dvboy
Established Member
Yes. All brand new 4-car 350s (with an "intercity-style" layout, whatever that actually means).
In other words, not 3+2 seating like the 350/2s
Yes. All brand new 4-car 350s (with an "intercity-style" layout, whatever that actually means).
Yes. All brand new 4-car 350s (with an "intercity-style" layout, whatever that actually means).
If the new units are going to have one third two third doors then they won't be Intercity style trains whatever the internal set up.
Having end gangways also disqualifies them as inter-city stock for me.
I think they mean seating layout (2x2 and reasonable knee room).
The current 350/1s are nice trains overall though.
Unlike 185s they are very quiet without the noise and vibration from those pesky underfloor diesels.
By comparison the 350/2s are horrid, cramped trains with a metro ambience, despite being identical dynamically.
LM seem to delight in putting unsuitable 350/2s on Birmingham-Liverpool services rather than 350/1s.
At least TPE can't do that on Manchester-Scotland (and they will have a trolley, something else LM got rid of).
I very much agree and I agree that the 350/1 units are decent enough trains - on a route such as Euston to Rugby (or Birmingham at a push), but they're just not suitable for Manchester - Glasgow/Edinburgh. Its a shame that an AC version of the 444 wasn't specified. Much as I tend to dislike Virgin stock they at least feel like an Intercity train and I'll be sticking with them on my future journeys to Scotland!
You can't specify a 444 as they can't made any more. Only reason they got a 350 was because they tagged it on the end of the LM order. Going for anything else would haven meant that no EMU would have been in service until later in 2014.
But a 350 feels more spacious than a 390 and I know I'd rather do the Desiro to Scotland anyway.
By far the better train on the WCML. Can you imagine the TPE services with end doors, it would be horrendous.