• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 350 on testing for TPE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

anthony263

Established Member
Joined
19 Aug 2008
Messages
6,762
Location
South Wales
Similar seating arrangement to the class 185's I believe.

There is a video on youtube showing what the interiors are likely to be like
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Class377 is right, even after May 2014 timetable they are planning to be putting 185's into some of the busiest weekend services, there frankly isnt enough 350's on order to double up all the required weekend services without supplementing with a couple of 185's though in the week they should be able to cope without the help of 185's.
 
Last edited:

jon91

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2010
Messages
307
Location
Blackburn
Went through Preston today and whilst waiting for my train to ormskirk saw the 350 in question, it departed northwards shortly after I took this shot

9559582122_c93a8137ec_b.jpg
 

Aldaniti

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2009
Messages
668
Yes. All brand new 4-car 350s (with an "intercity-style" layout, whatever that actually means).

If the new units are going to have one third two third doors then they won't be Intercity style trains whatever the internal set up. If they are to be like the SWT 444 units, with doors at the end of the carriage, then there's hope for improvement on the 185s which are highly unsuitable for the WCML services that they operate.
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
9,992
They're just going to be 350s, with doors the same as the rest
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,135
Location
Mold, Clwyd
If the new units are going to have one third two third doors then they won't be Intercity style trains whatever the internal set up.

Having end gangways also disqualifies them as inter-city stock for me.
I think they mean seating layout (2x2 and reasonable knee room).
The current 350/1s are nice trains overall though.
Unlike 185s they are very quiet without the noise and vibration from those pesky underfloor diesels.
By comparison the 350/2s are horrid, cramped trains with a metro ambience, despite being identical dynamically.
LM seem to delight in putting unsuitable 350/2s on Birmingham-Liverpool services rather than 350/1s.
At least TPE can't do that on Manchester-Scotland (and they will have a trolley, something else LM got rid of).
 

Aldaniti

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2009
Messages
668
Having end gangways also disqualifies them as inter-city stock for me.
I think they mean seating layout (2x2 and reasonable knee room).
The current 350/1s are nice trains overall though.
Unlike 185s they are very quiet without the noise and vibration from those pesky underfloor diesels.
By comparison the 350/2s are horrid, cramped trains with a metro ambience, despite being identical dynamically.
LM seem to delight in putting unsuitable 350/2s on Birmingham-Liverpool services rather than 350/1s.
At least TPE can't do that on Manchester-Scotland (and they will have a trolley, something else LM got rid of).

I very much agree and I agree that the 350/1 units are decent enough trains - on a route such as Euston to Rugby (or Birmingham at a push), but they're just not suitable for Manchester - Glasgow/Edinburgh. Its a shame that an AC version of the 444 wasn't specified. Much as I tend to dislike Virgin stock they at least feel like an Intercity train and I'll be sticking with them on my future journeys to Scotland!
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
I very much agree and I agree that the 350/1 units are decent enough trains - on a route such as Euston to Rugby (or Birmingham at a push), but they're just not suitable for Manchester - Glasgow/Edinburgh. Its a shame that an AC version of the 444 wasn't specified. Much as I tend to dislike Virgin stock they at least feel like an Intercity train and I'll be sticking with them on my future journeys to Scotland!

You can't specify a 444 as they can't made any more. Only reason they got a 350 was because they tagged it on the end of the LM order. Going for anything else would haven meant that no EMU would have been in service until later in 2014.

But a 350 feels more spacious than a 390 and I know I'd rather do the Desiro to Scotland anyway.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,153
You can't specify a 444 as they can't made any more. Only reason they got a 350 was because they tagged it on the end of the LM order. Going for anything else would haven meant that no EMU would have been in service until later in 2014.

But a 350 feels more spacious than a 390 and I know I'd rather do the Desiro to Scotland anyway.

By far the better train on the WCML. Can you imagine the TPE services with end doors, it would be horrendous.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
By far the better train on the WCML. Can you imagine the TPE services with end doors, it would be horrendous.

While I'm not familiar with the Scottish service or via Bolton, TPE with end doors is not the best.

TPE is part intercity and part commuter so not current stock would be suitable. Will be interesting to see what stock/layout it gets when the EMUs arrive in force.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,846
Location
Nottingham
Having doors part way down the coach doesn't affect the level of comfort much, provided the doors themselves give a good seal and don't rattle. Plug doors as fitted to the 350 are much better in this respect than the sliding doors on older units. This layout also gives room for people to stand, rather than blocking the aisles and making life difficult for those who do have seats. Even if they avoid Bolton I think some of these units will be full and standing some of the time.

As an example, I think most people would agree that the interior of a 170, as fitted out for CrossCountry for instance, is much better than that of a Voyager.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top