in hindsight not many did.
They also payed millions of people 80% of their wages to sit at home tossing it off, their pay and conditions aren't now paying the consequences now.
How much of a service reduction on Mondays and Fridays would be needed to get Sundays inside the working week and keep the establishment as is?The issue with this being it probably wont save money; in fact the likely increase in establishment - unless they reduce M-F rostered diagrams fairly considerable - will probably cost more. I agree it should be formalised into a 7-day week everywhere but you can’t have your cake and eat it.
Not everyone is feeling the pinch. Some people are managing just fine. I don't know why this one keeps getting wheeled out.I'm not sure that I agree. I think that they might be cutting their own throats. The electorate may not care much about (ahem) "greedy railstaff", but they may be more sympathetic towards other striking professions. Lets not forget that everyone is feeling the pinch right now, whoever they are and whatever they do, and I'm not sure how much support the Conservatives can count on come polling day.
As a rail user rather than an employee I'd consider that closing ticket offices would be a seriously retrograde step and would certainly make travel more difficult for a not inconsidersble proportion of the population if my local station is anything to go by.
The issue with this being it probably wont save money; in fact the likely increase in establishment - unless they reduce M-F rostered diagrams fairly considerable - will probably cost more. I agree it should be formalised into a 7-day week everywhere but you can’t have your cake and eat it.
I think it’s only a matter of time before ticket offices at many stations either a) disappear completely or b) are changed to a multi-disciplinary role. This is one change, that, certainly in the long-run, is only going to go one way due to the change in demographics and technology.
Committed Sundays won’t save any money. Well, not unless you have a particularly bad issue with cherry picking.
The RMT have adopted an approach of "nothing is resolved until everything is resolved",
The ticket offices is not the battle the RMT will win especially when you consider they tried striking over that when TfL decided to do away with ticket offices on the London Underground and those ended up closing anyway.This ^
The RMT have adopted an approach of "nothing is resolved until everything is resolved", which quite simply means that unless the DfT agree to keep ticket offices open this dispute will drag on forever. I completely agree with the above comments that they're going anyway, and getting staff into multipurpose roles with a future really ought to be something that a union can turn into a positive discussion.
Sooner or later the guards and every other grade are going to have to start asking questions of their union leaders about how their individual aspects of the disupute are being resolved, as otherwise it does seem that there's no prospect of an end in sight.
How much of a service reduction on Mondays and Fridays would be needed to get Sundays inside the working week and keep the establishment as is?
Could the current Saturday service on Friday, Saturday and Monday work?
Picket line? It sounds like something from the 1980s. Why do they need a picket line in this day and age?I’m not sure that’s true - that’s certainly not what my colleagues on a picket line reported yesterday. In any case, it isn’t about public sympathy. You’ll also note that public sympathy for the government (across many, many areas) is also dropping.
Picket line? It sounds like something from the 1980s. Why do they need a picket line in this day and age?
How much of a service reduction on Mondays and Fridays would be needed to get Sundays inside the working week and keep the establishment as is?
Could the current Saturday service on Friday, Saturday and Monday work?
As a rail user rather than an employee I'd consider that closing ticket offices would be a seriously retrograde step and would certainly make travel more difficult for a not inconsidersble proportion of the population if my local station is anything to go by.
Heard some of the suggested reforms which have been suggested by the RDG in their talks with the RMT include things like DOO , Sunday working committment accross the board , catering only operating when it is profitable , booking offices closing and station grades being merged into 1 grade to name a few .Again much of this lays with Network Rail. Like you I’ve heard nothing of reforms working for a TOC.
There for me is a more troubling aspect to these "negotiations" if you can call them that . The DFT is essentially trying to negotiate a framework agreement and set payrise that will apply to all TOC's . But accross the industry there are multiple sets of T's&C's for the same grades . Its obvious you'll never be able to get unanimous agreement to a framework agreement like this .The whole negotiation is a shambles. "Agree to these reforms before we talk about pay." There is nothing stopping them from saying "Thanks for agreeing. You get nothing. We can't afford it." Just look at how they treat other public sector workers and its obvious why this tactic is being resisted so heavily. I cannot see why both cannot be negotiated together as a package.
If it avoids increasing driver establishment levels it certainly will save money, certainly moreso than bringing Sundays inside, across the board.
Not everyone is feeling the pinch. Some people are managing just fine. I don't know why this one keeps getting wheeled out.
