• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

TfW class 398 Stadler Citylink tram trains

MattRat

On Moderation
Joined
26 May 2021
Messages
2,087
Location
Liverpool
Haven't we done the toilet question ad nauseum in the past.
When talking about other stock, yes.

Although, it's slightly different compared to those because we have none toilet vehicles replacing toilet fitted vehicles, rather than like for like. So in that regard, it can be seen as a downgrade. Doesn't mean the 398s actually need toilets though, just talking about how the public could perceive it
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
4,635
When talking about other stock, yes.

Although, it's slightly different compared to those because we have none toilet vehicles replacing toilet fitted vehicles, rather than like for like. So in that regard, it can be seen as a downgrade. Doesn't mean the 398s actually need toilets though, just talking about how the public could perceive it

We can see how considerate TfW is by the fact that some years ago they started randomly running trains without toilets on the City and Coryton Line without any warning. Just signs telling passengers that the toilet is "out of order" and they should move to a non-existent other carriage to avail themselves of the facilities.
 

EveningStarr

Member
Joined
24 Oct 2024
Messages
24
Location
South Wales
I'm told (although I haven't found anything official on this) that non-toileted trains are currently only allowed on journeys with up to 30 minutes in the schedule to a toileted station, which is why single 153/9s occasionally appear on the Coryton/Penarth/Caerphilly route, and the Coryton/City Line and Cardiff Bay shuttles pre-June 2024.
(CPH>CDQ 17mins,
COY>CDQ 17mins,
PEN>CDF 11mins).
It's not uncommon, however, that in disruption passengers and crew are stranded on the unit at an un-toileted station or in between stations.

But yes, the 398s will take a lot of convincing for me to think they were a good idea for the Taff services. They'd be absolutely perfect on Coryton services - short distance, start-stop, plenty of capacity for the passenger levels etc, and their acceleration would help with resilience in the schedule and increase to 4tph when the Rhiwbina/Birchgrove loop goes in. If the Penarth line were to be electrified, I daresay those COY/PEN/CPH diagrams would be doable with 3-car 398s.
 

DBS92042

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2019
Messages
1,515
Believe there was also a delivery last week, understand both went to Asfordby rather than Taff's Well.
Confirmed sightings of 024 and 025 at Old Dalby now. So one of those two was delivered around 03/02 and then the other a week after. Which order, however, I don't know so hopefully someone can confirm which arrived first?
 

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
4,673
When talking about other stock, yes.

Although, it's slightly different compared to those because we have none toilet vehicles replacing toilet fitted vehicles, rather than like for like. So in that regard, it can be seen as a downgrade. Doesn't mean the 398s actually need toilets though, just talking about how the public could perceive it
I think you’ll find that the subject has been done to death in relation to this stock at frequent intervals since the announcement was made several years ago.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,760
Location
Croydon
I'm told (although I haven't found anything official on this) that non-toileted trains are currently only allowed on journeys with up to 30 minutes in the schedule to a toileted station, which is why single 153/9s occasionally appear on the Coryton/Penarth/Caerphilly route, and the Coryton/City Line and Cardiff Bay shuttles pre-June 2024.
(CPH>CDQ 17mins,
COY>CDQ 17mins,
PEN>CDF 11mins).
It's not uncommon, however, that in disruption passengers and crew are stranded on the unit at an un-toileted station or in between stations.

But yes, the 398s will take a lot of convincing for me to think they were a good idea for the Taff services. They'd be absolutely perfect on Coryton services - short distance, start-stop, plenty of capacity for the passenger levels etc, and their acceleration would help with resilience in the schedule and increase to 4tph when the Rhiwbina/Birchgrove loop goes in. If the Penarth line were to be electrified, I daresay those COY/PEN/CPH diagrams would be doable with 3-car 398s.
For me I think common sense says the journeys are long enough for a toilet to be expected on board. If road coaches can have a toilet why is it that trains cannot accommodate one ?.

I can accept that the tram-train idea came about to enable on-road running BUT can anyone see this happening anytime soon ?.
Are the valley line customers (Treherbert, Aberdare and Merthyr) going to have to endure tram-trains for decades with no onward travel onto the streets of Cardiff ?.
That is the risk.
 

Bob Price

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2019
Messages
1,164
From Taffs Well bridge this afternoon.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

For me I think common sense says the journeys are long enough for a toilet to be expected on board. If road coaches can have a toilet why is it that trains cannot accommodate one ?.

