• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Time for York to come in from the cold and join WY Metro

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
4,981
Location
The Fens
Well, of course residents of those areas did have Network SouthEast in their corner, developing useful products such as travel cards and network cards in conjunction with London, so those areas do perhaps illustrate that "cross border" cooperation can work.
This is incorrect. Network SouthEast was a British Rail operation which grew out of the London and South East sector formed as part of sectorisation in the early 1980s. Network SouthEast didn't do anything "in conjunction with London", and there was no "cross border co-operation".

What happened in London at that time was different, and instructive. The Greater London Council introduced "Fares Fair" in 1981, which subsidised London Underground fares. It was successfully overturned in the courts by Bromley Borough Council, which did not have any London Underground within its area. One local authority going to court to get a policy of another ruled unlawful is completely the opposite to "cross border co-operation".

The Greater London Council was abolished in 1986 and, when Network SouthEast was launched in June 1986, London had no city wide government with which Network SouthEast could work "in conjunction with London".

The limited Capitalcard for season ticket holders pre-dates Network SouthEast. It was introduced in 1985, following negotiations between BR and the Department of Transport.

Travelcards and Network cards came later, in 1989. These were BR initiatives with no local government involvement, though Chris Green and his team at Network SouthEast probably had some work to do to persuade the Department of Transport.

The details are in Chris Green's book, The Network SouthEast Story.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,701
Location
Yorks
This is incorrect. Network SouthEast was a British Rail operation which grew out of the London and South East sector formed as part of sectorisation in the early 1980s. Network SouthEast didn't do anything "in conjunction with London", and there was no "cross border co-operation".

What happened in London at that time was different, and instructive. The Greater London Council introduced "Fares Fair" in 1981, which subsidised London Underground fares. It was successfully overturned in the courts by Bromley Borough Council, which did not have any London Underground within its area. One local authority going to court to get a policy of another ruled unlawful is completely the opposite to "cross border co-operation".

The Greater London Council was abolished in 1986 and, when Network SouthEast was launched in June 1986, London had no city wide government with which Network SouthEast could work "in conjunction with London".

The limited Capitalcard for season ticket holders pre-dates Network SouthEast. It was introduced in 1985, following negotiations between BR and the Department of Transport.

Travelcards and Network cards came later, in 1989. These were BR initiatives with no local government involvement, though Chris Green and his team at Network SouthEast probably had some work to do to persuade the Department of Transport.

The details are in Chris Green's book, The Network SouthEast Story.

I never said that NSE wasn't a BR initiative.

The point I was trying to make is that its perfectly possible to have public transport regional organisations and products that go beyond political boundaries, even in London and its disparate band of surrounding counties.

There is no good reason why York can't take an active part in the Metro area, regardless of whether it is part of WYCA or not.
 

RT4038

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2014
Messages
4,869
There is no good reason why York can't take an active part in the Metro area, regardless of whether it is part of WYCA or not.
It is only possible if York has the fund raising powers to be able to afford taking an active part in the Metro area, which currently it does not. Even if it did, it would need the good Burghers to approve of the funds being raised and used in this way. (or for existing expenditure to be diverted, but this seems a highly unlikely scenario given Local Authority finances).

Other than that, there is no good reason.
 

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
4,981
Location
The Fens
There is no good reason why York can't take an active part in the Metro area, regardless of whether it is part of WYCA or not.
The West Yorkshire Metro is a West Yorkshire Combined Authority thing, whereas Network SouthEast was a railway thing. They are fundamentally different. York can only take part in the West Yorkshire Metro area with the agreement of the West Yorkshire mayor.

It is only possible if York has the fund raising powers to be able to afford taking an active part in the Metro area, which currently it does not. Even if it did, it would need the good Burghers to approve of the funds being raised and used in this way. (or for existing expenditure to be diverted, but this seems a highly unlikely scenario given Local Authority finances).
It would also require the York and North Yorkshire mayor to negotiate a funding agreement with the West Yorkshire mayor.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I never said that NSE wasn't a BR initiative.

The point I was trying to make is that its perfectly possible to have public transport regional organisations and products that go beyond political boundaries, even in London and its disparate band of surrounding counties.
It was because NSE was a BR initiative, without local government involvement, that it was able to go beyond local government boundaries. If NSE had needed to be negotiated with 32 London boroughs and (I think) 18 counties, it would never have happened.
 