A policy reversed by Hunt and replaced by tax increases for the 45% tax payers.The last two years have show the money is there where it’s deemed politically necessary. The “there’s no money” line is trotted out when it suits, along with the spurious idea that pay rises are inflationary so must be resisted, yet unfunded tax cuts to 50% tax payers somehow aren’t,
Except there is a limit to government borrowing, whether for expenditure or tax cuts, as Truss and Kwarteng found out when the markets rejected their policies, leading to chaos in the markets and interest rates shooting up.Exactly this. The government talks about money as if it arrives here from outer space in a cardboard box at irregular intervals. Ultimately the government controls the supply of money in our economy, whether that’s through borrowing, issuing bonds and gilts or ’quantitive easing’. They produced trillions of pounds from nothing to pay for dodgy unusable PPE, covid business loans, furlough and test & trace. If the government wishes to increase rail industry budgets then it is as simple as adding a few zeros to a number on an Excel spreadsheet somewhere.
There's a limit to how much they're prepared to borrow, which is not quite the same thing. And borrowing is just one mechanism for a government to obtain money. The policies of Truss and co are nothing to do with this.Except there is a limit to government borrowing, whether for expenditure or tax cuts, as Truss and Kwarteng found out when the markets rejected their policies, leading to chaos in the markets and interest rates shooting up.
As long as he keeps insisting on ‘reforms’ before moving forward I see no end in sight to the unrest.
We must remember that the point of appearing on a programme like this one is to speak not to those who know about the dispute but to speak to those who relay on the media/social media for their knowledge. This is the start of an attempt to win back he narrative by saying the strike is union intransigence rather than what we know to be the truth.I’ve yet to see any reforms tabled. No-ones even talking to us. Surely it’s pointless to continue to insist on something happening that appears not to even exist.
Agree with this. The RMT need to admit they aren’t winning this argument, especially when the data shows less passengers using Ticket Offices.The ticket offices is not the battle the RMT will win especially when you consider they tried striking over that when TfL decided to do away with ticket offices on the London Underground and those ended up closing anyway.
He was on Radio 4's Any Questions on Friday night too, saying that the DfT has nothing to do with the dispute and that it's up each of the TOCs to negotiate their own pay settlements. Which is, of course, a dreadful lie.Don't know if anyone else noticed but Harper was on the Andrew Neil show this evening (Channel 4 17:45). Mostly more of the same, but I'll say one thing for him, he does turn up and doesn't dodge (most of) the questions.
Especially if it's true that a potential deal was all but agreed this week, and could have been offered to members to vote, but someone above stepped in to stop it for fear of it giving hope/bargaining power to the NHS staff.He was on Radio 4's Any Questions on Friday night too, saying that the DfT has nothing to do with the dispute and that it's up each of the TOCs to negotiate their own pay settlements. Which is, of course, a dreadful lie.
I wouldn't be surprised if I'm not the first on here to say something like this: I'd get on board with ticket offices closing for national rail if the whole fares system was made simpler, self-service machines become more reliable and smart/e-tickets are well established and also reliable. TfL I think got away with it because of the ease of Oyster/contactless being widespread and well established, the rest of the rail network isn't there just yet.Agree with this. The RMT need to admit they aren’t winning this argument, especially when the data shows less passengers using Ticket Offices.
The “reform”issues (as the govt puts it) seem far more concerned with NR than the TOCS.
But would remove barbeque Sundays which what the Government wants to stop.Correct, but only in as much as it’s cheaper than bringing Sundays inside. However, at TOCs where Sundays are worked on a voluntary basis, changing to committed Sundays will not save money as these will still be worked as overtime at whatever rate prevails at that company
But would remove barbeque Sundays which what the Government wants to stop.
I’ve yet to see any reforms tabled. No-ones even talking to us. Surely it’s pointless to continue to insist on something happening that appears not to even exist.
Again much of this lays with Network Rail. Like you I’ve heard nothing of reforms working for a TOC.
Sundays inside wouldn’t save money.
As a rail user rather than an employee I'd consider that closing ticket offices would be a seriously retrograde step and would certainly make travel more difficult for a not inconsidersble proportion of the population if my local station is anything to go by.
I think it’s only a matter of time before ticket offices at many stations either a) disappear completely or b) are changed to a multi-disciplinary role. This is one change, that, certainly in the long-run, is only going to go one way due to the change in demographics and technology.
We've had massive house price inflation for donkeys years. Why is now any different ?
How much of that 16 billion went to multinationals profit.
I have my theory that someone from the DfT leaked that info about the Treasury blocking a deal in order to get some leverage.Especially if it's true that a potential deal was all but agreed this week, and could have been offered to members to vote, but someone above stepped in to stop it for fear of it giving hope/bargaining power to the NHS staff.