• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

It's an ill wind ... (Jet Stream helps set new transatlantic flight record)

Status
Not open for further replies.

DaleCooper

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2015
Messages
3,513
Location
Mulholland Drive
825mph in a 747!

Storm Ciara helps plane beat transatlantic flight record

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-51433720
Experts are hailing a British Airways flight as the fastest subsonic New York to London journey.

The Boeing 747-436 reached speeds of 825 mph (1,327 km/h) as it rode a jet stream accelerated by Storm Ciara.

The four hours and 56 minutes flight arrived at Heathrow Airport 80 minutes ahead of schedule on Sunday morning.

According to Flightradar24, an online flight tracking service, it beat a previous five hours 13 minutes record held by Norwegian.

The BBC has been unable to independently verify the record as no complete database of flight times was available.

Aviation consultant and former BA pilot Alastair Rosenschein said the aeroplane reached a "phenomenal speed".
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,830
Location
Scotland
Unbelievable especially as it is a very heavy plane - the mighty queen of the skies Boeing 747
The mass really doesn't make a difference. The plane was flying at its normal speed, it just so happened that the air around it was also moving in the same direction.

Some westbound flights have been cancelled because the flight times would have been extended by just as much - so a 8 hour flight might end up being closer to 12.
 

87 027

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2010
Messages
699
Location
London
A very good example of the difference between "groundspeed" and "airspeed", which I never fully understood until recently
 

306024

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2013
Messages
3,946
Location
East Anglia
Unbelievable especially as it is a very heavy plane - the mighty queen of the skies Boeing 747

“The queen of the skies” is exactly how my BA pilot welcomed us on a 747 last month.
Looking at some other footage of planes landing today I’d rather be on the ground though.
 
Last edited:

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
8,150
Location
SE London
Some westbound flights have been cancelled because the flight times would have been extended by just as much - so a 8 hour flight might end up being closer to 12.

Would they? I thought that they took different routes heading East and West so they could match up with the airflows that tended to help, rather than hinder, their ground speed.

(Or perhaps today there weren't any good routes that didn't have ultra-strong winds from the West?)
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,830
Location
Scotland
Would they? I thought that they took different routes heading East and West so they could match up with the airflows that tended to help, rather than hinder, their ground speed.

(Or perhaps today there weren't any good routes that didn't have ultra-strong winds from the West?)
They would have had to go a *long* way out of the normal routes. It would have added at least a couple hours to the flight times. And that's after fighting the winds to get out of UK airspace.
 

STEVIEBOY1

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2010
Messages
4,001
I thought it was a 767 that did that quick flight, I am sure that's what the radio news said, then I heard that it was a 747. As mentioned above however, a great aircraft. I thought though that BA has stopped flying them, nice to hear that they are still around. Out of interest, I wonder how many they have in their fleet.? I wonder what the landing was like though, I am only 5 miles from Heathrow and it was very windy here at times yesterday. I did also hear from a friend that is interested in aviation, that one A380, tried to land at Heathrow, changed it's mind and went for Gatwick, didn't like that so attempted Stansted which was iffy too and ended up at Amsterdam.!
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,830
Location
Scotland
I thought though that BA has stopped flying them, nice to hear that they are still around. Out of interest, I wonder how many they have in their fleet.?
I think they've still got around 30. They aren't leaving the fleet until 2025 or thereabouts - I haven't kept up with the plans as they have changed a few times.
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
9,739
Location
Baildon, West Yorkshire
I think they've still got around 30. They aren't leaving the fleet until 2025 or thereabouts - I haven't kept up with the plans as they have changed a few times.

32 to be precise, with the last one expected to leave service in 2024 and replaced by the new 777-9x, assuming of course Boeing don't run into any more issues.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Airways#Fleet
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,830
Location
Scotland
...replaced by the new 777-9x, assuming of course Boeing don't run into any more issues.
They already have. First flight was delayed by several months, and apparently they have run into some software issues similar to the 737-Max 8. EIS was supposed to have been last year, now it's looking like 2021.
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
9,739
Location
Baildon, West Yorkshire
They already have. First flight was delayed by several months, and apparently they have run into some software issues similar to the 737-Max 8. EIS was supposed to have been last year, now it's looking like 2021.

That's true, I'd totally forgotten about that even though I did watch the live stream of it's first test flight! Doh! :oops:
 

STEVIEBOY1

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2010
Messages
4,001
I think they've still got around 30. They aren't leaving the fleet until 2025 or thereabouts - I haven't kept up with the plans as they have changed a few times.

Oh right, good to know that. Thanks. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top