• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Great Northern Fleet - 379s introduction

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,650
Location
Ely
One of the 379 diagrams still seems to be cancelled as of the early afternoon. Really not going well this is it?…

Both trains I intended to catch today (the 0947 Ely to Kings Cross and the 1709 Kings Cross to Kings Lynn) have been cancelled - in both cases the reason on RTT is 'This service was cancelled due to the planned train being replaced with a slower train (MS)'. I'm not entirely sure what that means (if it is a 'not exactly accurate' RTT cancellation reason) - but has the diagram changed for either of these? They *were* 387s.

At this point, I have to say I'd have preferred to keep the 387s and let the 379s go elsewhere. The service we get on GN is bad enough already without further disruption/cancellations/short-forms caused by this change. Maybe I'll change my mind once things are properly bedded in, but so far I'm not persuaded.
 
Joined
13 Jan 2024
Messages
404
Location
Cambridge
At this point, I have to say I'd have preferred to keep the 387s and let the 379s go elsewhere.
Where else would they have gone? They wanted to have more third rail trains (which 387s are, and 379s aren't), so they needed to get the 387s off Great Northern and replace them with something else, which was the 379s
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,650
Location
Ely
Where else would they have gone?

No idea, I'm just venting. It is unacceptable that Cambridge North has been left with just one service departing (in any direction!) between 1739 and 1834 tonight, particularly given it is largely supposed to be a station for commuters to use.

In any event, that 1 service - 1T51, the 1710 off KLN, was a 379(!) formed of 379027+379017. My first time on a 379 since probably 2019, and yeah - it's a marginal improvement over a 387, but not massive. On the whole I'd rather have a reliable service. Hopefully today is just the new timetable bedding down, we'll see.
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,238
Location
Central Belt
I understand an extra diagram was converted from 387 to 379 today, so you could be the lucky winner. We saw this a lot when the 700s (and 387s) we introduced. Where the trains were cancelled because they happened to have a no train driver on part of it. Not sure what % of GN drivers are trained for the 379.
 

TSGN Spotter

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2023
Messages
38
Location
Kings Lynn
1T02 started at Cambridge formed by the stock off 1T05, 1T05 cancelled at Cambridge. 1T05 this morning not 379s, seems like 387173 and another 387
 
Last edited:

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,238
Location
Central Belt
The 0656 was cancelled again, assuming because of lack of a driver signing the 379. Certainly Deja vu back to the days when the 700s and 387s were introduced, however the big difference back then was it was often possible to put another type of train on the diagram as the stock was not released until they were confident they could deliver the service. With the 387s already gone they don't have that luxury this time (No sure if anyone is winning here, Southern are suffering because the 377s have already gone) - I assume SouthEastern are the only happy ones with this current cascade.
 

Royston Vasey

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
2,508
Location
Cambridge
Special stop orders for Foxton, Shepreth and Meldreth inserted into 1T07 06:10 KLN-KGX between the two cancelled 2Cs. Decent service recovery, making gaps in service 37 and 47 minutes rather than 90 minutes compared to the usual 30 minutes.

1T07 was 7 late at Royston and 6 late at Kings Cross. Not terrible. A lot of those passengers would have been either local journeys or aiming to change onto 1T07 at Royston anyway so shouldn't have overwhelmed it.

A few knock on cancellations the 2C/1T circuit now though and some unrelated heavy delays around Potters Bar and Hatfield coming back north. Not the best morning for Great Northern.

Fortunately I'm booked from Whittlesford this morning, as usual a haven of green On Time serenity.
 
Last edited:

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,650
Location
Ely
0717 Letchworth to KGX, 0812 KGX to Ely, 0947 Ely to KGX cancelled for the second day in a row. Guess I'll be late to work for the second day running.

0842 KGX to KLN cancelled as well as that is the next journey for the 0656 off Cambridge (though yesterday they managed to run the 0842 despite the 0656 being cancelled - not today).

More ways for things to go wrong on GN, over-and-above the usual mess of a service, was not really what we were looking for, but looks like that's what this 379 introduction is doing.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,784
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Is it fair to deduce it's mostly a case of not enough drivers trained on 379s, rather than faults with the units?

Think it’s a bit of both.

The 1327 Letchworth to King’s Cross has now been cancelled on four out of the five most recent weekdays it was scheduled to run. According to RTT, three of these were crew-related and one was train-related.

One way or other, it isn’t good enough. Once again GTR are demonstrating that operationally they’re just not up to the task of delivering the basics, in other words a train turning up at the time it’s meant to.

