• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Caledonian Sleeper

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
19,008
What a tease! I would suggest that Birmingham New Street would be a good option for a lot of places, I would certainly use such a stop.
Well, if so, from a purely personal standpoint, I hope it can be delivered without detriment to the timings in London.
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,674
Location
Nowhere Heath
Well, if so, from a purely personal standpoint, I hope it can be delivered without detriment to the timings in London.

If it ran non-stop to Birmingham, dropping the Watford Junction calls, I'd imagine there would be no significant difference in current timings. Certainly Birmingham New Street for an option to join the sleeper is going to open up demand far more than a stop at Crewe would do, if only for the fact that it would be a much more secure and warmer place to wait for a sleeper train than Crewe's open platforms. The demand from the Midlands must be significant, but having to wait until the middle of the night in Crewe is certainly off-putting.

Granted, I'd also want to put in somewhere for the demand in the North West as well, Preston being the most logical option so I'd keep that in there.
 

Turbo004

Member
Joined
3 Feb 2017
Messages
155
That's excellent news. Thank you for the information. I won't complain to my MP then and hopefully book next week.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,361
Location
West of Andover

Credit where it’s due for trying to keep the service going through the blockade, but not the more inauspicious start to 2023 ….
Issue with the 92 not providing full power?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,402
92020 having a bit of a wobble. 66728 on top from Peterborough to York, where it was swapped with 92032. 020 providing ETH throughout.
92032 - which is the Edinburgh standby for the sleeper - having topped 92018 south to get it to York.

GBRf being their usual responsive and resourceful selves, unlike the previous contractor who would have given up last night when the WCML was blocked.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,371
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Sometimes the times are different because of engineering work diversions. The one that is open to book will be the time it actually runs (unless there's - unlikely - another late change or a strike).
 

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
3,766
Hi all,
I try to get my head around the sleeper timetable.
https://www.sleeper.scot/timetable/london-glasgow/ states, that it leaves Euston at 23.50. If I want to book, it only states one leaving 21.34. If I have a look into RTT, only the 23.50 can be found.

What is the solution for this?

Regards
Daniel
Is there a particular date that you want to travel?

The London - Glasgow / Edinburgh sleeper leaves at 23.50 on Mondays to Fridays, and at 23.30 on Sundays, when it is travelling on the WCML via Crewe (the normal route).

When it is going via the East Coast Main Line, because of engineering works on the WCML, then it leaves much earlier (typically around 21.30).
 

brennivin

New Member
Joined
8 Jan 2023
Messages
4
Location
Germany
It is the 16th May 2023.
I didn't find any date where it leaves at 23.50/23.30 so I assume, these are all routed via ECML?
 

Cheshire Scot

Established Member
Joined
24 Jul 2020
Messages
1,348
Location
North East Cheshire
I wonder if perhaps you are looking at a date when it is routed ECML with the consequent earlier departure but the times have not yet been uploaded to industry systems and hence are not on RTT but are known to Caledonian Sleeper - they will typically know months in advance what dates they will be running ECML.
 

brennivin

New Member
Joined
8 Jan 2023
Messages
4
Location
Germany
The issue is that the EST from mainland/BRUX will arrive 21.57, so this means either flying in (if 21.30) or taking a rest in the sleeper (23.50)
 

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
3,766
It is the 16th May 2023.
I didn't find any date where it leaves at 23.50/23.30 so I assume, these are all routed via ECML?
All of this week it leaves at 23.30 / 23.50.

There are many weeks of ECML diversions this year, because of Carstairs remodelling. 16th May will be one of them.

The Caledonian Sleeper timetable is created over a year in advance to maintain a 12 month booking horizon. Although there may be minor changes to the timings, this is correct. You can ignore what's on Real Time Trains as it could be wrong for anything more than about 6 or 7 weeks out, and is in this case because the engineering timetables for 16 weeks ahead are not loaded to Network Rail data.

