• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

TPE Transpennine claiming car users transferring as car costs rising

Status
Not open for further replies.

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
8,266
Location
West Wiltshire
TPE has issued press release about research showing to to motoring cost increases, drivers switching to train. Not clear though what the reasoning for choosing to announce this is. If this is just info, or PR team saying how good they are, or an indirect grovel to Governments to increase capacity to absorb the extra motorists


Car insurance quotes have risen by £348 on average this year alone and now more than half of UK drivers (56%) say they cannot afford to continue running their car with the increase in costs.
New research from TransPennine Express (TPE) found that half (49%) of drivers are seriously worried about the increase in petrol, car insurance and car tax.
In fact, more than a third (38%) say that if these costs continue to rise they will be forced to stop driving.
Shockingly, five per cent of UK drivers – two million car owners – have already stopped driving this year because they simply cannot afford to get behind the wheel.
The new research was revealed by the rail operator as more than half (52%) of Brits say that their confidence in the railway is improving, a form of travel that Brits could switch to permanently if car costs increase further.
Kathryn O'Brien, Customer Experience and Transformation Director at TPE, said: “We could be on the precipice of a huge transformation in the way we travel according to our latest research. Car running costs are increasing year on year, faster than the rate of inflation and they’re that high that it’s forcing them off the road.”
With TPE offering regular journeys to fantastic northern destinations, such as Manchester to Liverpool, for as little as £3.80*, it’s not hard to see why drivers might make the switch.
Worryingly 17-24 year-olds are being impacted most, with the average car insurance quote rising by an astonishing £688.
Further research from TPE reveals that more than a quarter (28%) will now switch from driving to travel by train, and this percentage is set to increase as 13% of drivers say that if costs don’t come down they will stop driving forever.
Kathryn added: “Our affordable prices mean that if Brits want to make the switch and start travelling by train, they can sit back, relax and make the most of our modern, clean and comfortable trains without watching the pennies as they get behind the wheel.”
The Rail Delivery Group (RDG) compared per passenger emission data from rail business routes in Britain with the equivalent per-passenger emission data for the same trip by car.
According to its research across 100 routes, it has been measured that the train is almost nine times greener than using a petrol or diesel car, more than four times greener than using a plug-in hybrid electric car and almost two-and-a-half times greener than using a battery electric car.



Not clear to me if this is a trend, how they intend to provide extra capacity to absorb it.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,435
TPE has issued press release about research showing to to motoring cost increases, drivers switching to train. Not clear though what the reasoning for choosing to announce this is. If this is just info, or PR team saying how good they are, or an indirect grovel to Governments to increase capacity to absorb the extra motorists






Not clear to me if this is a trend, how they intend to provide extra capacity to absorb it.
TPE are increasing there services from the December timetable.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,801
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
TPE has issued press release about research showing to to motoring cost increases, drivers switching to train. Not clear though what the reasoning for choosing to announce this is. If this is just info, or PR team saying how good they are, or an indirect grovel to Governments to increase capacity to absorb the extra motorists






Not clear to me if this is a trend, how they intend to provide extra capacity to absorb it.

Must say I’m not seeing much evidence of any such trend round here (London area). Roads are as busy as ever if not more so.
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,504
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
Must say I’m not seeing much evidence of any such trend round here (London area). Roads are as busy as ever if not more so.
Likewise, here in Medway. To be honest, this this kind of media release smacks of a degree of desperation by an operator that knows that many of its users both current and past are dissatisfied with it and drumming up. New custom has become all that more complicated. As said, current and past users have told people to basically find any other possible solution as long as it doesn't involve interacting with them.
 

PeterC

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Messages
4,417
I have made one trip this year where it was financially advantageous to use the train. Even so that meant using the bus at one end which gave an appreciable time overhead and only worked on cost thanks to ENCTS.
 

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
3,053
The idea that 56% of car drivers are going to suddenly abandon their cars is just ridiculous.
 

BlueLeanie

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2023
Messages
522
Location
Haddenham
Sounds like they'll need to increase the car park charges to mitigate against demand.

Would be nice if the Government promised a 5 year Freeze, backdated to July, for all rail, hospital, and local government controlled parking.
 

Rail Quest

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2023
Messages
529
Location
Warrington
Wait where's the "56% say they cannot afford to continue running their car with the increase in costs" coming from? They open with that headline and then go on to say "more than a third (38%) say that if these costs continue to rise they will be forced to stop driving". Have I misunderstood the statistics here or have they contradicted themselves in their own article?
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,973
The railway should attract passengers by the experience being good, not the alternative being unaffordable.
 

nr758123

Member
Joined
3 Jun 2014
Messages
551
Location
West Yorkshire
To be honest, this this kind of media release smacks of a degree of desperation by an operator that knows that many of its users both current and past are dissatisfied with it and drumming up. New custom has become all that more complicated. As said, current and past users have told people to basically find any other possible solution as long as it doesn't involve interacting with them.
There was definitely some modal shift away from TPE in the years when their services were beyond awful. "Any other possible solution as long as it doesn't involve interacting with them" is a fair summary of commuters' attitudes towards TPE through 2022 & 2023. After a few months of providing a mostly reliable service, it's possible that some of those lost customers might now be prepared to come back to the railways.
 

childwallblues

Established Member
Joined
3 Jul 2014
Messages
3,516
Location
Liverpool, UK
TPE are increaing services between Liverpool and Manchester from December to three trains an hour with the return of the hourly service to Hull.
 

twpsaesneg

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2009
Messages
480
The railway should attract passengers by the experience being good, not the alternative being unaffordable.
I'm not sure it will ever do that though. I can put loads of luggage in my car, without worrying about it being stolen during the journey, I am guaranteed a (comfortable) seat, I get to choose what music I listen to and can set the temperature to my liking.

