• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New trains for East Midlands Franchise

Status
Not open for further replies.

lammergeier

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2017
Messages
506
May also be a reference to the proposed Syston-Wigston Capacity Scheme which was due to happen in CP6, involving 4-tracking, new platforms at Leicester and grade separated junction at Wigston

I'm not sure if this is definitely going ahead? Whereas I understand the Northbound linespeed improvements will be going ahead, and hopefully soon.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

londonmidland

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2009
Messages
1,833
Location
Leicester
If using platform 3 Southbound it is 40mph throughout for both passenger and freight so significantly better than the previous 15mph dawdle. Also worth pointing out that the Southbound departures from platforms 1 and 4 have also seen modest linespeed increases (up to 25mph) although this does mean the XC services clear the station and associated junctions quicker. Not sure what the exact plan is for Northbound, hopefully a similar 40mph arrival for platform 2.

On the approach to Leicester platform 3 there is a line-side speed sign displaying 40 on top with a line in the middle and 25 at the bottom, or something like that.

Freight certainly does not pass through or accelerate to 40mph through Leicester platform 3, it idles at 25mph whilst passing through.
 

Mariner16

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2018
Messages
106
Location
No
Until the new trains actually arrive there are interim posters that have been displayed.

View attachment 66815 View attachment 66816

Caterer talking to the guard on 156410 today they were saying that East Midlands Railway had plans to put 153s in the middle of 156s a la Scotrail plans because the 170s will not arrive for a while. I think that’ll look disgustingly messy. Especially as 153s are plug door and 156s are pocket sliding door.

Also according to the guard, LNER carriages will be coming to replace East Midlands Trains ones.

Until the new trains actually arrive there are interim posters that have been displayed.

View attachment 66815 View attachment 66816

Caterer talking to the guard on 156410 today they were saying that East Midlands Railway had plans to put 153s in the middle of 156s a la Scotrail plans because the 170s will not arrive for a while. I think that’ll look disgustingly messy. Especially as 153s are plug door and 156s are pocket sliding door.

Also according to the guard, LNER carriages will be coming to replace East Midlands Trains ones.

The 158 exterior with rebrand
 

Attachments

  • 20190807_111157.jpg
    20190807_111157.jpg
    3 MB · Views: 223

lammergeier

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2017
Messages
506
On the approach to Leicester platform 3 there is a line-side speed sign displaying 40 on top with a line in the middle and 25 at the bottom, or something like that.

Freight certainly does not pass through or accelerate to 40mph through Leicester platform 3, it idles at 25mph whilst passing through.

Happy to stand corrected.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,928
Location
Nottingham
On the approach to Leicester platform 3 there is a line-side speed sign displaying 40 on top with a line in the middle and 25 at the bottom, or something like that.

Freight certainly does not pass through or accelerate to 40mph through Leicester platform 3, it idles at 25mph whilst passing through.
That's a differential speed restriction and (with a few rather esoteric exceptions) means passenger trains can do 40mph but freight has to do 25.
 

DogsOnTrains

Member
Joined
6 Aug 2019
Messages
5
Has a timescale been announced for receiving the new bimodes? I wonder what the legal/political implications of running non compliant stock are
 

krus_aragon

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Messages
6,045
Location
North Wales
Has a timescale been announced for receiving the new bimodes? I wonder what the legal/political implications of running non compliant stock are
The legal implications are a need for a derogation, courtesy of the Transport Secretary. Given that they'll have signed off on the new franchise, they shouldn't be caught off-guard.
 

kevjs

Member
Joined
4 Sep 2013
Messages
402
The legal implications are a need for a derogation, courtesy of the Transport Secretary. Given that they'll have signed off on the new franchise, they shouldn't be caught off-guard.
Who was Transport Secretary at the time? Knowing his level of competence he's arranged the derogation period to run from 2022....
 

Mitchell Hurd

On Moderation
Joined
28 Oct 2017
Messages
1,647
I understand that LNER carriages will come to replace the EMT ones (so I guess Mark 4's).

Assuming they are Mark 4's, that will mean the HST power cars will need to have their 2,250hp engines uprated. In a rail magazine or online, I think MAN offered to update the Paxman VP185 engines from 2,250 to 2,400hp to work with Mark 4 coaches.

Also, 5 Class 170's from Scotrail won't be enough to provide a more modern regional fleet. I'm guessing more 170's from West Midlands Railway will happen when they become available.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
I understand that LNER carriages will come to replace the EMT ones (so I guess Mark 4's).