Last edited:

RT4038

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2014
Messages
4,869
It would also require the York and North Yorkshire mayor to negotiate a funding agreement with the West Yorkshire mayor.
Well quite - I am sure the West Yorkshire Mayor would agree provided it is cost neutral. However, that means the good burghers of York would need to fund not only their cheaper fares but also those of the residents of West Yorkshire wishing to visit York. Perhaps the likelihood is getting smaller and smaller......?
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
2,253
Location
Leeds
I think I read that in the 1970s boundary change proposals that Harrogate also probably Ripon was originally to be placed within Leeds MBC therefore West Yorks then this was subsequently dropped then the Harrogate area got transferred from the old West Riding into the newly created North Yorkshire.
I mentioned that earlier. It was the Redcliffe-Maud report - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redcliffe-Maud_Report (which also has a map).

Perhaps the dropping of "West Yorkshire" from the brand name might make cross border involvement easier politically.
Slightly off-topic, but it never was in the brand name - certainly, never in the brand guidelines. It arose from a redesign of the website when we went to a content management system, and was one of the bits I couldn't change. The domain name is wymetro, but could easily have been metro-wy. The previous domain name was... ridiculous.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,701
Location
Yorks
The West Yorkshire Metro is a West Yorkshire Combined Authority thing, whereas Network SouthEast was a railway thing. They are fundamentally different. York can only take part in the West Yorkshire Metro area with the agreement of the West Yorkshire mayor.


It would also require the York and North Yorkshire mayor to negotiate a funding agreement with the West Yorkshire mayor.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


It was because NSE was a BR initiative, without local government involvement, that it was able to go beyond local government boundaries. If NSE had needed to be negotiated with 32 London boroughs and (I think) 18 counties, it would never have happened.

I think we're in danger of fixating on the means rather than the ends here.

The point here is that its perfectly possible for "cross border" initiatives to be developed, whoever instigates them.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Well quite - I am sure the West Yorkshire Mayor would agree provided it is cost neutral. However, that means the good burghers of York would need to fund not only their cheaper fares but also those of the residents of West Yorkshire wishing to visit York. Perhaps the likelihood is getting smaller and smaller......?

Well, it seems that York, along with North Yorkshire have a combined authority themselves which can raise funds as any other. They might choose to use some of that funding to extend the WYMetro benefits to their residents. It would be quite pragmatic and sensible.
 

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
4,981
Location
The Fens
The point here is that its perfectly possible for "cross border" initiatives to be developed, whoever instigates them.
Very few initiatives are completely impossible, and very few initiatives are perfectly possible. They all lie on a spectrum somewhere in between. Organisations can instigate what "cross border" initiatives they like, according to their priorities, but delivering what they have instigated is a different matter.

The imperatives that move initiatives towards the perfectly possible end of the spectrum are political and financial, without those any initiative is stuck at the impossible end of the spectrum, just a bit of wishful thinking.

I don't follow local events in Yorkshire that closely, but I don't see anything to suggest that your proposal has the political or financial imperatives that might carry it forward from initiative to delivery. There are lots of initiatives ahead of it in the order of political and financial priority, notably those set out in the recently published Blunkett Report.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,701
Location
Yorks
Very few initiatives are completely impossible, and very few initiatives are perfectly possible. They all lie on a spectrum somewhere in between. Organisations can instigate what "cross border" initiatives they like, according to their priorities, but delivering what they have instigated is a different matter.

The imperatives that move initiatives towards the perfectly possible end of the spectrum are political and financial, without those any initiative is stuck at the impossible end of the spectrum, just a bit of wishful thinking.

I don't follow local events in Yorkshire that closely, but I don't see anything to suggest that your proposal has the political or financial imperatives that might carry it forward from initiative to delivery. There are lots of initiatives ahead of it in the order of political and financial priority, notably those set out in the recently published Blunkett Report.

I must admit, I've only read the summary of the Blunkett report on here, and whilst it contains much to commend it, it seemed to concentrate more on capital improvements, rather than highlighting those products and ticketing innovations that could also play such an important role in making transport easier for passengers
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
2,253
Location
Leeds
I must admit, I've only read the summary of the Blunkett report on here, and whilst it contains much to commend it, it seemed to concentrate more on capital improvements, rather than highlighting those products and ticketing innovations that could also play such an important role in making transport easier for passengers
Exactly. New, faster, more frequent trains and associated infrastructure are great, but not much use if we can't afford to use it. I'd be more impressed if there was something about cross-boundary train (and bus) fares.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,701
Location
Yorks
Exactly. New, faster, more frequent trains and associated infrastructure are great, but not much use if we can't afford to use it. I'd be more impressed if there was something about cross-boundary train (and bus) fares.

