Yes that's right - 1x230 and 2x197 - at present the 230 doing the morning duty swaps with a classmate around lunchtime. The interval between trains is nearer 45 mins, sometimes more. If you are thinking of travelling check the timetable as it is not a "clockface" service. But then neither is the Chester / Wrexham / Shrewsbury line.I thought the bidstons went up to 1x230 and 2x197 diagrams to provide one train every 40ish minutes ?
Nearly as barmy as having a pool of 11 Class 67s for TfW services and being lucky if you get three working... (it's one of 11 currently!)A fleet of five 230s so that one can be used per day, and even that has to be swapped halfway. It’s so barmy.
Completely agree that’s also farsical. Affects a much more important route too so even worse. TfW will need to address both of these fleets long term soon enough.Nearly as barmy as having a pool of 11 Class 67s for TfW services and being lucky if you get three working... (it's one of 11 currently!)
I'm aware that one is a Christmas tree, but what happened to the fifth?I think it was this morning that TFW tried to get the 3 diagrams covered as 1x 197 and 2x 230’s. Birkenhead said no as it left only 1 spare.
I’m not actually sure to be honest. Perhaps it was assigned as the one to be swapped over half way through (but I assume they would need 2 extra units to swap if they were running 2 x 230 diagrams in the current state).I'm aware that one is a Christmas tree, but what happened to the fifth?
As it stands TFW don’t have enough units accepted into service to be providing the desired level of service so even getting 1 x 230 out frees up an extra valuable unit.Perhaps finally time to admit that the experiment with 230's doesn't work and stick 3 197's on the route? Or do TFW not have enough units to do that?
The 197s are now planned to run Marches alongside the mks, West Wales services, North Wales services, and Liverpool serviced do I'd assume they'd need a few extra.As it stands TFW don’t have enough units accepted into service to be providing the desired level of service so even getting 1 x 230 out frees up an extra valuable unit.
In the longer term, I’m not so sure sorry, but I would guess that the fleet plan includes the 5x230’s so guess they’d need something to replace them.
The problem is they have spent over £30 million on these units and if they throw in the towel some people will have some serious questions to answer. Expect good money to be thrown after bad for the foreseeable.Perhaps finally time to admit that the experiment with 230's doesn't work and stick 3 197's on the route? Or do TFW not have enough units to do that?
Not sure what excuses you’re referring to in particular?It’s pathetic the constant excuses for them. To my knowledge 007/008/009 are the only ones that are working and the training runs seem to have stopped as well so they should have three available. 006 we know might not ever run and 010 seems to be broken again long term, possible using parts for the others? And saying they need to keep a spare on the depot is a poor excuse, don’t think that happens at Chester etc everything that’s available goes out.
It’s all very well having the 197s covering the service but they are too much for the route and this is also causing problems on the main line and in other areas with services such as Blaenau and Liverpool Lime St getting cancelled and trains running 2 cars full instead of 4. The knock on effect of the 230 debacle just goes on and on and TFW need to sort out a long term solution for them. Maybe get the 153s back now if the timings are not as tight.
Presume Stadler signed a contract to support them with spares and training by Vivarail (before they went bust?) So will have to honour the contract and fix 230s.I also heard separately that Birkenhead aren’t overly happy about being lumbered with the 230’s (unsurprisingly).
I would assume the SWR 484s are a lot simpler ?.Presume Stadler signed a contract to support them with spares and training by Vivarail (before they went bust?) So will have to honour the contract and fix 230s.
GWR brought some Vivarail IP and spares and took on some staff, so could help Stadler and SWR (484s)?.
Not sure what excuses you’re referring to in particular?
A long term plan really does need to come about at this point (maybe it has internally, but it would be nice to know). Even if that plan is to try and fix the 230’s.
So that leaves one working 230 then if I'm not mistaken?The excuses about the drivers and pollen and whatever else they came out with. Anyway they have lived up to their reputation again today as both 230s have failed.
If it's true there's only one working unit it won't be allowed out - there needs to be a spare working to rescue it if it fails.So that leaves one working 230 then if I'm not mistaken?
008 yesterday. 009 today.If it's true there's only one working unit it won't be allowed out - there needs to be a spare working to rescue it if it fails.
Going there For tyre turning, believe it's 2 sets.Strange path on Real Time Trains, 13:24 Birkenhead North to Crewe TMD (E) today showing as a class 230?
Fast forward to today (Monday) and every train has run. 230007 230010 197018 and 197042So that leaves one working 230 then if I'm not mistaken?
008 and 009, passed Crewe webcams, as you say gone for tyre turning.6 car 230 sitting on the through road between platform 3 and 4 at Chester just now.
I assume the 2 sets going for tyre turning.
6 car 230 sitting on the through road between platform 3 and 4 at Chester just now.
I assume the 2 sets going for tyre turning.