3973EXL
Established Member
- Joined
- 2 Feb 2017
- Messages
- 2,741
I’d rather it got done than money was spent on designing ‘pretty’ OHLE. There isn’t the money to make it look good’s and even if there was imo it shouldn’t be wasted here.It’s great to see it getting done but……did they say
”here’s the spec, make it as ugly as possible!”
Presumably the advantages for inspection, maintenance, and repair of having one design for the entire area was judged to be worth it.I’m surprised Series 2 or another less ‘heavy looking’ OLE installation wasn’t used here, seeing as high speed, high frequency working isn’t the focus here?
Exactly. Just do it.I’d rather it got done than money was spent on designing ‘pretty’ OHLE. There isn’t the money to make it look good’s and even if there was imo it shouldn’t be wasted here.
Fabulous newsStill on course for switch on Xmas.
A big drawback with lattice designs is the increased likelihood of finding a poor-quality weld.Good design is both functional and economic. This isn't that bad; what could be improved is the horizontal beams having a lighter, trussed, lattice construction rather than the crude, heavier (probably weaker) rectangular form. A further improvement would be a latticed bracket rather than the heavy clamp on the side of a too-tall post, which would have the installation benefit of a single operation to erect a mast/beam. The mast heights are quite uniform here, so neater than the chaotic, random installations of the GWEP. The above suggestions are only based on what is being done elsewhere.
Good design usually looks good.
WAO
Reactangular grids have shorter weld lengths. Are there any instances of lattices falling apart? Why are they still used?A big drawback with lattice designs is the increased likelihood of finding a poor-quality weld.
No instances of collapse AFAIK, but I believe they probably aren't considered for coastal environments due to the corrosion risk from salt water.Reactangular grids have shorter weld lengths. Are there any instances of lattices falling apart? Why are they still used?
WAO
The design uses UKMS100 with F+F SICs and RESICs. Some steelwork and foundations are from Series 1.It's pretty bog-standard Series 1 like everything else west of Airport Jn.
Commonality with the equipment presently used on the GWML.Presumably the advantages for inspection, maintenance, and repair of having one design for the entire area was judged to be worth it.
Series 2 is not a OLE Basic Design Range which is approved for new electrification schemes - UKMS is.I’m surprised Series 2 or another less ‘heavy looking’ OLE installation wasn’t used here, seeing as high speed, high frequency working isn’t the focus here?
It's a very efficient and elegant design that maximises standardisation and constructability. No one will be in a hurry to use welded angle masts and booms.Good design is both functional and economic. This isn't that bad; what could be improved is the horizontal beams having a lighter, trussed, lattice construction rather than the crude, heavier (probably weaker) rectangular form. A further improvement would be a latticed bracket rather than the heavy clamp on the side of a too-tall post, which would have the installation benefit of a single operation to erect a mast/beam. The mast heights are quite uniform here, so neater than the chaotic, random installations of the GWEP. The above suggestions are only based on what is being done elsewhere.
Good design usually looks good.
WAO
Nothing wrong with the above - there are at least some solid steel sections there. It's more the Mk1 welded 4-angle TTC & portal sections that suffer, along with (and to a lesser extent) the Mk3 4-angle TTCs and portals.![]()
Work To Electrify Railway Makes Rapid Progress
Work to electrify the railway to Market Harborough is progressing at pace. Over 100 masts, which will support the overhead cables, have already been installed at the side of tracks, including on the approach to the town’s station. The £350m project by Network Rail, which began in full in Dharboroughfm.co.uk
Curious to know what's wrong with the above images. Sorry to labour the point.
WAO
A little birdy told me this...
You know that silly piece of track between Acton Main Line and Acton Wells Junction that's currently being electrified, which should have *really* been done at the very beginning of the GWML project (don't go there).
Apparently ROG 93s are being assessed for use on the Hanwell Bridge 'trip' stone trains to Dagenham, Purfleet and Harlow.
A 59/66 will bring the huge 4,000t jumbo trains to Hanwell, where they are split into 2 or 3 smaller trains and a 93 will 'trip' the rakes to Essex.
Hanwell Bridge Loop - GWML - Acton Wells - NLL - GOBLIN - LTS.
Whole route from West London to Essex will be electrified except Hanwell Bridge Loop and Stone Terminals where diesel mode is only required at low speeds.
The Tensorex drums contain a flat coil spring. The best explanation of what goes on internally is probably by watching a manufacturer’s video. One of the major advantages is that the two units, one for the catenary and one for the contact wire, can usually be mounted vertically above the track. So there’s no need for the wire runs to head off at an angle to a weight system mounted away from the track, this also has a greater benefit on four track sections:Can someone please explain the difference between traditional pulleys and tensorex drums to me?
Guessing it’s a more modern (more efficient and safer?) way of tensioning the OLE… but what’s the actual mechanism behind it?
Superb link. Greatly appreciated.The Tensorex drums contain a flat coil spring. The best explanation of what goes on internally is probably by watching a manufacturer’s video. One of the major advantages is that the two units, one for the catenary and one for the contact wire, can usually be mounted vertically above the track. So there’s no need for the wire runs to head off at an angle to a weight system mounted away from the track, this also has a greater benefit on four track sections:
(Video includes animations of Tensorex unit operation.)
And you end up with fewer wire runs overall because the "used" section of each run is longer.The Tensorex drums contain a flat coil spring. The best explanation of what goes on internally is probably by watching a manufacturer’s video. One of the major advantages is that the two units, one for the catenary and one for the contact wire, can usually be mounted vertically above the track. So there’s no need for the wire runs to head off at an angle to a weight system mounted away from the track, this also has a greater benefit on four track sections:
(Video includes animations of Tensorex unit operation.)
Which is great until you need to replace the contact wire and the wire run extends over a junctionAnd you end up with fewer wire runs overall because the "used" section of each run is longer.