• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Hull Trains Strike over dismissal

Status
Not open for further replies.

muz379

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2014
Messages
2,419
But surely this is riddiculous. Why dont they just go for unfair dismissal and take Hull Trains to court if they dont agree with the decision?
Tribunals can take time , and the outcome is still subject of uncertainty . And of course even if the trubunal rules in favour of the staff member it doesn't always order reinstatement , even if it does the employer can just ignore said order and pay more damages .
Actually it can be, because the decision to call a ballot, or not, in the first place, is down to self-same officials, aware that ballots for whatever are very rarely rejected.
Not quite , it is the unions elected executive committee that decides when to call a ballot. Officials work to the instructions of the executive committee and general secretary .
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
9,501
Location
London
I mean that is simply not true. Lots of people do. Sometimes they manage to get justice but quite often they don't. Yes we don't know if that happened here, but by the same measure you can't make such a claim either.

My point is not in rail companies they generally do not. Other industries sure, but in a heavily unionised one it is almost unheard of. Other processes could be the attendance for work procedure that leads to sacking (incredibly rare) or during probation (also very rare).
 

DoubleO

Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
208
Not sure if I've missed a post about this (other than the previous locked post) but ASLEF have announced an EIGHT WEEK strike at Hull Trains as a result of the recent dismissal dispute!
 

generalnerd

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2025
Messages
326
Location
Hull
It won’t affect services much as 5 of the managers are all driver managers, so them (and the drivers with RMT not aslef) can keep the service going with only two trains missed per day
 

LRV3004

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2015
Messages
527
It won’t affect services much as 5 of the managers are all driver managers, so them (and the drivers with RMT not aslef) can keep the service going with only two trains missed per day
Do Hull Trains have any RMT drivers? The only place I’ve heard of RMT drivers is on London Underground (I believe only 4% of drivers throughout the industry are RMT members)!
 

generalnerd

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2025
Messages
326
Location
Hull
Do Hull Trains have any RMT drivers? The only place I’ve heard of RMT drivers is on London Underground (I believe only 4% of drivers throughout the industry are RMT members)!
I’ve seen a driver wearing an RMT pin badge before but I could be mistaken (it may have been left over from a previous position)
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
18,051
Location
East Anglia
Do Hull Trains have any RMT drivers? The only place I’ve heard of RMT drivers is on London Underground (I believe only 4% of drivers throughout the industry are RMT members)!
It’s very rare for any RMT drivers on the National Rail network. ASLEF have stated that they have 100% membership at Hull Trains.
 

AverageJoe

On Moderation
Joined
23 Dec 2021
Messages
613
Location
United Kingdom
So its been reported that Hull Trains are going on strike because someone got sacked. Now I dont know if it was a justified or unjustified sacking. But surely this is riddiculous. Why dont they just go for unfair dismissal and take Hull Trains to court if they dont agree with the decision?
You answered it yourself, you don’t know of it was justified or not. So very few facts are known so it’s difficult to say if a strike is justified or not.

The suggestion is the driver was sacked not for an action but for raising a safety concern.
What that actually means I don’t know and it all sounds a little strange but it maybe a strike based on the bigger picture and it could be something any other driver could be facing in the future if not dealt with firmly now.

Again all just speculation at this point.
 

AverageJoe

On Moderation
Joined
23 Dec 2021
Messages
613
Location
United Kingdom
You answered it yourself, you don’t know of it was justified or not. So very few facts are known so it’s difficult to say if a strike is justified or not.

The suggestion is the driver was sacked not for an action but for raising a safety concern.
What that actually means I don’t know and it all sounds a little strange but it maybe a strike based on the bigger picture and it could be something any other driver could be facing in the future if not dealt with firmly now.

Again all just speculation at this point.
Here is the letter from aslef

Strike Action - Hull Trains​

Members at Hull Trains will take strike action for eight weeks from 31 March in defence of a driver who was sacked despite having done nothing wrong.

ASLEF has 100% membership at Hull Trains, and members are furious as their colleague was sacked after raising a safety concern. We all know that the railway is a safety critical environment, and there must be an open and fair attitude to reporting any concerns so that we can all be safe.

We have been very clear in all media interviews and with the company that this dereliction of duty on health and safety is not just damaging for the company but risks safety on the whole of the railway.

Solidarity with members taking industrial action.
 

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
3,055
It won’t affect services much as 5 of the managers are all driver managers, so them (and the drivers with RMT not aslef) can keep the service going with only two trains missed per day
Managers can't keep the service running seven days a week for eight weeks, no matter how much money you offer them.
 

generalnerd

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2025
Messages
326
Location
Hull
Managers can't keep the service running seven days a week for eight weeks, no matter how much money you offer them.
Hull trains only runs 7 return services a day so it should be easy for them especially as most drivers do 1&1/2 services per shift, especially when you consider an early and late train have been cancelled for 8 weeks straight
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,769
Not sure if I've missed a post about this (other than the previous locked post) but ASLEF have announced an EIGHT WEEK strike at Hull Trains as a result of the recent dismissal dispute!
That's a big commitment from the HT drivers..... clearly they have the sacked guys back
 

driverd

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2021
Messages
722
Location
UK
Hull trains only runs 7 return services a day so it should be easy for them especially as most drivers do 1&1/2 services per shift, especially when you consider an early and late train have been cancelled for 8 weeks straight

Driver managers can only work within the regs, though. So that's no more than 12 hour shifts and no more than 13 days out of 14.

