• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Poll: What TV channel do you watch the news on?

What TV News do you watch

  • BBC News

  • ITN News (ITV, C4, C5)

  • Sky News

  • Euronews (or other NBC owned news)

  • CNN

  • France24

  • RT (RT UK, RT US, RT International)

  • Al Jazeera

  • CGTN (CCTV News)

  • Other news channel


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

big all

On Moderation
Joined
23 Sep 2018
Messages
876
Location
redhill
If you use the Asda or ebay web-sites, then you get advertising. You don't have to give your preferences, web-sites will automatically work them out themselves. For example, Asda and ebay will know what you buy from them, and what kinds of things you search for on their sites, and tailor their in-site advertising accordingly. Likewise whichever search engine you use to do web-searches will know your preferences.

It is sensible to limit your on-line exposure - I am amazed at the number of people who announce to the world that they are away from home, for example. But it is foolish to imagine that you can use the web and be totally anonymous.
i get no advetising at at all i wont give exact methods as these sited rely on advertising but i get nill i wont use a site that requires me to have adverts
but for beduewelld 2 i havent managed to work a way through so for the say 5 maybe 10% off the time then its fold down the screen till its finished and never watch
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

HH

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2009
Messages
4,505
Location
Essex
It amuses me that I'm only a few years younger than Paul, but our attitudes to technology are generations apart.

I don't watch TV News; in fact I don't watch TV; I watch a few programmes via catch-up or very occasionally streaming services. I'm usually alerted to big (general) news stories by my watch, on which, like my phone and iPad, I have a News App that gets news from multiple other sites.

If I'm interested in a story, I usually research it on my desktop, using Google, which I am very adept with (your results depend on what you search). I use two adblockers, which I only turn off on a few small sites so they get the revenue; I use several ways to clear out unwanted cookies. I don't generally see much advertising online.
 

PeterC

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Messages
4,086
My ex once accused me of "glorying in other people's misery" for turning the TV on to watch the news oncew
and delete your cookies often
Or just use "private browsing".
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
8,185
What's the law r/e TV licence if - say - you cut off all your aerial/s inc. satellite so you can't receive "live" TV? Thinking I rarely watch live TV save for the news - it's all mostly catch-up/youtube?

Secondly, again r/e TV licence, would it apply if you watched "live" stuff from Eurosport web player or Now TV - ie. casting the programmes to your TV from your phone? If that counts as a live broadcast then I suppose you have to pay for a licence, but further down the chain if someone gets a live video call on Skype - would that need a licence?

Note - this isn't supposed to be a question about should we have a TV licence at all; maybe another thread! But about the practical situation r/e if it's needed.
 

A Challenge

Established Member
Joined
24 Sep 2016
Messages
2,823
What's the law r/e TV licence if - say - you cut off all your aerial/s inc. satellite so you can't receive "live" TV? Thinking I rarely watch live TV save for the news - it's all mostly catch-up/youtube?
You don't need a licence unless you are watching any live broadcast TV (presumably including the radio channels, but of course not DAB/FM) (BBC or otherwise) or using BBC iPlayer for TV (note you don't need one for listening to any type of radio on BBC iPlayer Radio/BBC Sounds).
 

Ken H

On Moderation
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,308
Location
N Yorks
What's the law r/e TV licence if - say - you cut off all your aerial/s inc. satellite so you can't receive "live" TV? Thinking I rarely watch live TV save for the news - it's all mostly catch-up/youtube?

Secondly, again r/e TV licence, would it apply if you watched "live" stuff from Eurosport web player or Now TV - ie. casting the programmes to your TV from your phone? If that counts as a live broadcast then I suppose you have to pay for a licence, but further down the chain if someone gets a live video call on Skype - would that need a licence?

Note - this isn't supposed to be a question about should we have a TV licence at all; maybe another thread! But about the practical situation r/e if it's needed.
if you watch live streaming in your home you need a licence.
If you use BBC's i-player at home you need a licence.

If you take your device to the pub you dont - but the pub does.

If you sit on the park and dont use wifi - I dunno

a licence is for a dwelling, not a person

If you use the interweb for looking at live streaming @ home, how will TV licencing know? That would be your moral dilemma.

