• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Police presence on late night trains.

Status
Not open for further replies.

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,787
Location
Herts
Used to have terrible problems on the 2320 Watford - Euston and the 2317 Euston to Watford DC trains , despite precautions being taken , they were virtually no go areas and damaged / soiled on many occasions. Late trains on the St Albans branch were removed for this reason - and this was back in the 90's. The problem in London can transfer (thanks to many all night clubs etc). to very early morning trains on Sat - and less so on a Sunday. Much of it drink related of course , but drugs also an issue - as most teenagers can get these easier than "legal" alcohol.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

JGR

Member
Joined
31 Jan 2012
Messages
147
Location
Ipswich
If you remove "problem trains" then the trains or other public transport immediately before or after just become problematic instead.
Likewise if you make drinks in pubs more expensive, people will get drunk elsewhere to the same effect.

You could also argue that there is perhaps a greater need for more police in the drinking areas themselves, rather than on transport leading away.
 

David Dunning

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2009
Messages
208
Location
York
An old fart's point of view.
The two services - the 2320 ex MCO and the 2338 ex LIV - should both be withdrawn on the basis that the cost of policing them far outweighs the revenue earned, and the users of the two services seem to have repeatedly proved that they cannot be trusted to behave in a decent and socially acceptable manner.
The legal minimum age for purchasing alcohol and consuming alcohol in any public place including the street should be raised to 25.

interesting point , but if you examine race day trains in York and the last York to Middlesboro on a Saturday you'd be best off increasing the legal minimum age to 65
 

142094

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2009
Messages
8,789
Location
Newcastle
I've noticed in the past few years that the early morning services (around 0600) can be problematic due to those staying out a lot longer and going home on the first trains back. Equally, with the tendency to pre-drink at home then go out, trains on some nights after say 8pm can also have a lot of drunks and trouble makers.
 

tony6499

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2012
Messages
887
I've noticed in the past few years that the early morning services (around 0600) can be problematic due to those staying out a lot longer and going home on the first trains back. Equally, with the tendency to pre-drink at home then go out, trains on some nights after say 8pm can also have a lot of drunks and trouble makers.

Totally agree, the problem hours range from early evening and a visit to Tescos and start the drinking on the journey in right through till 0600 and even later the next morning.

Not sure what the railways can do as it is a social problem
 

142094

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2009
Messages
8,789
Location
Newcastle
Not sure what the railways can do as it is a social problem

Not much unfortunately, just pick up the pieces. Classic example last month I had was a drunk passed out on the platform at half 5 in the morning, who must have arrived at the station between the shutters opening and the first train. In the past this would have been say a Saturday or Sunday morning (this time a Tuesday morning), but it seems as if every night is now party night for some people.
 

merlodlliw

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2009
Messages
5,852
Location
Wrexham/ Denbighshire /Flintshire triangle
See the US, drinking age is 21 meaning they can do all of the above but not buy alcohol. Also note it doesn't appear to prevent any problems around excessive drinking. Indeed there is a school of thought growing over there that making the age 21 is making the problem worse...

Prohobiting drinking until 25 will do nothing, at all, to prevent the current issues we face.

The US had prohibition, it did not stop people drinking, they drank bootleg booze, distilled in a bath & many went blind. Many of these youngsters pick up the habit in Spain on holiday where the duty is less, or an all in deal.

Age will make no difference. BTW all US states have different drinking laws. Under 21s drink in the US, but in many States someone else buys it. Problem is drugs are easier to obtain in the US & GB, & what the hell is a shot, another word for paint stripper
 
Last edited:

sheff1

Established Member
Joined
24 Dec 2009
Messages
5,496
Location
Sheffield
About a year ago, Scotrail introduced a no drinking / no drunks policy after 2100. Has anyone had first hand experience on whether this has had a noticable change on late night trains ?
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,787
Location
Herts
Not much unfortunately, just pick up the pieces. Classic example last month I had was a drunk passed out on the platform at half 5 in the morning, who must have arrived at the station between the shutters opening and the first train. In the past this would have been say a Saturday or Sunday morning (this time a Tuesday morning), but it seems as if every night is now party night for some people.

Regrettably a fact of life - you see the odd "casualty" on Thameslink mid week - recall assisting one with a bottle of vodka on the go at / before 6am - a real societal problem. But one even the Continent has to contend with.....
 

Aldaniti

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2009
Messages
669
Totally agree, the problem hours range from early evening and a visit to Tescos and start the drinking on the journey in right through till 0600 and even later the next morning.