The GN could do without this at the moment, performance has already been bad enough over recent months, users could do without more trouble. As has been said before, all GN users are really getting out of this is different seats.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
5,455
The 0656 was cancelled again, assuming because of lack of a driver signing the 379. Certainly Deja vu back to the days when the 700s and 387s were introduced, however the big difference back then was it was often possible to put another type of train on the diagram as the stock was not released until they were confident they could deliver the service. With the 387s already gone they don't have that luxury this time (No sure if anyone is winning here, Southern are suffering because the 377s have already gone) - I assume SouthEastern are the only happy ones with this current cascade.
Are the cascade dates set in stone? Have any 465 or 466 gone off lease recently? Are any coming up due for overhaul? If not, ploughing on with the cascade and then cancelling trains owing to lack of stock seems like an odd strategy.
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,650
Location
Ely
Oh good, 1T48 (1709 KGX-KLN) is cancelled again, just like yesterday. And 1T51 (1710 KLN-KGX) - last night a 379, tonight cancelled.

Result : *zero* trains from Cambridge North tonight between 1739 and 1832, in any direction. Wonderful.
 

Class455

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2016
Messages
1,452
Oh good, 1T48 (1709 KGX-KLN) is cancelled again, just like yesterday. And 1T51 (1710 KLN-KGX) - last night a 379, tonight cancelled.

Result : *zero* trains from Cambridge North tonight between 1739 and 1832, in any direction. Wonderful.
1T48’s cancellation was for a reason completely unrelated to the 379 introduction, just for the record.
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,650
Location
Ely
1T48’s cancellation was for a reason completely unrelated to the 379 introduction, just for the record.

I admit I'm clearly having bad luck, but the last 2 days I've had 4 out of 4 trains I intended to catch cancelled, so I'm currently a little bit fed up with GN (even more than usual!).

Though to be fair, it isn't especially GN's fault that the timetable at Cambridge North is so rubbish at exactly the time commuters may actually want to use the station. (As above, between 1740-1831 there are only 2 services timetabled to leave CMB, both of which are GN (and both cancelled tonight). By comparison, between 1840-1931 there are 7 services timetabled...). So the impact of these two cancellations tonight is somewhat greater than they would be at other times of day.

--

Wednesday 21st : much better today, just about everything seems to have run. Of course today I wasn't trying to travel (!) so still waiting to see whether any of my regular services have become a 379 diagram.

--

Thursday 22nd : 0947 Ely-KGX ran today, and was a 8-car 379... Assuming it is now diagrammed as such, I guess that explains the cancellations earlier this week.
 
Last edited:

Class455

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2016
Messages
1,452
How many 379's are currently still at Worksop? I'm assuming all units in storage have at least visited Hornsey by now!
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,650
Location
Ely
0947 Ely-KGX cancelled again this morning - or rather started at Letchworth, the incoming service (the 0812 from Kings Cross) having terminated short there. Supposedly due to 'driver shortage'.

Assuming yesterday's run was indicative, this appears to be a 379 service now. I hope they do rather better running this from now on than they've managed this week.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
29,480
Location
UK
Then there are the DOO camera issues that meant some 379 runs couldn't call at a load of unstaffed stations. As such, it was effectively a cancelled train for a lot of people.
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,650
Location
Ely
0947 Ely-KGX cancelled again this morning - or rather started at Letchworth, the incoming service (the 0812 from Kings Cross) having terminated short there.

...and the next service on this diagram (2C24 KGX to CBG) has been terminated at Letchworth too (and hence the 1326 from Cambridge is cancelled). What's going on with these services only able to get as far as Letchworth?

Actually, looks like the diagram has been cancelled for the rest of the day - 1512 KGX-KLN and 1710 KLN-KGX already reporting as cancelled too.

Going really well.
 

windjabbers

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2014
Messages
61
Location
Cambridge
How many 379's are currently still at Worksop? I'm assuming all units in storage have at least visited Hornsey by now!
I think this is the possible location of all units at the moment. But not sure 019 is still at Peterbo. 004/021/025 and 028 may have started working and Ive just missed them. BW DC

in service with GTR based at HE13001/002/006/010/016/017/020/022/023/024/026/027/029
At Hornsey but not in passenger service4004/021/025/028
Stored at Peterbo Nene Sidings1019
Stored at Worksop12003/005/007/008/009/011/012/013/014/015/018/030
 

whoosh

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2008
Messages
1,621
Then there are the DOO camera issues that meant some 379 runs couldn't call at a load of unstaffed stations. As such, it was effectively a cancelled train for a lot of people.

...and the next service on this diagram (2C24 KGX to CBG) has been terminated at Letchworth too (and hence the 1326 from Cambridge is cancelled). What's going on with these services only able to get as far as Letchworth?

Actually, looks like the diagram has been cancelled for the rest of the day - 1512 KGX-KLN and 1710 KLN-KGX already reporting as cancelled too.

Going really well.
They have slightly different cameras and monitors to 387s. In order to be 'cleared' to use a platform in passenger service they should've undergone a test run, where the DOO camera images are assessed to be satisfactory with regard to station lighting etc.

There was a limited number of stations where this had been done - hence the Peterborough and Letchworth services starting up in the last timetable - but I'm not sure off the top of my head whether any more have been added.
 

Top