• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

How *should* HS2 have been built?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
17,808
Based on flights, but one would also have to look at how many people from Birmingham travel to other airports and fly from there or get Eurostar from London.
The maximum amount of flights to Paris is 5 a day on a Monday and Friday. Tuesday has three, Wednesday and Thursday have 4. Its likely to be one trains worth of people a day.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,308
Based on flights, but one would also have to look at how many people from Birmingham travel to other airports and fly from there or get Eurostar from London.

ln September, a little less than 24000 people flew between Birmingham and Paris (total of both ways). Thats 400 a day each way. Less than half a eurostar.
 
Last edited:

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
2,076
Location
York
ln September, a lottle less than 24000 people flew between Birmingham and Paris (total of both ways). Thats 400 a day each way. Less than half a eurostar.
That's direct, think about how many may fly from other airports, or get Eurostar from London. A direct service could stimulate a lot of demand.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,767
Location
Croydon
That's direct, think about how many may fly from other airports, or get Eurostar from London. A direct service could stimulate a lot of demand.
I don't see how a train can compete with a few plane loads from different airports. It would have to go on a roundabout route to serve say York, Leeds, Manchester, Liverpool and then Birmingham with all the attendant facilities at each.

Those getting Eurostar from London already are doing it and so are not flying. I can imagine they would be benefiting from frequent domestic train services from their various cities around the UK so might not find a single through service to be at a convenient time.

It is a bit like the UK sleeper situation. The day trains are now so fast and frequent that they have dissolved the demand for sleepers. Gone are some of the London to Scotland sleepers, gone are the Scotland to SW sleepers. A fast and frequent high speed rail network to London will cover most bases and then we should worry about a frequent shuttle between Euston and StPancras.

For Euston to StPancras a shuttle would not be a train but autonomous vehicles or mini-busses, or a travelater (as seen linking Heathrow terminals 2 and 3) if you are ambitious enough. Not saying that is easy or possible but probably more use and easier to construct than a heavy rail link.
 

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
2,076
Location
York
I don't see how a train can compete with a few plane loads from different airports. It would have to go on a roundabout route to serve say York, Leeds, Manchester, Liverpool and then Birmingham with all the attendant facilities at each.

Those getting Eurostar from London already are doing it and so are not flying. I can imagine they would be benefiting from frequent domestic train services from their various cities around the UK so might not find a single through service to be at a convenient time.

It is a bit like the UK sleeper situation. The day trains are now so fast and frequent that they have dissolved the demand for sleepers. Gone are some of the London to Scotland sleepers, gone are the Scotland to SW sleepers. A fast and frequent high speed rail network to London will cover most bases and then we should worry about a frequent shuttle between Euston and StPancras.

For Euston to StPancras a shuttle would not be a train but autonomous vehicles or mini-busses, or a travelater (as seen linking Heathrow terminals 2 and 3) if you are ambitious enough. Not saying that is easy or possible but probably more use and easier to construct than a heavy rail link.
An Edinburgh-Newcastle-York-Leeds-Doncaster-HS1-Channel Tunnel-Paris could be very successful.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,767
Location
Croydon
An Edinburgh-Newcastle-York-Leeds-Doncaster-HS1-Channel Tunnel-Paris could be very successful.
The question is how many trains could be filled ?. Would that justify the connection and all the considerable customs and security check spaces required for the passengers at each station ?.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
18,748
An Edinburgh-Newcastle-York-Leeds-Doncaster-HS1-Channel Tunnel-Paris could be very successful.
Such a service would require dozens of comparatively highly paid staff roles.
I can't see it being economically attractive compared to a urban gondola or similar connection between Euston and St Pancras
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,767
Location
Croydon
Such a service would require dozens of comparatively highly paid staff roles.
I can't see it being economically attractive compared to a urban gondola or similar connection between Euston and St Pancras
My bold - I like that description.

Incidentally anyone experienced the "Pods" at Heathrow terminal five ?.

Linky.
 

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
2,076
Location
York
Incidentally anyone experienced the "Pods" at Heathrow terminal five ?.
Never, I always arrive by public transport.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Such a service would require dozens of comparatively highly paid staff roles.
I can't see it being economically attractive compared to a urban gondola or similar connection between Euston and St Pancras
With significant subsidies, it could work.
 