Not sure what the railways can do as it is a social problem

The first train from Wigan Wallgate on a Saturday morning can sometimes be a more unpleasant experience than necessary. Another legacy of that awful man, Tony Blair.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
broadgage:1574125 said:
Highly likely that they were there at the request of the TOC, either - most probably - by prior arrangement because it is a 'problem' train, or perhaps due to a particular incident or an event that evening. It would be superb if every saturday night train had a copper in every carriage, alas sadly not. Some services suffer from significant issues so frequently that arrangements are made for the train to be accompanied every time (sometimes only after the crews have refused to work it otherwise). There are also a fair few which are double crewed, with two Guards or similar as an extra precaution. The 20.20 from Weymouth on a saturday when showing a full quota has two Guards, two Drivers, BTP and the area on call manager on board, plus a booze ban. Sometimes they manage to find space for a few passengers too! And usually a few idiots will still kick off :-l

I can see the point of 2 guards, plus police, and a manager, but why 2 drivers ?

I have a feeling the second Driver just ended up travelling on it to get back, that may not be the case any more. The rest of the entourage is still supposed to be there every week however!

I personally think the recent proposals for 'drunk tanks' are a worthwhile idea. P*ssed idiots need something substantially more unpleasant than the threat of a copper picking them up off the floor and sending them home. A couple of overnights sleeping in a pool of communial puke and with nothing available to soothe a sore head might well encourage a little more responsibility in some.
 

8J

Member
Joined
31 Aug 2009
Messages
648
The way to combat this in my opinion is not to increase the legal drinking age. It is to employ investigators to track down and punish these offenders. More CCTV on the trains and better tecniques used by the BTP and rail industry to track down these offenders. I don't think Northern Trains 150's or 156's have CCTV do they?

Another interesting fact is that 'The National Service Bill" is currently being reviewed in parliament. I think that a way to combat anti social behaviour would not be to send every male youth to the army for a year (in my experience, its the females who are the worst! ) what that should do is say that anyone with any criminal record whatsoever between the ages of 18-26 has to do a year of national service. Essentially this is an incentive for people to be more responsible on their nights out to avoid national service. Thoughts?
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,058
Location
UK
I think national service (or something similar) could work wonders. In theory at least.

One problem is that the army probably doesn't want some of these people, as by 18 onwards a lot of bad attitudes have already become habitual.

Learning respect is probably something needed from a very early age at school.
 

Wyvern

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2009
Messages
1,573
Just make sure you keep away from the garrison towns of a weekend.

Out of sight. Out of mind. ?
 

beano900

Member
Joined
30 Jul 2013
Messages
59
Ah, the P1sshead Express as I like to call it. Been on it quite a few times, mainly after having a few myself. I've never seen any problems but I wouldn't fancy traveling on it sober. Lots of loud people taking utter nonsense within the confines of a Northern sprinter.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,686
Location
Redcar
One problem is that the army probably doesn't want some of these people, as by 18 onwards a lot of bad attitudes have already become habitual.

Forget if the army want them or not (though the answer would be no they don't) I'm not sure many taxpayers will want it once they realise how expensive it would be to train, equip and maintain all the extra troops National Service would entail...
 

Greenback

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Messages
15,268
Location
Llanelli
If you remove "problem trains" then the trains or other public transport immediately before or after just become problematic instead.

Agreed.

Likewise if you make drinks in pubs more expensive, people will get drunk elsewhere to the same effect.

This has already happened. Many people now start drinking supermarket booze before leaving the house to go out. They might then have a couple in the pub to get well tanked up before heading off to a nightspot. I see this frequently around here on Saturday evening trains. When going into Swansea from Llanelli on a late Saturday afternoon or early evening, it is obvious who has been drinking for some hours at home! They often have drinks with them, probably bought from the local Tesco.

Naturally, those heading off for a night out are in good spirits and there is not normally the problems associated with later trains. When people are heading home they are not always in the same happy frame of mind as when they went out. Arguments with friends and partners become greatly exaggerated where copious amounts of alcohol are involved, and such things often contribute to the trouble that occasionally flares up.
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,851
Location
St Neots
Ah, the P1sshead Express as I like to call it. Been on it quite a few times, mainly after having a few myself. I've never seen any problems but I wouldn't fancy traveling on it sober. Lots of loud people taking utter nonsense within the confines of a Northern sprinter.

I was on the LIV-MCO once, there was a small group of sobers who autonomously grouped in the seats near the rear cab. It was a Pacer that time too.
 