Indeed. It would be a "quick win" as well, rather than taking ages to build.
 

IanXC

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
6,508
Exactly. New, faster, more frequent trains and associated infrastructure are great, but not much use if we can't afford to use it. I'd be more impressed if there was something about cross-boundary train (and bus) fares.

I suspect in Yorkshire we're at the point where the suppressed demand will fill capacity for quite some time before the accessibility of products and prices becomes a limiting factor.
 

Bristol LHS

Member
Joined
29 Sep 2020
Messages
101
Location
Yorkshire
They seemed to introduce those 'Zone 6/7' Harrogate/Skipton tickets many years ago and then seem to barely ackowledge them, by the looks you still only have the option of a flimsy paper ticket for them rather than having them loaded onto a phone/MCard (I had the Harrogate one for a 2/3 year period a few years back and must have had to replace 20-30 times a year due to the magnetic strip packing in!)

Also I always felt slightly annoyed that those particular products don't even include bus travel! (I can perhaps forgive North Yorkshire but West Yorkshire would have been nice!)

My memory is that these were introduced (at least on the Harrogate line) to stop the rail heading into Horsforth - people driving from south of Harrogate to Horsforth to take advantage of cheaper WY fares. The hope was to encourage use of Weeton and Pannal instead.
 

geoffk

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,639
Darton is in South Yorkshire, but WYPTE tickets are valid there for travel to/from the West Yorkshire direction.
Denby Dale, South Elmsall and Moorthorpe are in West Yorkshire, but SYPTE tickets are valid there for travel to/from the South Yorkshire direction.

Sadly no similar reciprocal agreement is in place between West Yorkshire and Greater Manchester, hence the relatively high fares for a Marsden to Greenfield journey.
Or Walsden/Todmorden to Littleborough, a journey I used to make regularly.
 

deltic08

On Moderation
Joined
26 Aug 2013
Messages
2,793
Location
North
My memory is that these were introduced (at least on the Harrogate line) to stop the rail heading into Horsforth - people driving from south of Harrogate to Horsforth to take advantage of cheaper WY fares. The hope was to encourage use of Weeton and Pannal instead.
Commuters from north of Harrogate can no longer park at Harrogate, Hornbeam Park, Pannal, Weeton and Horsforth as their car parks are full very early in the day with no room to expand them. Instead they are having to continue into Leeds and park at Kirkstall Forge. Many drive directly to Garforth now knowing that trying to park in Harrogate is futile. Garforth car park is still a problem even after workmen have given up their compound in the car park after completion of the footbridge. This defeats the advantages of using public transport.
That is one reason why Leeds Northern Railway Reinstatement Group is campaigning for reinstatement to Ripon, Wetherby and Pool-in-Wharfedale as additional railheads to add more station car parks. What we have currently is woefully inadequate now and can only get worse as Ripon and Wetherby are rapidly increasing populations.
Wetherby is planned to increase 10 fold and Ripon 5 fold since the decisions were made to close their railways in 1962.
 

stevieinselby

Member
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
755
Location
Selby
Commuters from north of Harrogate can no longer park at Harrogate, Hornbeam Park, Pannal, Weeton and Horsforth as their car parks are full very early in the day with no room to expand them. Instead they are having to continue into Leeds and park at Kirkstall Forge. Many drive directly to Garforth now knowing that trying to park in Harrogate is futile. Garforth car park is still a problem even after workmen have given up their compound in the car park after completion of the footbridge. This defeats the advantages of using public transport.
That is one reason why Leeds Northern Railway Reinstatement Group is campaigning for reinstatement to Ripon, Wetherby and Pool-in-Wharfedale as additional railheads to add more station car parks. What we have currently is woefully inadequate now and can only get worse as Ripon and Wetherby are rapidly increasing populations.
Wetherby is planned to increase 10 fold and Ripon 5 fold since the decisions were made to close their railways in 1962.
Could any of the existing car parks be extended or turned into multi-storey to add more capacity? Or could improvements to local buses (including integrated ticketing) encourage/enable some people to use bus+train instead of driving to the station?
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,701
Location
Yorks
Could any of the existing car parks be extended or turned into multi-storey to add more capacity? Or could improvements to local buses (including integrated ticketing) encourage/enable some people to use bus+train instead of driving to the station?

