• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Automation and Train Driver Job Security

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Gooner18

Member
Joined
24 Oct 2018
Messages
574
the Victoria line has been fully automated since day dot, I think most underground lines are now with the driver there just to monitor and over ride in emergencies
 

Intermodal

Established Member
Joined
3 Nov 2010
Messages
1,307
Location
I wonder how long I can make my location on this f
Hello.

I just wanted to gain some opinions about how automation might affect train driver job security.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...o_subway_systems#Grade-of-Automation_4_(GoA4)

Do you think this will come anytime soon to the UK? Obviously this would result in a cut of train drivers, would it not?
This has been discussed many times on this forum and I am sure a search would return comprehensive discussion.

Automation of this level for non-suburban services is not on the cards any time soon.
 

bionic

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2013
Messages
883
Any money the government has to invest in this technology is being thrown down the HS2 black hole so I wouldn't worry about it. Its a bit different with regard to systems like LU or anything being built from scratch, I can't see them building anything brand new which isn't automated from the off now, but the drivers on most of the lines around the UK are safe for many years to come.

The ATO signalling upgrade on the SSR part of LU is an absolute shambles which they can't get to work on the simplest bit of track, they daren't turn on the Thameslink core section anytime soon seeing as they can't organise basics like recruiting staff and building depots, and the Heathrow tunnels have completely mangled the Crossrail ATO plans for that section. With all of that in mind I can't see the Cumbrian coast, the branches around Bristol or the Potteries loop getting automated anytime in the next millennium!

As a caveat to that though, I would avoid the Underground if you are looking to get into driving as they have already let the cat out of the bag with regards to splitting the train operator grade depending on whether their work is manual or automatic after they've got more than 50% of the system running ATO. Its way behind schedule, naturally, but there's a major war coming on LU over that in a few years (If they ever get the sub surface finished!).
 
Last edited:

Elwyn

Member
Joined
5 May 2014
Messages
490
Location
Co. Antrim, Ireland
I think there’s also an important customer perspective. We know that planes can fly without a pilot. (Drones are an obvious example) but would you travel in one? I wouldn’t. The same thing goes for train travel. It’s OK to have a driverless train with something like the Glasgow subway or the DLR where the speeds are relatively slow, the routes fairly simple, but not for the national network. I wouldn’t really want to travel in a driverless train from London to Glasgow. There are too many things to go wrong outside technology’s control. So you would have one bad smash and the passengers would simply abandon it as a reliable way to travel. Too risky. Commercial suicide to have driverless trains on that type of journey.


I think drivers will be needed for a long time to come, on most routes anyway.
 

fIIsion

Member
Joined
20 May 2009
Messages
46
Any money the government has to invest in this technology is being thrown down the HS2 black hole so I wouldn't worry about it. Its a bit different with regard to systems like LU or anything being built from scratch, I can't see them building anything brand new which isn't automated from the off now, but the drivers on most of the lines around the UK are safe for many years to come.

The ATO signalling upgrade on the SSR part of LU is an absolute shambles which they can't get to work on the simplest bit of track, they daren't turn on the Thameslink core section anytime soon seeing as they can't organise basics like recruiting staff and building depots, and the Heathrow tunnels have completely mangled the Crossrail ATO plans for that section. With all of that in mind I can't see the Cumbrian coast, the branches around Bristol or the Potteries loop getting automated anytime in the next millennium!

As a caveat to that though, I would avoid the Underground if you are looking to get into driving as they have already let the cat out of the bag with regards to splitting the train operator grade depending on whether their work is manual or automatic after they've got more than 50% of the system running ATO. Its way behind schedule, naturally, but there's a major war coming on LU over that in a few years (If they ever get the sub surface finished!).


Drivers, whether manual or ATO get the same pay and benefits. Since drivers are able to transfer to any line and receive training in accordance to that line, it is highly doubtful that there will be different pay bands.
 

bionic

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2013
Messages
883

Drivers, whether manual or ATO get the same pay and benefits. Since drivers are able to transfer to any line and receive training in accordance to that line, it is highly doubtful that there will be different pay bands.

Yes I know they do... for now. There was a leaked internal document a few years ago that had all LUs plans in it. Closure of all booking offices, FFTF etc. That document also covered the proposed regrading of the current Train Operator Grade and new job descriptions for manual and ATO lines once they get ATO introduced on 50% of the combine. It'll be out and out carnage when LU decide to finally play the splitting the grade card.
 

Gooner18

Member
Joined
24 Oct 2018
Messages
574
I guess it was only ever a matter of time before LU went the route of full automation
 

Blanka

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2013
Messages
18
Any job that has an element of unskilled repetitive labour is in line for automation. The technology is available, just a matter of cost and implementation. ERTMS seems to be the first step in future full automation of European railways, but whether we see an autonomous train on the mainline in the next 50 years is up for contention. Interesting topic though.
 