Assuming they are Mark 4's, that will mean the HST power cars will need to have their 2,250hp engines uprated. In a rail magazine or online, I think MAN offered to update the Paxman VP185 engines from 2,250 to 2,400hp to work with Mark 4 coaches.

Firstly we shouldn't assume which carriages they will be as I'm sure you're aware of what Assume really means... ;)

Secondly, the HST pwer cars will need more work then simply having their engines uprated as they currently run 3-phase 415/240 V (Mark 3) power supply for the Mk3s so would they not need this to be upgraded?

Thirdly, the most important issue that you seem to have overlooked is the fact that Mk4s need to be gauge cleared for the MML, the MK3s however don't need this as they already run over the route.

I understand that LNER carriages will come to replace the EMT ones (so I guess Mark 4's).

Also, 5 Class 170's from Scotrail won't be enough to provide a more modern regional fleet. I'm guessing more 170's from West Midlands Railway will happen when they become available.

Again, nobody knows where these extra 170s are coming from but the West Midlands has been mentioned as one possible area.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,928
Location
Nottingham
I understand that LNER carriages will come to replace the EMT ones (so I guess Mark 4's).

Assuming they are Mark 4's, that will mean the HST power cars will need to have their 2,250hp engines uprated. In a rail magazine or online, I think MAN offered to update the Paxman VP185 engines from 2,250 to 2,400hp to work with Mark 4 coaches.
LNER coaches could refer to some from their HSTs, which are to be replaced soon by Azumas and may be closer to accessibilty compliance than the EMT ones.

I would guess uprating the engines is more trouble than it's worth. The cooling on HSTs has always been a bit marginal and more power means more heat to get rid of. If someone is really looking at running Mk4s with HST power cars and the extra weight is really too much to sustain timings, then just leave out one first class coach.
 

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,202
From readang an old PRM spreadsheet some time ago, the ECML MK3s are indeed closer to meeting compliance than the MML ones, but then so are the GWR ones and they're available now.
 

EE Andy b1

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2013
Messages
1,212
Location
CLC
Well surely HSTs with Mk3s makes scense as they already use these, no training required and there are now plenty available.
It's going to be 2-3 years before new 800s are ready, that was why i suggested what i did in post #1454.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,438
The legal implications are a need for a derogation, courtesy of the Transport Secretary. Given that they'll have signed off on the new franchise, they shouldn't be caught off-guard.
AIUI the Transport Secretary can only grant dispensations, and derogations are a matter for the European Commision.
I believe many of the recent posts (across the forums) that mention the possibility of DfT derogations are not strictly accurate.
 

krus_aragon

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Messages
6,045
Location
North Wales
AIUI the Transport Secretary can only grant dispensations, and derogations are a matter for the European Commision.
I believe many of the recent posts (across the forums) that mention the possibility of DfT derogations are not strictly accurate.
Granted, a dispensation would be the appropriate term in this instance. (Though the SoS is still involved in derogations, as they have to notify the EU Comission of any derogations made by the "Competent Authority" , which happens to be Secretary of State. See https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2011/3066/regulation/14/made)
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
From readang an old PRM spreadsheet some time ago, the ECML MK3s are indeed closer to meeting compliance than the MML ones, but then so are the GWR ones and they're available now.

Don't the GWR mk3s lack CET? (toilet tanks)
 

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,202
I don't believe any of them have CETs other than those also fitted with automatic doors, but I could be wrong.
 

cnjb8

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2019
Messages
2,127
Location
Nottingham
I don't believe any of them have CETs other than those also fitted with automatic doors, but I could be wrong.
I think on Wikipedia it says they will be fitted to the Castle sets. I will be corrected if needs be.
Do you think we will see a EMR livered train on the launch day (maybe even before)?
 

EE Andy b1

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2013
Messages
1,212
Location
CLC
I don't believe any of them have CETs other than those also fitted with automatic doors, but I could be wrong.

Your not wrong. Just Castle, 7Cities & refurbished XC sets are fully compliant, but taking forever to do.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
Are the 360s being reliveried as part of their refit do we think? It'll be amusing to see them carrying the base of the livery from three, sort of four TOCs ago if they don't...
 

dosxuk

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
1,765
Are the 360s being reliveried as part of their refit do we think? It'll be amusing to see them carrying the base of the livery from three, sort of four TOCs ago if they don't...

Well EMT launched with some of the 158's showing the liveries of three or four TOCs at once, so the precedent is there!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top