Or alternatively, just have sensible fares between York, Harrogate etc and West Yorkshire !?
 

bluenoxid

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
2,534
Could any of the existing car parks be extended or turned into multi-storey to add more capacity? Or could improvements to local buses (including integrated ticketing) encourage/enable some people to use bus+train instead of driving to the station?
Hornbeam Park would be your biggest contender for taking an existing surface car park up a few levels but it isn’t the biggest. I’m not sure how popular building on the Harrogate bound side of the line would be. Alternatively, purchasing Victoria car park next to Harrogate station and pushing it upwards would be an option.

The problem for these options is that this is North Yorkshire and supporting residents who are trying to escape and take their economic activity elsewhere causes grinding teeth. Work at both Harrogate and Hornbeam Park puts vehicles on the already busy A61 route through Harrogate town centre.

The options on the table are in West Yorkshire.

Temple Green bus based Park and Ride sits two junctions down from Garforth. It’s ready, open six days a week and has plenty of space for expansion

There’s also land opposite the Grammar School at Leeds on the A61 for a north Leeds bus based Park and Ride. This option is south enough for some drivers to use the Beckwithshaw route round Harrogate rather than push through the centre of Harrogate.

The Leeds-Bradford Airport Parkway includes an option to build a car park accessed off Scotland Lane. My problem with it is that it pushes more traffic from Pool which I understand has been an air pollution black spot.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,701
Location
Yorks
Hornbeam Park would be your biggest contender for taking an existing surface car park up a few levels but it isn’t the biggest. I’m not sure how popular building on the Harrogate bound side of the line would be. Alternatively, purchasing Victoria car park next to Harrogate station and pushing it upwards would be an option.

The problem for these options is that this is North Yorkshire and supporting residents who are trying to escape and take their economic activity elsewhere causes grinding teeth. Work at both Harrogate and Hornbeam Park puts vehicles on the already busy A61 route through Harrogate town centre.

The options on the table are in West Yorkshire.

How ?

Make your money in WYorks and spend it in beautiful York/Harrogate.

NYorks would benefit.
 

bluenoxid

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
2,534
North Yorkshire Council and York City Council wants the business rates, outside of work spending and economic activity in their council area, not in Leeds.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,701
Location
Yorks
North Yorkshire Council and York City Council wants the business rates, outside of work spending and economic activity in their council area, not in Leeds.

Look at York and Harrogate.

They'd probably come out better. They have that beautiful old world charm that West Yorkshire (and our magnificent Victorian buildings which are marvellous as well, but don't recreate the medieval city experience) which we don't.
 

stevieinselby

Member
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
755
Location
Selby
Or alternatively, just have sensible fares between York, Harrogate etc and West Yorkshire !?
That does nothing to answer the problem that "Commuters from north of Harrogate can no longer park at Harrogate, Hornbeam Park, Pannal, Weeton and Horsforth as their car parks are full very early in the day with no room to expand them", as quoted in my post – quite the opposite, there is clearly more demand from those stations in North Yorkshire into Leeds than the current infrastructure can sustain, so if anything the fares are too low... ;)
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,701
Location
Yorks
That does nothing to answer the problem that "Commuters from north of Harrogate can no longer park at Harrogate, Hornbeam Park, Pannal, Weeton and Horsforth as their car parks are full very early in the day with no room to expand them", as quoted in my post – quite the opposite, there is clearly more demand from those stations in North Yorkshire into Leeds than the current infrastructure can sustain, so if anything the fares are too low... ;)

Surely its the car park infrastructure that's inadequate (from your posts,) rather than the rail infrastructure ?

This would presumably be alleviated by people being able to travel from their local station, rather than railheading !
 

stevieinselby

Member
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
755
Location
Selby
Temple Green bus based Park and Ride sits two junctions down from Garforth. It’s ready, open six days a week and has plenty of space for expansion

There’s also land opposite the Grammar School at Leeds on the A61 for a north Leeds bus based Park and Ride. This option is south enough for some drivers to use the Beckwithshaw route round Harrogate rather than push through the centre of Harrogate.