Dave1987

On Moderation
Joined
20 Oct 2012
Messages
4,563
Guys those of you who are wanting to get into train driving as a career then I highly encourage you to apply. This forum has had many threads where the arguments have been discussed ad infinitum. If you search you will find them. There are so many variables on the mainline that I certainly can’t foresee a time where an organic squidgy bit won’t be required at the front.

Any job that has an element of unskilled repetitive labour is in line for automation.

I would certainly challenge your rhetoric there, certainly at this time of year. When I am having to use my skill and experience to brake for a station on a very slippery day with a bit of drizzle in the air I would certainly not call it unskilled repetitive labour!
 

bionic

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2013
Messages
883
The only people who think it's unskilled are people who've never done the job.
 

Blanka

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2013
Messages
18
Totally see where you're coming from, but if you abstract the elements of the job into its individual parts much of it could be carried out by current and emerging technologies. If technology could perform all aspects of a driver's job (or any job for that matter) it doesn't matter if you think it's a skill or not, because a system can perform it for £X amount less per year than a human. It's not a personal attack so please don't take it that way, but it would be naive to think that a company wouldn't replace primary responsibility for train operation to an automated system if they had half the chance. I don't think it'll happen in our lifetime, fingers crossed.







I would certainly challenge your rhetoric there, certainly at this time of year. When I am having to use my skill and experience to brake for a station on a very slippery day with a bit of drizzle in the air I would certainly not call it unskilled repetitive labour!
 

Economist

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2013
Messages
546
When it comes to the express services, I'd say that there's very much a "skin in the game" argument. The bottom line is that the public know that if the driver makes an error, they personally are at risk, whereas if it's remotely operated from a control room, none of the staff have skin in the game. For similar reasons, there's a lot of opposition to pilotless airliners.

Many of the regional services still rely on Absolute Block signalling, a tried and tested method which was replaced on busy routes in the 1950's with Track Circuit Block. When one considers how much drivers cost, relative to the cost-effectiveness (or lack thereof) of installing ATO on rural routes with few services but lots of route milelage, I don't see ATO arriving there soon.

Lastly, a computer cannot make a dispatch decision, nor can it drive the train in an emergency, so there will always be a member of staff on the train. With regards to the grade-splitting, if your salary was to be reduced by 50%, how long would you be willing to go on strike for to make sure it didn't happen? I think the only way they'd stand even a remote chance of bringing in a seperate grade would be to apply it to new starts only.
 

ST

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2013
Messages
284
Any job that has an element of unskilled repetitive labour is in line for automation. The technology is available, just a matter of cost and implementation. ERTMS seems to be the first step in future full automation of European railways, but whether we see an autonomous train on the mainline in the next 50 years is up for contention. Interesting topic though.

Unskilled repitative labour?! Don't agree with your comment I am afraid. Can I ask what you do at present? Are you a driver?
 

Dieseldriver

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2012
Messages
1,004
Guys those of you who are wanting to get into train driving as a career then I highly encourage you to apply. This forum has had many threads where the arguments have been discussed ad infinitum. If you search you will find them. There are so many variables on the mainline that I certainly can’t foresee a time where an organic squidgy bit won’t be required at the front.



I would certainly challenge your rhetoric there, certainly at this time of year. When I am having to use my skill and experience to brake for a station on a very slippery day with a bit of drizzle in the air I would certainly not call it unskilled repetitive labour!
Indeed. Nice attempt at a subtle, uneducated dig at a role the poster clearly knows nothing about...
 

hooverboy

On Moderation
Joined
12 Oct 2017
Messages
1,373
When it comes to the express services, I'd say that there's very much a "skin in the game" argument. The bottom line is that the public know that if the driver makes an error, they personally are at risk, whereas if it's remotely operated from a control room, none of the staff have skin in the game. For similar reasons, there's a lot of opposition to pilotless airliners.

Many of the regional services still rely on Absolute Block signalling, a tried and tested method which was replaced on busy routes in the 1950's with Track Circuit Block. When one considers how much drivers cost, relative to the cost-effectiveness (or lack thereof) of installing ATO on rural routes with few services but lots of route milelage, I don't see ATO arriving there soon.