If you decide not to have a licence, make sure neither you nor your family let anybody from TV licencing in your house and dont tell them anything. They have no right of entry to your home. They are salesmen on commission, not law enforcement officers. If they want to enter your home they need a policemen with a search warrant and to get one of those they need evidence you are breaking the law.
 

Calthrop

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2015
Messages
3,305
It amuses me that I'm only a few years younger than Paul, but our attitudes to technology are generations apart.

I don't watch TV News; in fact I don't watch TV; I watch a few programmes via catch-up or very occasionally streaming services. I'm usually alerted to big (general) news stories by my watch, on which, like my phone and iPad, I have a News App that gets news from multiple other sites.

If I'm interested in a story, I usually research it on my desktop, using Google, which I am very adept with (your results depend on what you search). I use two adblockers, which I only turn off on a few small sites so they get the revenue; I use several ways to clear out unwanted cookies. I don't generally see much advertising online.

I slightly resemble you here; save for being less likely to be interested in stories. In the interests of remaining (kind-of) sane, and reducing impulses toward suicide caused by musing on the state of the world: so far as I possibly can, I ignore news and current affairs -- no TV or radio news, no newspapers, no deliberate seeking-out of other newsfeeds. Should World War III or zombie apocalypse be imminent, stuff popping up on my computer screen, not actively sought, will tip me off. This works for me -- I tend to consider the ostrich a wiser bird, than it's given credit for.
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
2,698
What's the law r/e TV licence if - say - you cut off all your aerial/s inc. satellite so you can't receive "live" TV? Thinking I rarely watch live TV save for the news - it's all mostly catch-up/youtube?

Secondly, again r/e TV licence, would it apply if you watched "live" stuff from Eurosport web player or Now TV - ie. casting the programmes to your TV from your phone? If that counts as a live broadcast then I suppose you have to pay for a licence, but further down the chain if someone gets a live video call on Skype - would that need a licence?

Note - this isn't supposed to be a question about should we have a TV licence at all; maybe another thread! But about the practical situation r/e if it's needed.

https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one should be pretty definitive.
You need to be covered by a TV Licence to

  • watch or record programmes as they’re being shown on TV or live on an online TV service
  • download or watch BBC programmes on iPlayer.

What device you're watching it on is fairly irrelevant. If you're out and about on a mobile device, you're supposed to be covered by your 'home' licence, so you need to have one.
A Skype call wouldn't be a TV programme, so wouldn't count. Or do you mean someone pointing their end of the Skype call at a playing TV?
 

Ken H

On Moderation
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,308
Location
N Yorks
https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one should be pretty definitive.


What device you're watching it on is fairly irrelevant. If you're out and about on a mobile device, you're supposed to be covered by your 'home' licence, so you need to have one.
A Skype call wouldn't be a TV programme, so wouldn't count. Or do you mean someone pointing their end of the Skype call at a playing TV?
how o earth are they going to prove you have been watching TV on your mobile in the park? or in the pub while not plugged in. stupid unenforceable law.
 

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
1,650
I rarely watch live TV. Most of what I watch is recorded, or catch-up. I can then watch what I want when I want, depending on my mood at the time, rather than what is scheduled at that time. This is undoubtedly an improvement, and I chafe when watching live TV. However, the downside I have come to find with this method of viewing is that you tend to get locked into a pattern of viewing, and don't realise that there are other things that you might enjoy in the same way as watching live TV, when you can stumble across something by accident. The players will recommend things for you to watch, based on what you have watched before. Just like the news feeds that tailor themselves to your preferences, your range is subtly limited.

I do worry that we are increasingly living in our own little bubbles. Technology that has undoubtedly expanded our horizons, is now subtly limiting them. We watch only the programs that we already know we like, we watch news that is tailored to our point of view, we order food delivered to our door that we already know we like, and so on. I think this is one of the reasons for the increasing polarisation and radicalisation - if you aren't exposed to other points of view then you won't understand them, and if you don't understand why someone has a different opinion, you are far less likely to be tolerant of them. Eventually you get to the situation where someone who holds the opposite opinion is regarded as being unreasonable, or worse.