I can accept that the tram-train idea came about to enable on-road running BUT can anyone see this happening anytime soon ?.
Are the valley line customers (Treherbert, Aberdare and Merthyr) going to have to endure tram-trains for decades with no onward travel onto the streets of Cardiff ?.
That is the risk.
However the journey times will be reduced, the amount of capacity increased, the number of services increased, and earlier and later services introduced. No one will be sitting on board thinking "I wonder when these will run on streets?".

In case you missed it the first part of Cross rail in Cardiff is funded and will be built so street running won't be decades.

Take a close look at the history of Metro link and you will understand what could be achieved starting with converting train to tram.
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20250302_143319319.jpg
    PXL_20250302_143319319.jpg
    2.4 MB · Views: 167
Last edited:

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
11,699
Location
Salford Quays, Manchester
We can see how considerate TfW is by the fact that some years ago they started randomly running trains without toilets on the City and Coryton Line without any warning. Just signs telling passengers that the toilet is "out of order" and they should move to a non-existent other carriage to avail themselves of the facilities.
They really shot themselves in the foot by labelling the door "Toilet out of order," rather than "Private," or something "Cupboard for staff use only," because these toilets will never be back in order will they? All this means is customers are constantly getting on trains and thinking that TfW have constantly broken toilets on an alarming number of trains that they STILL haven't bothered to fix!
 

sd0733

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2012
Messages
4,658
They really shot themselves in the foot by labelling the door "Toilet out of order," rather than "Private," or something "Cupboard for staff use only," because these toilets will never be back in order will they? All this means is customers are constantly getting on trains and thinking that TfW have constantly broken toilets on an alarming number of trains that they STILL haven't bothered to fix!
It was a bizarre thing to put on them, many staff have pointed that out since the day that they appeared, like you say it looks like they've just been left broken for the last 3 or 4 years.
A couple of them will be brought back into use when they're converted into /5s but the vast majority won't, the /9s seem to see little use now and most of them are languishing at Landore.
 

Cardiff123

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2013
Messages
1,433
The 153/9s were brought in by TfW for extra capacity, usually to work doubled up with a fully PRM compliant 153/3, and we're never staying on long-term. Hence why the 153/9s only ever had a PRM "light" conversion without the expense of being fitted out with a full PRM compliant Universal Access Toilet.
The 153/9 toilets that are permanently locked out of use also don't have retention tanks, so can't be used even when coupled up with a 153/3.
 

sd0733

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2012
Messages
4,658
Interesting, I didn’t know this. May I ask which have been stood down at Landore please?
All bar 3 now, only 1 seems to be in traffic. I'll post properly on the 15x thread to try and avoid going too far off topic on this one!
 

Archie810

Member
Joined
25 Jan 2023
Messages
46
Location
Derbyshire
I'm confused about what these are and what they are for, they are going to run exclusively on railways for the time being, but they call them tram-trains, but are they actually just light trains?
 

StripeyNick

Member
Joined
25 Apr 2012
Messages
325
Location
Cowbridge, S.Wales
I'm confused about what these are and what they are for, they are going to run exclusively on railways for the time being, but they call them tram-trains, but are they actually just light trains?
Tram trains are built to a slightly different spec to a tram to allow them to run on normal, heavy rail. For the time being they will run on the Valley services but ultimately they will be able to run on any street sections when they are eventually built (Callaghan Square, extension onwards from the Bay for example)
 

Bob Price

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2019
Messages
1,164
They have them in Sheffield. They run through the streets from the centre of Sheffield then just south of Meadowhall join Network Rail lines and run to Rotherham. They seem to have been successful up there and other systems, especially Manchester, are looking at using the concept. It's quite common in some other European countries.
 

MikePJ

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2015
Messages
722
I'm confused about what these are and what they are for, they are going to run exclusively on railways for the time being, but they call them tram-trains, but are they actually just light trains?
They will mostly run as trains. However, the line between Cardiff Bay and Queen Street is being converted to tramway-style: that means that it will be unfenced and there will be several new places where pedestrians and cyclists can cross the line. It’ll also have tramway signalling, so the signalling won’t try and keep vehicles apart, the drivers will be expected to travel at a speed where they can stop within the distance they can see (like a car or bus). The 398s have magnetic track brakes to help them stop suddenly if they need to. Unlike the Sheffield tram-trains, they will only have 25kV overhead equipment, but they do have batteries onboard. Any eventual street running will be on battery. Whereas the Sheffield system is a street tramway that runs briefly on the mainline system, the Cardiff system will effectively be a train that runs briefly like a tram in some parts of the city.