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
Wasn't it the Manchester football derby on Saturday?

It was on Sunday, not sure what public transport was like though. I didn't hear anything so it was ok?

As for the national service I find it's most ardent supporters are those who are ineligible! Would they be willing to do so? Germany got rid of her equivalent a couple of years ago now and it would cost a lot of taxpayer money.
 
Last edited:

Drsatan

Established Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
1,885
Location
Land of the Sprinters
As for the national service I find it's most ardent supporters are those who are ineligible! Would they be willing to do so? Germany got rid of her equivalent a couple of years ago now and it would cost a lot of taxpayer money.

The other issue of National Service is that most armies of first world countries (with a few exceptions, like Turkey) which have compulsory military service are phasing it out for a number of reasons:

  • The increasingly mechanised nature of warfare means that large armies of poorly trained conscripts are no longer viable
  • Poor quality conscripts may not be able to be trained on how to use advanced equipment (like anti-tank missile launchers, air defence missiles, infantry fighting vehicles etc)
  • Trained conscripts won't have the same fighting capacity as trained volunteers
  • Some conscripts may be unfit for military service (mental health issues, issues with authority, asthma, diabetes etc)

Russia is a country with a large conscript army, and lots of Russian men avoid military service at all costs due to the poor conditions, as this article shows
 
Joined
29 Nov 2010
Messages
139
Location
Glasgow
About a year ago, Scotrail introduced a no drinking / no drunks policy after 2100. Has anyone had first hand experience on whether this has had a noticable change on late night trains ?

It was never really much of a problem to be honest.

And if you're in a fit state with a few mates and not being loud the guard normally has no problem with it (a couple of times coming back from football games we've simply not noticed the time going past 9pm and are still having a beer and this has happened, sometimes been asked to hold it off the tables, sometimes they don't say anything).
 

GodAtum

On Moderation
Joined
11 Dec 2009
Messages
2,637
I finish workj at 1am but stay in the office until 6am to avoid drunks.
 

bAzTNM

Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
342
I've noticed in the past few years that the early morning services (around 0600) can be problematic due to those staying out a lot longer and going home on the first trains back.
Yeah. I'm just a passenger but you always get the angry, ****ed off drunks at that time in the morning. You do get the odd "WHAT YOU LOOKING AT? !" from them. Saturday morning trains are the worst.
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,332
The other issue of National Service is that most armies of first world countries (with a few exceptions, like Turkey) which have compulsory military service are phasing it out for a number of reasons:

  • The increasingly mechanised nature of warfare means that large armies of poorly trained conscripts are no longer viable
  • Poor quality conscripts may not be able to be trained on how to use advanced equipment (like anti-tank missile launchers, air defence missiles, infantry fighting vehicles etc)
  • Trained conscripts won't have the same fighting capacity as trained volunteers
  • Some conscripts may be unfit for military service (mental health issues, issues with authority, asthma, diabetes etc)

Russia is a country with a large conscript army, and lots of Russian men avoid military service at all costs due to the poor conditions, as this article shows

They do make excellent cannon fodder though!
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
telstarbox:1575776 said:
What happens on the evening trains off Weymouth?

On the saturday 20.20, just general antisocial behaviour from drunken scum with no place in civilised society. Many of them tend to alight at Yeovil, with some continuing on to Trowbridge and further to Bristol. Common highlights include drunken brawls, vandalism and general loud, p*ssed yobbishness showing a complete disregard for families and other decent people travelling on board. A prime example of a train which really shouldn't be running - decent people don't want to travel like that, drunk yobs don't deserve their own personal taxi that keeps coming back regardless week after week. It's a shame, but the last train out on a saturday needs to be about half past 5 so it just isn't worth the idiots making the journey.
 

Tracked

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2011
Messages
1,245
Location
53.5440°N 1.1510°W
I've used late night trains round Doncaster fairly often, not seen any trouble other than a few drunks being louder than normal, but no-one seems to be able to use a bin anymore <( wrappers with half-eaten food left everywhere but the bins (ok, they are fairly small on a 321, but still), stinks out the whole carriage.
 

SGS

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2011
Messages
180
I was on a London-Newcastle run on Saturday evening, which the BTP attended twice. At Peterborough, a couple of ticketless lads sitting in a FC vestibule were removed, then at Doncaster a larger group were removed after a "disturbance". I was wondering - what do the BTP typically then do with people they've removed? I ask because I'm sure it's happened to people on here loads of times...:lol:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top