SynthD

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2020
Messages
1,601
Location
UK
With significant subsidies, it could work.
What’s the political reason to subsidise this, rather than the far smaller plans above to build a gondola along the length of Phoenix Rd to join up HS1/2?
 

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
2,076
Location
York
What’s the political reason to subsidise this, rather than the far smaller plans above to build a gondola along the length of Phoenix Rd to join up HS1/2?
With more and more countries banning short haul flights, there is a political reason to subsidise it.
 

SynthD

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2020
Messages
1,601
Location
UK
With more and more countries banning short haul flights, there is a political reason to subsidise it.
Which of those countries subsidise the rail journey? France builds a substantial high speed network and people want to use it. I don’t know SNCF financials. We would better achieve your aims by building HS2 to the full extent, without the headline one train per day that goes all the way through.
 

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
2,076
Location
York
Which of those countries subsidise the rail journey? France builds a substantial high speed network and people want to use it. I don’t know SNCF financials. We would better achieve your aims by building HS2 to the full extent, without the headline one train per day that goes all the way through.
I think that both HS2 in full and cross-channel services from other cities should happen. France hasn't subsidised trains, but for countries to make replacing short haul flights with trains affordable for passengers, subsidies must be involved.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,892
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
With more and more countries banning short haul flights, there is a political reason to subsidise it.

You'd gain more if you were going to put subsidy in from subsidising the fares down a bit.

As for a gondola, what a waste of money. They just need an eastern entrance to Euston Square LU then the change would be easy.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
18,748
With significant subsidies, it could work.
But there is little reason to subsidise a through train when it would cost orders of magnitude more than improving the links between Euston and King's Cross - which won't require half empty international trains to consume precious paths on UK railway infrastructure.
 

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
2,640
Location
Way on down South London town
The flaw with HS2 and its lack of Birmingham through station, is that a NoL Eurostar can't run from Manchester and pick up at Birmingham. I'm sure it'll fill up two-thirds of a TGV Reseau unit if it did so.

But as such a service would probably also need to call at Ebbsfleet or Ashford or both, as others have said it'll be quicker to just change in London - sadly.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
17,808
The flaw with HS2 and its lack of Birmingham through station, is that a NoL Eurostar can't run from Manchester and pick up at Birmingham. I'm sure it'll fill up two-thirds of a TGV Reseau unit if it did so.

But as such a service would probably also need to call at Ebbsfleet or Ashford or both, as others have said it'll be quicker to just change in London - sadly.
Why not? just has the journey time penalty of going to Curzon St.
 

SynthD

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2020
Messages
1,601
Location
UK
France hasn't subsidised trains, but for countries to make replacing short haul flights with trains affordable for passengers, subsidies must be involved.
But France are replacing short haul flights with trains, by force rather than appeal. In this country we're trying neither and proclaiming to be all out of ideas.
 

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
2,076
Location
York
You'd gain more if you were going to put subsidy in from subsidising the fares down a bit.
Of course, that's where the subsidies would go towards.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

But there is little reason to subsidise a through train when it would cost orders of magnitude more than improving the links between Euston and King's Cross - which won't require half empty international trains to consume precious paths on UK railway infrastructure.
One could argue that there is no reason to subsidise rail routes in rural areas if bus services are launched. The rail industry has to take the first step, making these changes today will ensure a better service for the public tomorrow. Additionally, this train could come from Manchester, meaning that it wouldn't be half full.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,308
An Edinburgh-Newcastle-York-Leeds-Doncaster-HS1-Channel Tunnel-Paris could be very successful.

Define “successful”.



With more and more countries banning short haul flights, there is a political reason to subsidise it.

Which countries have or are banning short haul flights?


The flaw with HS2 and its lack of Birmingham through station, is that a NoL Eurostar can't run from Manchester and pick up at Birmingham. I'm sure it'll fill up two-thirds of a TGV Reseau unit if it did so.

There is a through station, and it’s right by the airport!
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
15,364
Location
Bristol
France, plus Austria and Spain are looking into it.
The French 'ban' affects a handful of people, as connecting tickets are exempt.
Enough demand to fill at least 3-4 daily trains.
Really? You think 3,000-3,500 people daily From Edinburgh, Newcastle and Leeds will want to match the 3/4 daily trains departure times instead of flying largely at their convenience. And return. It's 1tp2h from St Pancras, and King's Cross is just over the road.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top