If you're not someone who knows well in advance when they want to travel and can book accordingly, that seems to be what XC want to encourage you to do.To hell with it, I'll just drive.
If you're not someone who knows well in advance when they want to travel and can book accordingly, that seems to be what XC want to encourage you to do.To hell with it, I'll just drive.
People's feet on the seats isn't allowed, there was a case in the news over the last few years where someone got fined for doing that. Seats with bags on probably won't make too much difference, if the luggage racks and overhead shelfs are full, that luggage has to go somewhere.
I've certainly gone into a busy restaurant "walk-up" and been told that I could take a given table but only for an hour or so, which is about as close as it could really get. (Restaurants, unlike trains, are compulsory reservation when busy).
But it's not a pointless infatuation with technology. It can enhance the journey experience.
Imagine if when you bought a walk-up ticket you could get a reservation, even with seat selection, as you did so. Or the TVM would warn you that you were going (or very likely) to be standing. Perhaps you'd reconsider your choice of train? Or if you couldn't you'd at least know.
Coupled with the idea of having reserved coaches/areas and unreserved coaches/areas with permanent marking, and lots of ways to obtain reservations including for existing tickets (TVM, text, ticket office, online, app etc), this could abolish the Euston scrum and the likes, as well as solve the problem of malfunctioning reservation systems and unplaced reservations, without having any of the disadvantages of true compulsory reservations. And that would be a very, very good thing indeed.
OK, you can't stand on a plane - but how much less stressful is flying low-cost now the seating scrum has gone? And how much more civilised is the cinema now you can select your seat online and wander up once you've had time to get your overpriced popcorn rather than having to rush when the screen opens for a good seat/to sit together?
There is only one way to abolish the scrum and that is mandatory reservation at least onto the train. There will always be a scrum when there are more passengers than seats.
There arent many restaurants that would seat an unbooked customer and then continue taking reservations for the same table - turfing them out halfway through their meal or even offering a table on condition they pack up and leave if there is a subsequent booking.
TMR is quite mad.
I've no doubt that the system will let them reserve seats a lot closer to the fact than the times they've quoted but certainly in the case of VTWC that is (was?) their stated cutoff time when I've tried to get/change reservations.I've managed to reserve seats with an Advance First on VTWC (and connecting XC Turbostar) less than three hours before departure.
Err, bags on seats are not allowed.
I'm confused what does this thread have to do with restaurants?
Where do you propose bags go if all the luggage storage areas are full? If it's a suitcase it's either it goes on a seat or blocks the gangway
I'm confused what does this thread have to do with restaurants? They're completely different from trains! I mean, we could talk about all manner of things that either require or have optional reservations, but that doesn't make them relevant!
To hell with it, I'll just drive.
That puts it very well indeed.Reserving a seat half way through a journey when someone else is sitting there seems very much akin to a restaurant serving someone, then providing the table to someone else half way through their meal.
If XC are trying to manage demand, whch may well be the case for all I know, then those who choose to drive, and those like me who avoid XC as much as they can, are helping them to achieve their goal.
I's a shame that we don't have more enlioghtened views in the UK, as in other European countries I suspect that the trains used will have been fit for purpose in the first palce.
Would a new build of 12car 802s be more fit for purpose then their current fleet
Sure, the current fleet could use doubling up, but where on earth do you get 12 cars from?
You've got things like the disabled bogs, wheelchair spaces, buffet etc to come out of the total length. It would also allow larger luggage racks in each coach
The scrum would be much smaller and much less dangerous if, until all reservable seats were reserved, each passenger arriving at Euston could reserve one at their leisure at a TVM or similar.
XC could solve their problems by taking on some HST's from the ECML when they become available. Whether it actually happens is another matter.
The scrum would be much smaller and much less dangerous if, until all reservable seats were reserved, each passenger arriving at Euston could reserve one at their leisure at a TVM or similar.
That's what is needed. An example given by XC for the Ten Minute Reservation system is "TMR BHM MAN 0757 1ST" as the text to reserve a seat in First on the 0757 Birmingham to Manchester. If you're already in a free seat, why couldn't this work with, say, "TMR BHM MAN 0757 A32". The system would presumably know if the seat were already reserved, say, from Stoke to Macclesfield and could either refuse the request or reserve to Stoke only in a confirming text.As for the 10 minute reservations - surely it can't be beyond the whit of man to design a system that allows passengers to reserve a seat while at the seat - either yourself of via the ticket inspector?
That's what is needed. An example given by XC for the Ten Minute Reservation system is "TMR BHM MAN 0757 1ST" as the text to reserve a seat in First on the 0757 Birmingham to Manchester. If you're already in a free seat, why couldn't this work with, say, "TMR BHM MAN 0757 A32". The system would presumably know if the seat were already reserved, say, from Stoke to Macclesfield and could either refuse the request or reserve to Stoke only in a confirming text.
In principle, it's a good system, but it seems to have been implemented in a cheap and nasty version that completely ignores the needs of one not insignificant group of passengers.
If the numbers stacked up financially then I'm sure they would. They are out to maximise their revenue take which minimises any subsidy than needs to be paid.XC could improve the experience of thousands of their customer each week by using their existing HSTs.
If the numbers stacked up financially then I'm sure they would. They are out to maximise their revenue take which minimises any subsidy than needs to be paid.
Then subsidy will increase.They shouldn't have a choice.
Then subsidy will increase.
Then subsidy will increase.