Brexit is the epitome of this. We have become divided into two camps, each seemingly incapable of understanding the other, or even wanting to understand the other, and increasingly intolerant of each other. I have come to despair of intelligent people who think the same way as I do, yet are unable to accept any questioning of some of their more outlandish statements. If you dare to question anything they say, then you are treated as a "traitor to the cause".

Brexit is by no means the only example. It is becoming increasingly common for students to ban speakers who hold "unacceptable" views from debates, for example.

It is unhealthy for us as individuals to behave as ostriches, living in our own little bubbles. We need to be challenged, to experience things outside our comfort zones.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
8,185
R/e licencing, I often watch live youtube streams from anything such as a train driver showing his journey live, to a curling match which may be on (for eg) Canadian TV live and streamed here on youtube. If I don't have a TV licence, but was casting those streams; would I be breaking the law?

Personally I reckon it would be better these days if the BBC was a mixture of subscription and government-funded and then there's none of this out-of-date licencing argument. Maybe if BBC Sport had a sub then they could get bigger events that are now on satellite? However it's drifting OT, but if the licence is a means of keeping BBC news and current affairs "neutral" it appears to be failing.
 

Ken H

On Moderation
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,308
Location
N Yorks
I rarely watch live TV. Most of what I watch is recorded, or catch-up. I can then watch what I want when I want, depending on my mood at the time, rather than what is scheduled at that time. This is undoubtedly an improvement, and I chafe when watching live TV. However, the downside I have come to find with this method of viewing is that you tend to get locked into a pattern of viewing, and don't realise that there are other things that you might enjoy in the same way as watching live TV, when you can stumble across something by accident. The players will recommend things for you to watch, based on what you have watched before. Just like the news feeds that tailor themselves to your preferences, your range is subtly limited.

I do worry that we are increasingly living in our own little bubbles. Technology that has undoubtedly expanded our horizons, is now subtly limiting them. We watch only the programs that we already know we like, we watch news that is tailored to our point of view, we order food delivered to our door that we already know we like, and so on. I think this is one of the reasons for the increasing polarisation and radicalisation - if you aren't exposed to other points of view then you won't understand them, and if you don't understand why someone has a different opinion, you are far less likely to be tolerant of them. Eventually you get to the situation where someone who holds the opposite opinion is regarded as being unreasonable, or worse.

Brexit is the epitome of this. We have become divided into two camps, each seemingly incapable of understanding the other, or even wanting to understand the other, and increasingly intolerant of each other. I have come to despair of intelligent people who think the same way as I do, yet are unable to accept any questioning of some of their more outlandish statements. If you dare to question anything they say, then you are treated as a "traitor to the cause".

Brexit is by no means the only example. It is becoming increasingly common for students to ban speakers who hold "unacceptable" views from debates, for example.

It is unhealthy for us as individuals to behave as ostriches, living in our own little bubbles. We need to be challenged, to experience things outside our comfort zones.

Which is why the off topic bit here is good. We are chucked together on Railukforums by our interest in rail but have wildly diverging opinions on other matters.
 

HH

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2009
Messages
4,505
Location
Essex
I do worry that we are increasingly living in our own little bubbles. Technology that has undoubtedly expanded our horizons, is now subtly limiting them. We watch only the programs that we already know we like, we watch news that is tailored to our point of view, we order food delivered to our door that we already know we like, and so on. I think this is one of the reasons for the increasing polarisation and radicalisation - if you aren't exposed to other points of view then you won't understand them, and if you don't understand why someone has a different opinion, you are far less likely to be tolerant of them. Eventually you get to the situation where someone who holds the opposite opinion is regarded as being unreasonable, or worse.
This is definitely happening, but it doesn't have to happen. I actively search for programmes (I presume you mean these and not programs) on all channels/streams, so I'm not limited by what some algorithm wants to show me. Equally, I never get food delivered to my door and actively seek new foods to try.

On an similar theme, I have noticed that some older family members on Facebook are very prone to spreading 'fake news' scare stories - you know the ones which say don't do X or you could lose/get Y. Ones that are always easily exposed by a quick Google search, but it seems that people would rather just pass on the scare story, rather than check it - probably because it accords with their view of the world.
 