In summary: sleeper.scot is your correct source of info.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,371
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
The issue is that the EST from mainland/BRUX will arrive 21.57, so this means either flying in (if 21.30) or taking a rest in the sleeper (23.50)

I'd say a 2157 EST arrival and a 2350 Sleeper departure is too tight, anyway, unless your trip is very flexible. I know St Pancras to Euston is only a 15 minute walk (done it lots of times) but when connecting into something where it's going to ruin your trip if it misses (including further back in the journey) you want more slack. I'd be looking to arrive a couple of hours earlier and if it goes well to go for a meal in London, and if that's not viable to do something else e.g. stay over in a hotel and to Scotland by day train the next morning.
 

brennivin

New Member
Joined
8 Jan 2023
Messages
4
Location
Germany
Ok, thanks anyway. The restrictions before are too tight to come earlier (although I would appreciate that). So this time only flying to Glasgow.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,361
Location
West of Andover
Boarded the Highlander tonight from Euston. Has the Inverness portion always been at the northern end at London? (Inverness - Fort William - Aberdeen tonight).

(I could swear in the past its been at the southern end but it's been a few years since I've done the Highland sleeper)
 

Speed43125

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2019
Messages
1,145
Location
Dunblane
A question for those more familiar with the sleeper; I am potentially looking at booking a Euston to Fort Bill return around mid February, 18th to 21st being possible dates, to attend a climbing trip a friend is doing for his birthday. The current seated one way fare is £36.30 (w/ a 16-25 RC) with 4 tickets supposedly still at that price. Does anyone know by how much the next price band rises? And how quickly would one expect those prices to climb?

I presume "Limited Availability" simply means there's plenty of seats left, whereas "Only 4 left at this price" is actually factual?
 
Last edited:

lachlan

Member
Joined
11 Aug 2019
Messages
815
A question for those more familiar with the sleeper; I am potentially looking at booking a Euston to Fort Bill return around mid February, 18th to 21st being possible dates, to attend a climbing trip a friend is doing for his birthday. The current seated one way fare is £36.30 (w/ a 16-25 RC) with 4 tickets supposedly still at that price. Does anyone know by how much the next price band rises? And how quickly would one expect those prices to climb?
I've seen it at around £55 (with Railcard). That was Aberdeen-London. I don't know if there are other price bands, all I've seen from memory is £36, ~£55 and sold out
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
19,008
Boarded the Highlander tonight from Euston. Has the Inverness portion always been at the northern end at London? (Inverness - Fort William - Aberdeen tonight).

(I could swear in the past its been at the southern end but it's been a few years since I've done the Highland sleeper)
Not always at the Northern end. It was changed when the stock was switched from Mark 3s to Mark 5s. As you say, the Inverness portion used to the South end going north.

The switch was made because the Edinburgh portion always works the Inverness portion.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,361
Location
West of Andover
Not always at the Northern end. It was changed when the stock was switched from Mark 3s to Mark 5s. As you say, the Inverness portion used to the South end going north.

The switch was made because the Edinburgh portion always works the Inverness portion.
Must make it harder at Edinburgh considering the Inverness part is meant to be the first out
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
19,008
Must make it harder at Edinburgh considering the Inverness part is meant to be the first out
Not really. The train is split, the 92 draws the train further down the platform and the Inverness locomotives back onto the train via the scissors crossover. Once the Inverness portion has gone, the Fort William shunting can happen.
 

Speed43125

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2019
Messages
1,145
Location
Dunblane
Must make it harder at Edinburgh considering the Inverness part is meant to be the first out
The train reverses in Edinburgh, so out of Euston it used to be 90/92 - FW - ABD - INV, the 67 would then draw the inverness portion off the rear and then be off once the tail lamp had been attached.
 

Napier

Member
Joined
13 Jan 2023
Messages
76
Location
UK
It might be that the train was lightly loaded so by putting all the guests together in one coach they free up the other berths for seated passengers given upgrades if the seated coach was out of action?
Reminds me of this

 

Top