The Leeds-Bradford Airport Parkway includes an option to build a car park accessed off Scotland Lane. My problem with it is that it pushes more traffic from Pool which I understand has been an air pollution black spot.
Temple Green is not going to be appealing to people coming from the north side of Leeds if they've got to drive all the way round to the south-east side, and with buses only running every 20 minutes it's not a convenient service.

Whether it's near GSAL, or possibly the site of the works compound where the new ring road ends near Shadwell, a Park & Ride site serving the northern catchment would be a good thing. Agreed that pushing more traffic through Pool and the dreadful Dyneley Arms junction is not the way to go though, the roads there are badly congested and wouldn't cope with the extra traffic.
 

deltic08

On Moderation
Joined
26 Aug 2013
Messages
2,793
Location
North
Could any of the existing car parks be extended or turned into multi-storey to add more capacity? Or could improvements to local buses (including integrated ticketing) encourage/enable some people to use bus+train instead of driving to the station?
I have already said there is no room for expansion due to adjacent properties. Hornbeam Park station car park is the only one that could be expanded but not owned by Network Rail as it is owned by Hornbeam Park business park.
As an aside, Hornbeam Park station was my idea that I pushed with Harrogate BC in 1986. They finally adopted it and opened it 10 years later with the help of Counncillor Douglas Crowther for £4million. I called it Hookstone Halt.
If you look at the current car parks, I would say no. They are small as it is and a deck on top would be too costly and unsightly in such rural position. When the ramp is added, that would take up most of the ground floor parking space defeating the object of a deck.
The trouble with bus park and ride is that the Ripon to Leeds via A61 is the congestion in Harrogate to reach P&R outside Leeds where congestion can take 60 minutes to get into Leeds
Hornbeam Park would be your biggest contender for taking an existing surface car park up a few levels but it isn’t the biggest. I’m not sure how popular building on the Harrogate bound side of the line would be. Alternatively, purchasing Victoria car park next to Harrogate station and pushing it upwards would be an option.

The problem for these options is that this is North Yorkshire and supporting residents who are trying to escape and take their economic activity elsewhere causes grinding teeth. Work at both Harrogate and Hornbeam Park puts vehicles on the already busy A61 route through Harrogate town centre.

The options on the table are in West Yorkshire.

Temple Green bus based Park and Ride sits two junctions down from Garforth. It’s ready, open six days a week and has plenty of space for expansion

There’s also land opposite the Grammar School at Leeds on the A61 for a north Leeds bus based Park and Ride. This option is south enough for some drivers to use the Beckwithshaw route round Harrogate rather than push through the centre of Harrogate.

The Leeds-Bradford Airport Parkway includes an option to build a car park accessed off Scotland Lane. My problem with it is that it pushes more traffic from Pool which I understand has been an air pollution black spot.
A car park on the Harrogate bound Hornbeam Park platform is a no no. It would mean felling a copse of mature beech trees.
Parking at the proposed Airport Parkway is again not suitable. Land is too far from the station for a car park. It is the highest part of Leeds and subject to wintery weather on a very sloping hillside.
The station is in a very deep cutting with stone walling each side and the south portal of Bramhope tunnel that is adjacent. Both have a preservation order on them
That does nothing to answer the problem that "Commuters from north of Harrogate can no longer park at Harrogate, Hornbeam Park, Pannal, Weeton and Horsforth as their car parks are full very early in the day with no room to expand them", as quoted in my post – quite the opposite, there is clearly more demand from those stations in North Yorkshire into Leeds than the current infrastructure can sustain, so if anything the fares are too low... ;)
Definitely not. You obviously do not live in Harrogate. The Commons Transport Select Committee stated in their 2020 report that fares should not be used to regulate passenger flows on busy routes.
Surely its the car park infrastructure that's inadequate (from your posts,) rather than the rail infrastructure ?

This would presumably be alleviated by people being able to travel from their local station, rather than railheading !
The 2005 JMP study showed that half the commuters from Ripon to Harrogate and Leeds could convert to rail if Ripon was connected to the system. This would be 188,000 annually. With others this would total 0.73million users. This was similar to Skipton at 0.74min 2005. Skipton users to-day is well over a million. So could Ripon have been to-day. That is enough to reinstate Ripon-Harrogate even at to-days costs of £350million. A lot could transfer to rail from Ripon not needing car parks between Harrogate and Leeds.
Temple Green is not going to be appealing to people coming from the north side of Leeds if they've got to drive all the way round to the south-east side, and with buses only running every 20 minutes it's not a convenient service.

