• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Introducing RailUK Tickets - support the forum when booking your rail tickets!

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
3,460
Location
Burgess Hill
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

andythebrave

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2009
Messages
562
Location
In the Marston Vale
Note that it does not say that first class is available on the West Highland services mentioned, merely that there is catering on board.
Later it says that if there is catering on board there is a complimentary first class offer but clearly when there is no first class (as in this case) this isn't relevant.
There is no first class accommodation on the West Highland route, declassified or not.
 

styles

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
751
Location
Midlothian
Note that it does not say that first class is available on the West Highland services mentioned, merely that there is catering on board.
Later it says that if there is catering on board there is a complimentary first class offer but clearly when there is no first class (as in this case) this isn't relevant.
There is no first class accommodation on the West Highland route, declassified or not.
This makes a lot more sense, thanks!

I've gone standard anyway, take my own flask of coffee!
 

talldave

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2013
Messages
2,436
Would I be right in thinking that the Existing Travelcard Held field under More/Advanced Options needs multiple instances, one for each adult/child selected?
 

Mike395

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
3,111
Location
Bedford
Would I be right in thinking that the Existing Travelcard Held field under More/Advanced Options needs multiple instances, one for each adult/child selected?
No, anything you select in the Advanced dialog will apply to all passengers in the search.
 

talldave

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2013
Messages
2,436
No, anything you select in the Advanced dialog will apply to all passengers in the search.
Thanks for the reply. I now understand this is how the site works as it uses the same approach for railcards - applies the same railcard to all passengers. I find that a bit frustrating as a family trip for us would require multiple transactions. It also nudges people towards a "I didn't realise I'd selected 16-25 for everyone in our group" thread in Disputes and Prosecutions!

Sadly, yesterday my enthusiasm to support the site was thwarted as my attempt to quickly purchase 2 Boundary Zone 6 tickets for my son & I just resulted in endless error messages and I had to give up and use Avanti who I cannot praise enough for allowing "Boundary Zone 6" to be simply entered as your starting point.

I tried yesterday evening to recreate the error on the forum's site so that I could provide some constructive feedback but it just wouldn't fail again:(. So I can only assume there was some Edge cache/sulking silliness yesterday morning.
 

Mike395

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
3,111
Location
Bedford
Thanks for the reply. I now understand this is how the site works as it uses the same approach for railcards - applies the same railcard to all passengers. I find that a bit frustrating as a family trip for us would require multiple transactions. It also nudges people towards a "I didn't realise I'd selected 16-25 for everyone in our group" thread in Disputes and Prosecutions!

Sadly, yesterday my enthusiasm to support the site was thwarted as my attempt to quickly purchase 2 Boundary Zone 6 tickets for my son & I just resulted in endless error messages and I had to give up and use Avanti who I cannot praise enough for allowing "Boundary Zone 6" to be simply entered as your starting point.

I tried yesterday evening to recreate the error on the forum's site so that I could provide some constructive feedback but it just wouldn't fail again:(. So I can only assume there was some Edge cache/sulking silliness yesterday morning.
There was a (now-fixed) upstream bug affecting any searches for Travelcard-held fares yesterday morning - so that makes perfect sense in terms of the timescales. You shouldn't have issues hopefully moving forward with similar searches.
 

SickyNicky

Verified Rep - FastJP
Joined
8 Sep 2010
Messages
2,819
Location
Ledbury
There was a (now-fixed) upstream bug affecting any searches for Travelcard-held fares yesterday morning - so that makes perfect sense in terms of the timescales. You shouldn't have issues hopefully moving forward with similar searches.
It was a licence key expiring, with no warning or communication of any sort from the vendor, and despite the bill having been paid properly. We fixed it quite quickly. Suffice to say, we are migrating away from that vendor.
 

SickyNicky

Verified Rep - FastJP
Joined
8 Sep 2010
Messages
2,819
Location
Ledbury
We can faciliate it at our end, but the issue is one of customer service. There would be customers that book at a higher price when a lower one becomes available later. I'm sure the relevant people are watching, if anyone has any ideas.
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
2,478
Location
Bath
We can faciliate it at our end, but the issue is one of customer service. There would be customers that book at a higher price when a lower one becomes available later. I'm sure the relevant people are watching, if anyone has any ideas.
Of course some TOCs have been releasing significantly later than 12 weeks (Looking at GTR), the risk is always there. Perhaps a warning could be put on directing customers to the national rail booking horizon page?
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
73,505
Location
Yorkshire
Of course some TOCs have been releasing significantly later than 12 weeks (Looking at GTR), the risk is always there. Perhaps a warning could be put on directing customers to the national rail booking horizon page?
Would that be sufficient to avoid customer service complaints asking why a journey from (say) Derby to London was routed via Stoke, or something like that, when just a few days later, the direct route is opened for bookings?

