axlecounter
Member
Of course they haven't. After its installed we get no manual. Just muddle through with information shared in the mess room.
Don’t have a PIS manual?

Of course they haven't. After its installed we get no manual. Just muddle through with information shared in the mess room.
Never had them with 170s either. Learn as you go along.Don’t have a PIS manual?![]()
Interesting. How does the early morning ECS get to Sheringham and Cromer ; two paths ?Blimey, how on earth did I spell more???
Yes sounds about right. Thankfully we leave all that sort of crap to the ROG boys & girls. A couple have been brought across from Crown Point together. The drivers concerned pleaded ignorance. Saved them walking back out in the rain though![]()
Interesting. How does the early morning ECS get to Sheringham and Cromer ; two paths ?
It's reliability has left lots to be desired lately. Either legacy units or send the second one behind & start the 05:53 from Cromer at Walsham.Interesting. How does the early morning ECS get to Sheringham and Cromer ; two paths ?
Unless you have a spare/standby driver & guard to run earlier it's not really possible. Guards sign on 04:50 & drivers at 04:54/05:00 for that job.2 paths one of which goes from crown point empty, sadly they seem to be late every day to form the 6.23 from HXM to NRW. Comes to something when the first empty train if the day is routinely late.
Why is that? Is it likely to be permitted at some point?Also the 755s are still not permitted to work in multiple.
Oh yes but anybody's guess when. Things seem to get authorised suddenly overnight.Why is that? Is it likely to be permitted at some point?
I thought it was to do with 755s being accepted into service first. It does make sense the 755s or 745 being allocated to a stopping IC service where its superior acceleration would help make up time when running late. The loco hauled sets cope with the Nin90 perfectly fine.It would appear the NiN services are diagrammed for 2 x 755/4 rather than a 745. Does anyone know why ? Are 2x755 more powerful/faster than a 745?
Just because it uses Linux does not mean the interface for managing it is any good. It could be, if someone takes the effort to understand how it is used and what the interface requires (called Usability design or UX for short) but that is not always done well.
I thought it was to do with 755s being accepted into service first. It does make sense the 755s or 745 being allocated to a stopping IC service where its superior acceleration would help make up time when running late. The loco hauled sets cope with the Nin90 perfectly fine.
Apart from a smart pull away from station stops, which will help a little, the 745s will not be any faster, than a 90 / DVT overall well maybe 4 or 5 mins max.
A 755 in electric mode will easily gain almost a minute over a Class 90 hauled service on every station stop requiring acceleration from.rest to 90 or 100mph. We shall see in due course what the 745s are capable of doing..but i do not expect them to be significantly slower. With a 7 stop diagram - Stratford, Chelmsford, Colchester, Manningtree, Ipswich, Stowmarket and Diss..you could easily improve the schedule by at least 1 min per stop - subject to pathing among other services. Once the whole fleet is solely in the hands of 720/745/755's a major timetable improvement could take place.Apart from a smart pull away from station stops, which will help a little, the 745s will not be any faster, than a 90 / DVT overall well maybe 4 or 5 mins max.
Just sampled a 755/3 in diesel mode. Much quicker off the line than a Class 170!!! 0 to 60mph in less than 70 seconds! Still quicker than even a Class 802 bi-mode. Who would have thought that Anglia secondary regional services would have quicker bi-modes than GWR mainline!!
Just sampled a 755/3 in diesel mode. Much quicker off the line than a Class 170!!! 0 to 60mph in less than 70 seconds! Still quicker than
Quicker acceleration on electric to 100mph - yes for both 3 and 4 car. There is no doubt these could be engineered for 125mph too - if a TOC wanted it. But mainly I am talking about diesel mode here. I could not have dreamt that even the lower power to weight ratio 3 -car would accelerate to 60mph on diesel quicker than a class 802 in diesel mode!Quicker than an 802 on electric?
OTT can't see the stock allocations can it? To my knowledge they aren't public, you can only see the timing load, which would show 755 regardless of what was actually used.The 1201 is showing as a 755 on OTT
Is it an actual interview? To me it read like having received a letter from GA replying to queries sent in advance.
Certainly was passing Bury St Edmunds. The opposite diagram is the 170.The 1201 is showing as a 755 on OTT
Pretty much all the timing loads are for 755, but at the moment a 170 or 156 is just as likely to turn up. Only Norwich to Cambridge seems to be guaranteed 755s at the moment. Plus the majority of Ipswich to Cambridge turns. Seems the 170 is also used on Ipswich Cambridge too at the moment, but probably cos the 156's cannot keep time!OTT can't see the stock allocations can it? To my knowledge they aren't public, you can only see the timing load, which would show 755 regardless of what was actually used.
Yes...and lack of trained crew at Colchester. Spoke to a Liverpool St driver yesterday who says they have now started their Stadler training.It is gutting for me to see many 755s in the sidings and be on a conked out 156 leaving Cambridge. Is it due to lack of trained crew at Ipswich?
This Peterborough - Ipswich diagram was a 4 car 755, I was on it.How many 755s on the Peterboro service? And are they 3 or 4 car?
Those 755s at Cambridge where dumped there from new. Can't do much as need to be dragged to Norwich by ROG before mileage accumulation can start.It is gutting for me to see many 755s in the sidings and be on a conked out 156 leaving Cambridge. Is it due to lack of trained crew at Ipswich?
It is gutting for me to see many 755s in the sidings and be on a conked out 156 leaving Cambridge