Whether it's near GSAL, or possibly the site of the works compound where the new ring road ends near Shadwell, a Park & Ride site serving the northern catchment would be a good thing. Agreed that pushing more traffic through Pool and the dreadful Dyneley Arms junction is not the way to go though, the roads there are badly congested and wouldn't cope with the extra traffic.
Exactly
 

stevieinselby

Member
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
755
Location
Selby
Definitely not. You obviously do not live in Harrogate. The Commons Transport Select Committee stated in their 2020 report that fares should not be used to regulate passenger flows on busy routes.
I wasn't seriously suggesting that we should increase the fares – it was a tongue-in-cheek response to Rob's obsession that fares from North Yorkshire to Leeds are so high that they act as a major deterrent to passengers, when the usage here indicates that that isn't the case.
The 2005 JMP study showed that half the commuters from Ripon to Harrogate and Leeds could convert to rail if Ripon was connected to the system. This would be 188,000 annually. With others this would total 0.73million users. This was similar to Skipton at 0.74min 2005. Skipton users to-day is well over a million. So could Ripon have been to-day. That is enough to reinstate Ripon-Harrogate even at to-days costs of £350million. A lot could transfer to rail from Ripon not needing car parks between Harrogate and Leeds.
Could, or would?
Don't get me wrong, I would like to see services to Ripon reinstated (my preferred option would be an hourly TPX service running through to Newcastle), but we need to be careful about what the studies are showing us – especially if they are based on 20+ year old data.
A key difference between potential services to Ripon and Skipton is frequency – Skipton gets a half-hourly local service plus about one fast train an hour, it's hard to see Ripon getting that level of service, so it's unlikely that it would pull in as high a proportion of potential traffic.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,701
Location
Yorks
I have already said there is no room for expansion due to adjacent properties. Hornbeam Park station car park is the only one that could be expanded but not owned by Network Rail as it is owned by Hornbeam Park business park.
As an aside, Hornbeam Park station was my idea that I pushed with Harrogate BC in 1986. They finally adopted it and opened it 10 years later with the help of Counncillor Douglas Crowther for £4million. I called it Hookstone Halt.
If you look at the current car parks, I would say no. They are small as it is and a deck on top would be too costly and unsightly in such rural position. When the ramp is added, that would take up most of the ground floor parking space defeating the object of a deck.
The trouble with bus park and ride is that the Ripon to Leeds via A61 is the congestion in Harrogate to reach P&R outside Leeds where congestion can take 60 minutes to get into Leeds

A car park on the Harrogate bound Hornbeam Park platform is a no no. It would mean felling a copse of mature beech trees.
Parking at the proposed Airport Parkway is again not suitable. Land is too far from the station for a car park. It is the highest part of Leeds and subject to wintery weather on a very sloping hillside.
The station is in a very deep cutting with stone walling each side and the south portal of Bramhope tunnel that is adjacent. Both have a preservation order on them

Definitely not. You obviously do not live in Harrogate. The Commons Transport Select Committee stated in their 2020 report that fares should not be used to regulate passenger flows on busy routes.

The 2005 JMP study showed that half the commuters from Ripon to Harrogate and Leeds could convert to rail if Ripon was connected to the system. This would be 188,000 annually. With others this would total 0.73million users. This was similar to Skipton at 0.74min 2005. Skipton users to-day is well over a million. So could Ripon have been to-day. That is enough to reinstate Ripon-Harrogate even at to-days costs of £350million. A lot could transfer to rail from Ripon not needing car parks between Harrogate and Leeds.

Exactly

Yes, Ripon would be a good reopening IMO.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,701
Location
Yorks
Next on the list after Skipton-Colne, I believe.

( <D )

That's another one I'd like to see.

I think Ripon might be the more likely to happen, given that its a sizable town stranded off of the network.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I wasn't seriously suggesting that we should increase the fares – it was a tongue-in-cheek response to Rob's obsession that fares from North Yorkshire to Leeds are so high that they act as a major deterrent to passengers, when the usage here indicates that that isn't the case.

Ah, but I suspect that rail usage between NYorks (York in particular) and WYorks probably would be higher if it were included in the Metro basket of products.

I do suspect that the high fares between the two are a bit of a drag on economic activity.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
17,308
Location
Devon
Just a gentle reminder to keep this on topic where possible please.

Thank you!
 

Top