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
1,650
ITN used to be on a par with BBC news, but unfortunately the cuts have taken their toll. The last straw was a major news story a few years back when the BBC had reporters on the ground, but ITN were reliant solely on public twitter feeds! In contrast to the BBC's view of news as an integral and important part of their reason for existence, the commercial channels' view of news as a necessary evil is plainly obvious, evidenced by the way ITV has repeatedly shunted the News at Ten around, and the steady erosion of their local newsrooms. I have tried to watch Sky news, but their constant need to sell themselves I find just too annoying. Channel 4's News at seven is the only commercial news worth watching nowadays.

I do get annoyed by news items where the only thing new about it is that they are running a documentary on the subject later that night. ITV started this, but all the channels are now guilty of it.

It is instructive to read Private Eye's take on the news, and how the press are used for their owner's ends (e.g. the Eve Standard's shameless plugging of London Live, that just happens to have the same owner, the double-standards of what The Mail says in print and on-line, etc etc).

I have noticed that some older family members on Facebook are very prone to spreading 'fake news' scare stories - you know the ones which say don't do X or you could lose/get Y.
Not just older family members - the Momo warnings, Lisbon treaty scare stories, etc.
 

underbank

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2013
Messages
1,486
Location
North West England
I've switched to Sky. I found BBC is so dumbed-down and "sleb-centric" to be virtually pointless. The only new I watch is Breakfast news, and the BBC Breakfast offering is frankly pathetic.
 

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
7,343
At daytime, I listen to news on Radio - usually R4, sometimes on local radio. At night, if I watch news, it is usually on BBC1; very occasionally I watch ITV3 or C4 news, but I prefer to avoid the adverts. I know they need ads to pay for their existence, but do they have to be so naff & irritating ? Worst of all are those where some loudmouthed wally yells at me whilst pretending to be an animal. Such ads tend to make me think that the product they are trying to sell is something best avoided.
 

GaryMcEwan

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2013
Messages
1,604
Location
Bridgeton, Glasgow
For local news, without fail its always STV News. Thankfully they haven't gone down the route like the ITV regions and merged the regions into 'Super Regions'.
 

Con

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2012
Messages
75
Location
Co. Donegal
BBC and Ireland’s RTÉ. I used to listen to the Today programme on the radio in the morning but have given up and listen to Radio 3 instead. Haven’t watched Question Time since 2016 as it is a haven now for invincible idiots.
 

pieguyrob

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2018
Messages
571
As has been mentioned, how about a vote for radio news. I rarely watch T.V..
I listen to either B.B.C. Radio 2, or, Smooth in my taxi. And, I listen to Absolute radio '90's at home on D.A.B. radio.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,306
Location
Fenny Stratford
This assumes that the British government has as much control over the BBC as the Kremlin does over RT.

Indeed, but the kind of conspiracy nut who thinks RT is an impartial broadcaster is the type of conspiracy nut who thinks the BBC is controlled from number 10! Oddly many of them support Corbyn.

ITN used to be on a par with BBC news, but unfortunately the cuts have taken their toll.

Agreed - ITN used to be a very serious news service. Now it is bobbins.
 

AntoniC

Member
Joined
28 Dec 2011
Messages
866
Location
Southport
I dont tend to watch TV News (unless its something really big) , I tend to get my news from Radio 5 Live
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
Agreed - ITN used to be a very serious news service. Now it is bobbins.
ITN provides news services to ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5. All different audiences and thus very different programmes.

I'd argue that ITN's Channel 4 News is up there with the very best of TV journalism. But I'd agree that ITV News (which used to be known simply as ITN News) is a shadow of its former self - but that's what ITV plc want and, presumably, they know their audience.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,895
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
ITN provides news services to ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5. All different audiences and thus very different programmes.

I'd argue that ITN's Channel 4 News is up there with the very best of TV journalism. But I'd agree that ITV News (which used to be known simply as ITN News) is a shadow of its former self - but that's what ITV plc want and, presumably, they know their audience.

I haven't watched the ITV in years, it's all tabloid dross, news and general programming. BBC and C4 for me, and sometimes C5.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top