If the train was cheaper or faster or, preferably, both for the journey I want to do then realistically that's what would get me onto it.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,238
Location
Bolton
TPE are increaing services between Liverpool and Manchester from December to three trains an hour with the return of the hourly service to Hull.
The service is similar to what it was in 2014, just with the 802 instead of a single 185. It's certainly not dramatically improved.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,259
Location
Fenny Stratford
Must say I’m not seeing much evidence of any such trend round here (London area). Roads are as busy as ever if not more so.
I am not sure transpennine will take many cars off the roads in London ;)

TPE has issued press release about research showing to to motoring cost increases, drivers switching to train. Not clear though what the reasoning for choosing to announce this is. If this is just info, or PR team saying how good they are, or an indirect grovel to Governments to increase capacity to absorb the extra motorists
TPE is an attractive service - good timetable, decent trains and as reliable as anyone else. Leeds > Manchester timings must compare favourably with a M62 journey. I know the cognoscenti wont like that view,,,,,,,,,,

OF COURSE ( and one must state the obvious here) the service could be better, the trains longer and more electrified, the infrastructure more reliable etc etc e tc
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
18,628
Location
Yorkshire
Just as a counter to this, I resumed driving last year in anticipation of the disruption due to the Trans-Pennine Route Upgrade work. I still use the train for certain trips, such as visiting Leeds or Manchester city centres, but weekend journeys will usually involve bustitutions so I'd rather drive.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,749
Location
Yorks
The services via Wakefield Kirkgate certainly seem popular whenever I use them, so this is one area where they are providing a better service.

In terms of the overall argument, I was under the impression that motoring costs were quite low by historical standards.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Sounds like they'll need to increase the car park charges to mitigate against demand.

Would be nice if the Government promised a 5 year Freeze, backdated to July, for all rail, hospital, and local government controlled parking.

I'd rather the freeze was on fares.
 

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
1,993
Location
All around the network
The services via Wakefield Kirkgate certainly seem popular whenever I use them, so this is one area where they are providing a better service.

In terms of the overall argument, I was under the impression that motoring costs were quite low by historical standards.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Insurance has doubled and tripled for some cars. Petrol prices have fallen from their high two years ago, but car prices are still high and road tax is moving to a pay per mile basis. Servicing and parts have become more expensive, but at least we don't need winter tyres like Germany, northern and eastern Europe does.
I'd rather the freeze was on fares.
It would mean an annual fare subsidy budget be given to the railways to make up the difference, which I can't see any government doing. All policy has been in recent years is robbing Peter to pay Paul for taxes and tax relief and subsides.
 

Swanley 59

Member
Joined
6 Apr 2021
Messages
115
Location
Northumberland
My wife uses TPE between Newcastle - Manchester two or three times a month. She notes that the trains have become busier and the service more reliable in the last year. However, before TPE get carried away into thinking they are running a good service, she is coming from a place where the service was so bad that she was on the verge of quitting her job to avoid TPE and their wretched trains.
 

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
5,062
Location
County Durham
I’m finding it to be the other way round. It’s cheaper to drive for many journeys now than it is to take the train.
I can drive from Durham to Lancaster in around 2 hours for about £10 each way. The train comes nowhere close to matching that for either time or cost.

Another journey I’ve recently driven that was cheaper than the train was Durham to Dorset. Used about £80 of petrol for a return trip. The train would have cost more than £100 on the dates I needed to travel and involved transiting London with luggage.

So from my point of view, no, the train isn’t financially more viable than driving.

Sounds like the beginning of an excuse to keep the mk5 sets
They’re already gone. They’re not coming back.
 

Swanley 59

Member
Joined
6 Apr 2021
Messages
115
Location
Northumberland
While the cost of fuel may have fallen recently in relative terms, other costs have increased dramatically. If I were to take the car to work, I'd be faced with £4.40 in Tyne Tunnel fees and £6 in parking fees on top of fuel and the costs of running a car. The Anytime Return fare is £12.20. I'm fortunate that I can walk at either end.

Getting rid of the second car has saved us a fortune.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,259
Location
Fenny Stratford
I can drive from Durham to Lancaster in around 2 hours for about £10 each way. The train comes nowhere close to matching that for either time or cost.
but that isn't a direct train. Can you drive to Manchester for that? That is a comparable road v tpe journey
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,824
but that isn't a direct train. Can you drive to Manchester for that? That is a comparable road v tpe journey
These comparisons are still important though as it gives real world examples of journeys. There are many journeys that I make that are faster by train than by car, but if origin or destination is my home then it’s rare this still holds true. Suggesting you should only compare the timings when there’s a direct train seems to be rather biasing the results. Real world journeys are real world journeys.

On the flip side though there’s no point suggesting it takes ages to get by train between Thorne north and Thorne south and blaming the railway for it.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,749
Location
Yorks
Insurance has doubled and tripled for some cars. Petrol prices have fallen from their high two years ago, but car prices are still high and road tax is moving to a pay per mile basis. Servicing and parts have become more expensive, but at least we don't need winter tyres like Germany, northern and eastern Europe does.

It would mean an annual fare subsidy budget be given to the railways to make up the difference, which I can't see any government doing. All policy has been in recent years is robbing Peter to pay Paul for taxes and tax relief and subsides.

Thanks for the info on motoring costs.

I'm not saying that a fares freeze is on anyone's agenda - just questioning why we would reduce costs for one group of rail passengers (those who drive to the station) rather than all passengers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top