Are people likely to realise that this might be the reason for a convoluted route ?

It sounds easy but if you think about it, there are consequences for a decision either way and there is no obvious answer.
 

OscarH

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2020
Messages
909
Location
Crawley
Of course some TOCs have been releasing significantly later than 12 weeks (Looking at GTR), the risk is always there. Perhaps a warning could be put on directing customers to the national rail booking horizon page?
Yes, the non-synchronised booking window is absolutely insane. It's unfortunately too common in many contexts that the TOCs and RDG think that every journey is a single leg on a single TOC, and multi leg/multi TOC journeys are just not considered.

The booking horizon is something on the radar, but it's non-trivial to work out how to handle the warnings
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
20,369
Would that be sufficient to avoid customer service complaints asking why a journey from (say) Derby to London was routed via Stoke, or something like that, when just a few days later, the direct route is opened for bookings?

Are people likely to realise that this might be the reason for a convoluted route ?

It sounds easy but if you think about it, there are consequences for a decision either way and there is no obvious answer.
I suppose the one (poor) consolation is that every single retailer, TOC or independent, has to juggle with the same problem.
 

fandroid

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2014
Messages
1,955
Location
Hampshire
This may have arisen before but I had to think my way around it yesterday. I was looking for split tickets for an Off-Peak return Reading to Bristol Parkway. The site sensibly calls these "semi flexible", presumably as they have time restrictions. Anyway, I was offered a variety of fares, and for direct services, there were basically two offers, one splitting at Didcot (the cheapest) and one splitting at Swindon. I wasn't even sure of the timing of my outward journey, let alone the return one. As I know the route reasonably well, I chose the Swindon split, as that covered all eventualities, as all Parkway-bound trains appear to stop there.

I worked that out, as I had plenty of time to explore, but the usual presentation of the options doesn't make the issue clear. This is not intended as a complaint. I just wonder if there's a way of flagging up the additional limiting of flexibility that some adopted splits impose.
 

Egg Centric

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
1,877
Location
Land of the Prince Bishops
it's non-trivial to work out how to handle the warnings

For the forum site wouldn't it be ok to link to an in depth explanation? I appreciate that the forum site is presumably a small proportion of customers so it might not be worth it, but you could maybe make use of this by presenting users with several different explanations and ask which they preferred. Although again I do appreciate we're going to be atypical in terms of how we process the information. Then again the absolutely most obsessive about saving forum members are probably not going to be using the convenient automated tools but instead quite possibly using an interesting routing and rinsing someone daft enough to give out 10% cashback... so us casuals might be more representative than you think!
 

Adam Williams

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2018
Messages
2,602
Location
Warks
For the forum site wouldn't it be ok to link to an in depth explanation? I appreciate that the forum site is presumably a small proportion of customers so it might not be worth it, but you could maybe make use of this by presenting users with several different explanations and ask which they preferred. Although again I do appreciate we're going to be atypical in terms of how we process the information. Then again the absolutely most obsessive about saving forum members are probably not going to be using the convenient automated tools but instead quite possibly using an interesting routing and rinsing someone daft enough to give out 10% cashback... so us casuals might be more representative than you think!
I don't know if Oscar was just referring to the frontends, but some of it is contractual requirements set by the TOCs as well, to be able to send out warnings to customers affected by set swaps as and when they happen in the reservation system (before go-live).

There's been a bit of engineering work on that, but not enough time has been able to be dedicated to it yet to enable some popular TOCs to have an extended horizon.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
3,460
Location
Burgess Hill
Seems the problem is still outstanding. Not able to purchase any through ticket from South West to South Wales.
Please could you provide a search link (preferably for a few days in the future) for the journey you're looking at and let us know what ticket(s) you'd expect to see?
 

lnerazuma

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2022
Messages
66
Location
London
Please could you provide a search link (preferably for a few days in the future) for the journey you're looking at and let us know what ticket(s) you'd expect to see?


12 June from Westbury to Cardiff Central.

Trainline currently showing £13.3 through advance for 15:59 - 19:31 itinerary with a change in Gloucester, no RRB involved. My preference is to purchase through advance and flexible tickets with itineraries via Gloucester during the engineering work period in Severn tunnel.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
3,460
Location
Burgess Hill

12 June from Westbury to Cardiff Central.

Trainline currently showing £13.3 through advance for 15:59 - 19:31 itinerary with a change in Gloucester, no RRB involved. My preference is to purchase through advance and flexible tickets with itineraries via Gloucester during the engineering work period in Severn tunnel.
We're looking into this, but whatever it is I'm sure it's not likely to be a quick fix.
 

Top