The first street running won’t happen until Cardiff Crossrail phase 1 opens (that’s in design stage now) and will involve 398s running on the street through Callaghan Square to provide a link between Cardiff Central and Cardiff Bay.
 

Bob Price

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2019
Messages
1,164
Apparently the 398's will be carrying out test running between Cardiff and Seven Tunnel Junction at some point. Don't know details at this time. If true this is very welcome news and another step to getting these units into service.
 

generalnerd

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2025
Messages
326
Location
Hull
They are "low floor" for a train (like the FLIRTS), which is "high floor" for a tram, i.e. doors at normal railway platform height.

Aside from the logstics of lowering all the platforms they will use, it would require having separate 398 and FLIRT platforms or sections of platforms at Queen Street (which is suppose is possible in principle...)

For the time being they will use their abilities to operate as trams only over a very small section of their routes.
Ah, so they are more like a train-tram than a tram-train
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,158
Apparently the 398's will be carrying out test running between Cardiff and Seven Tunnel Junction at some point. Don't know details at this time. If true this is very welcome news and another step to getting these units into service.

Mileage accumulation?
 

generalnerd

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2025
Messages
326
Location
Hull
That would make sense as I believe there will be very little "on street" running and most of their routes will be on heavy rail networks
Ah, ok. Thank you. Surely they could have made some form of segregated metro system (elevated or underground) as that, while more expensive, would be more beneficial for the future
 

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
4,673
Ah, ok. Thank you. Surely they could have made some form of segregated metro system (elevated or underground) as that, while more expensive, would be more beneficial for the future
The Metro is already costing a fortune. When things become more expensive, they often end up not happening at all. Personally I think the plans for improvements to rail/tram routes in Cardiff are probably already stretching the limits as to what are affordable.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,760
Location
Croydon
Ah, ok. Thank you. Surely they could have made some form of segregated metro system (elevated or underground) as that, while more expensive, would be more beneficial for the future
I was wondering. What is the range likely to be on battery ?.
Remembering (assuming) that there will be no 25kV AC knitting on any street running sections.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The Metro is already costing a fortune. When things become more expensive, they often end up not happening at all. Personally I think the plans for improvements to rail/tram routes in Cardiff are probably already stretching the limits as to what are affordable.
They have spent a lot (not unreasonably) on the significant non-street parts. If the budget runs out before any street running part is completed it will not be a disaster as the Valleys are getting a lot of advantages anyway. Street running would be the cherry on the top only a wee bit frustrating if the tram-trains never got onto the streets soon.
 

Bob Price

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2019
Messages
1,164
Mileage accumulation?
I would guess so. They are paths this week for trips in the wee small hours on the core valleys, but I am guessing if this wasn't someone winding me up, they will be gaining as much milage as they can on a core batch to get them ready for introduction later this year.
 

MikePJ

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2015
Messages
722
I was wondering. What is the range likely to be on battery ?.
Remembering (assuming) that there will be no 25kV AC knitting on any street running sections.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
10km (6 miles) on battery, according to this article: https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/c...ram-train-unveiled-at-innotrans/62443.article

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It’s worth adding that none of the tramway or street running currently planned involves trams running in “mixed traffic” i.e. sharing with cars and lorries. The Callaghan Square section is currently planned to be a segregated section with two crossings where tram-trains will cross the main traffic lanes at traffic lights.
 
Last edited:

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
4,673
The article states:-

Stadler told Rail Business UK the battery offers a range of about 10 km, but the intention is that it would be used for shorter distances of around 2 km between sections of overhead.

I'm sure a few of the unelectrified sections are quite a bit more than 2km, but stand to be corrected.
 

Caaardiff

Member
Joined
9 Jun 2019
Messages
1,097
The mix of 756 and 398 is already there across the opposite Valleys. It would've made far better sense to have more Flirts covering the longer journeys up the TAM Valley and have the 398s for more localised trips, e.g Pontypridd down, and City Line.

The Franchise bid was made too complicated and ambitious, and everyone who liked it did so with rose tinted glasses.
 

Top