That's before you get into the question of if the driver managers would actually be prepared to give up all their free time to do this.

Then, of course you need a cohort of managers who want to work 13 days straight and lodge in London several nights a week.

Sadly, having just review the strike timetable, I can't see these strikes having much impact without serious sacrifices from members.
 
Last edited:

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,346
That's a big commitment from the HT drivers..... clearly they have the sacked guys back
I guess it often depends on if or how much a union is able to financially support such workers during lengthy periods of industrial action.
 
Last edited:

WAB

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2015
Messages
1,140
Location
Anglia
No, apparently management can’t be apart of unions like that. I’m not sure why but that’s what I’ve heard.
Is this specific to Hull Trains? Managers are sometimes RMT or ASLEF if they were previously traincrew or other frontline roles. Otherwise, they’re normally TSSA or not unionised.
 

GordonT

Member
Joined
26 May 2018
Messages
1,082
Is this specific to Hull Trains? Managers are sometimes RMT or ASLEF if they were previously traincrew or other frontline roles. Otherwise, they’re normally TSSA or not unionised.
Would it be reasonable to suppose that "Open Access" TOCs are less likely to feel constrained by long-standing conventions in relation to matters such unionisation or otherwise of managers found in the mainstream TOCs?
 

PLY2AYS

Member
Joined
26 Mar 2024
Messages
202
Location
London
Would it be reasonable to suppose that "Open Access" TOCs are less likely to feel constrained by long-standing conventions in relation to matters such unionisation or otherwise of managers found in the mainstream TOCs?
Yes, but more importantly, they’re excluded from governmental subsidy and therefore strike action actually hits their profit margins (iirc)
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
2,974
Is this specific to Hull Trains? Managers are sometimes RMT or ASLEF if they were previously traincrew or other frontline roles. Otherwise, they’re normally TSSA or not unionised.

At Hull Trains they can be a member of any union they want but, like other TOCs, only certain unions have negotiating rights for specific grade groups.

When it comes to a disciplinary, anybody can advocate on behalf of the member of staff. It is usually, in the initial stage, the staff rep for the grade group but if it gets serious, the local union rep usually gets called in to take it on.

I was a TSSA rep in a maintenance depot and had to help NUR clerical staff on the odd occasion and my workshop rep colleague was NUR but “day to day” he looked after staff who were in all the “Confed” craft engineering unions.

Changing union in those days was not allowed and only when you got to senior management were you told to join the BTOG. I know a few managers who still stayed (on the quiet) in their previous union and had dual membership!

Today there are a lot of staff who are not members of a union. My plea to them is to join up, it’s the cheapest railway employment legal insurance & help you will ever get. And when you need it, you need it fast. Today (in old BR money) I’m a SM grade but still a TSSA member and will remain one.
 

generalnerd

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2025
Messages
326
Location
Hull
Is this specific to Hull Trains? Managers are sometimes RMT or ASLEF if they were previously traincrew or other frontline roles. Otherwise, they’re normally TSSA or not unionised.
I believe so, or at least it’s something along those lines (it was an unofficial agreement between management and drivers due to their being so few drivers at hull trains, all the management voting against something could be enough to flip it if enough normal drivers haven’t voted/voted against action)

Things could have changed as it was a few years since I’ve talked to the driver I got this info from though, so take it with a grain of salt.
 

GordonT

Member
Joined
26 May 2018
Messages
1,082
Every employee has the right to join a union, even if upper management don't like it.
That's perfectly true and the same goes for remaining in a union or joining a different union to the previous one. However presumably these rights need to be weighed up alongside the "culture" existing within the company for individuals (such as driver managers employed by First Hull Trains to keep this "on topic") to determine whether belonging to a union or not belonging to a union will serve their interests better. It doesn't sound as if the unionised drivers have much (any?) bargaining power in this fairly unusual situation.
 

Justin Smith

Established Member
Joined
14 Nov 2009
Messages
1,247
Location
Sheffield
I speak as a (very) small employer, but the thing I don't understand about all of this is that if an employee is a good conscientious worker why would an employer want to get rid of them ?
On the other hand if the employee is not so good or conscientious then why should the employer be expected to keep employing them ?
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
4,251
That's before you get into the question of if the driver managers would actually be prepared to give up all their free time to do this.

Don’t forget as they are driver managers a lot of the ‘day job’ won’t exist for this period of time as the drivers they manage will be on strike. However will be a huge backlog afterwards.
 
Last edited:

HLE

Established Member
Joined
27 Dec 2013
Messages
1,417
It will. Drivers competency cycle will still require FDA's and downloads which won't be able to be completed given the strike action. Easier all round if this situation was resolved.
 

GordonT

Member
Joined
26 May 2018
Messages
1,082
I speak as a (very) small employer, but the thing I don't understand about all of this is that if an employee is a good conscientious worker why would an employer want to get rid of them ?
On the other hand if the employee is not so good or conscientious then why should the employer be expected to keep employing them ?
I've no idea what the circumstances of the Hull Trains dispute are. Hypothetically it's perfectly possible to envisage a situation where an employee's attitude is a bit of a thorn in the flesh of his/her superiors but who is popular with his/her peers and a chance is seized to bin the individual for a specific misdemeanour which is a borderline dismissible offence generating hostility from the peers who argue that the action taken against their chum was way too harsh.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top