Lastly, a computer cannot make a dispatch decision, nor can it drive the train in an emergency, so there will always be a member of staff on the train. With regards to the grade-splitting, if your salary was to be reduced by 50%, how long would you be willing to go on strike for to make sure it didn't happen? I think the only way they'd stand even a remote chance of bringing in a seperate grade would be to apply it to new starts only.
agreed that fully autonamous mainline service is not on the cards any time soon.Metro's,and underground is a different matter.I fully expect most will be at the very least a "jubilee" line level of automation in the very near future(along with platform doors- which actually is a good thing as this has reduced "one under" incidents on said stations)

what IS on the cards will be much better in cab signalling with real time track info-again a bonus as you'll see what's coming up, irrespective of weather conditions outside which may impede visibility.This will free up drivers from being restricted to such small sections for route learning.The area covered will be much greater.
it'll be for instance Bedford-brighton direct (no changeover at luton or blackfriars)
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,893
what IS on the cards will be much better in cab signalling with real time track info-again a bonus as you'll see what's coming up, irrespective of weather conditions outside which may impede visibility.This will free up drivers from being restricted to such small sections for route learning.The area covered will be much greater.
it'll be for instance Bedford-brighton direct (no changeover at luton or blackfriars)
I don’t think anything currently on the cards will reduce the extent or depth of route learning required. I’m fairly sure that Bedford drivers already sign right through to Brighton too - it’s not a long way, although it is complex in a lot of places.
 

bionic

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2013
Messages
883
what IS on the cards will be much better in cab signalling with real time track info-again a bonus as you'll see what's coming up, irrespective of weather conditions outside which may impede visibility.This will free up drivers from being restricted to such small sections for route learning.The area covered will be much greater.
it'll be for instance Bedford-brighton direct (no changeover at luton or blackfriars)

Bedford and Brighton drivers sign the whole route. The crew changes are purely for resourcing and diagramming reasons.
 

dctraindriver

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2017
Messages
610

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,548
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I wouldn't say any driver starting now has to worry. At worst they will end up in part in a guard's job (I do see a long-term future of guard-only operation), but realistically full automation will be a long time coming and as people are retiring and leaving all the time they will most likely just not replace them when it comes to it.
 

Pete C

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2018
Messages
174
It's not like driverless cars where they can (in theory at least) operate on existing infrastructure, the whole signalling system needs to be upgraded for ATO to work, and we've seen how bad Network Rail is at just getting electrification done, let alone anything else!

I just don't see there being enough investment in the railways to get it done for decades yet, even on the busiest routes (not counting LU of course).
 

Economist

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2013
Messages
546
If TfL can complete the Four Lines Modernisation project successfully, the Thameslink "core" works and Crossrail does too, then I reckon they'll try and introduce more of it. That said, on the first two projects where they are applying ATO to existing infrastructure, there has been quite a few problems. In the next couple of decades, we might see ATO become much more widespread.

As hooverboy has said, the real business case is on metro/subsurban operations. The only question for me is how it would be applied on tracks shared by multiple TOCs. If TOC A wants to introduce ATO but TOC B doesn't want to upgrade rolling stock, there could be a challenge.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,548
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
If TfL can complete the Four Lines Modernisation project successfully, the Thameslink "core" works and Crossrail does too, then I reckon they'll try and introduce more of it. That said, on the first two projects where they are applying ATO to existing infrastructure, there has been quite a few problems. In the next couple of decades, we might see ATO become much more widespread.

As hooverboy has said, the real business case is on metro/subsurban operations. The only question for me is how it would be applied on tracks shared by multiple TOCs. If TOC A wants to introduce ATO but TOC B doesn't want to upgrade rolling stock, there could be a challenge.

If the ATO didn't introduce things like moving block, they could coexist quite happily. Indeed, LU allows drivers to drive manually on ATO lines if they wish, some do and some don't.
 

hooverboy

On Moderation
Joined
12 Oct 2017
Messages
1,373
As hooverboy has said, the real business case is on metro/subsurban operations. The only question for me is how it would be applied on tracks shared by multiple TOCs. If TOC A wants to introduce ATO but TOC B doesn't want to upgrade rolling stock, there could be a challenge.

signalling is not really anything to do with TOC's.It's ultimately network rail's call with ROSCO's being informed of what is required to be installed/run on the network.
ALL rolling stock needs to conform to a national standard of operation.
 

387star

On Moderation
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
6,664
Would a driverless train know to blow the horn at the waving smiling people standing on bridges ?
 

big all

On Moderation
Joined
23 Sep 2018
Messages
876
Location
redhill
to be honest like most jobs a train drivers job is highly skilled but your daily job and routine after a year or so should only use perhaps 5-10% off your normal brain capacity in otherwords automated actions with the other 92% going into unusual situations like failures off doors signals or perhaps adheasion problems
if you are constantly thinking or worrying you may be in the wrong job
 

PaulBusDriver

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2018
Messages
253
I still can't forsee a system capable of being fully aware enough to cope with all the unexpected situations adequately for a long time to come.
In my job we have idiots that do completely unexpected things all the time, we can cope with that due to experience but if it comes
down to it with an automated system and it results in a tragic accident, the public opinion will turn on automated systems and it
would be a expensive failure so until the sytems are 100% totally reliable I think human drivers are safe in employment.
 

Jim Jehosofat

Member
Joined
17 May 2017
Messages
181
I was told years ago that anyone can drive a train. Stopping one is something completely different and stopping one at the right time and place is the hardest part.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top