Bantamzen
Established Member
I think Michael Palin would be best suited, after all he is used to travelling...I now have a mental picture of Michael Palin or John Cleese saying this over the Tannoy![]()

I think Michael Palin would be best suited, after all he is used to travelling...I now have a mental picture of Michael Palin or John Cleese saying this over the Tannoy![]()
And replaced with what? The same issues will still be apparent no matter whose name is on the side of the trains.
They'll certainly lose money on a lot of tickets that were sold in advance, or a number of people simply won't bother. We're going to Scotland for a week in August on 1S37 from Rugby to Glasgow. 1S37 now starts at Crewe ... but there's no way of getting to Crewe before it leaves. From a 4 hour direct service arriving at 1103 to a 6 hour 3-train manoeuvre arriving at 1404. That'll be a no.
They'll certainly lose money on a lot of tickets that were sold in advance, or a number of people simply won't bother. We're going to Scotland for a week in August on 1S37 from Rugby to Glasgow. 1S37 now starts at Crewe ... but there's no way of getting to Crewe before it leaves. From a 4 hour direct service arriving at 1103 to a 6 hour 3-train manoeuvre arriving at 1404. That'll be a no.
What date is this?
Saturday 20 August is a strike day (as is Thursday 18 August)20 August. It's still showing on that date but I doubt very much if the shambles will sort itself out by then.
In all fairness whilst right now they’re preforming abysmally, its nothing like as poor as Trans Pennine’s ongoing record has been over the last 2 years.Someone, anyone, with the slightest sense of any duty or responsibility towards the travelling public.
Notably, both the current poor (appalling) performers - TPE and Avanti - are run by the same owning group. “Transforming travel” apparently.In all fairness whilst they’re currently preforming very badly its nothing like as poor as Trans Pennine’s record has been over the last 2 years
An emergency timetable is a great idea, however my concern is that any emergency timetable will become permanent and the this the railway becomes irreversibly unattractive to the travelling public.
It doesn't matter who is nominally "in charge", if the purse-string holders (DfT) refuse to allow enough staff to be recruited.Is there anyone in charge at Avanti? Who allows this to happen, not just at the weekends but now on weekdays as well. This situation is quite appalling and nobody seems to take any responsibility for it. It could only happen and continue to happen for so long on the railways.
Avanti are a joke.
DfT need to let them recruit drivers and TMs none stop in the same way they allowed it on GWR. Time they took the bull by the horns and stop tinkering by taking on a few apprentices here and there.
Now this:
"Due to a person being hit by a train between Preston and Lancaster all lines are blocked.
Impact:
Train services running through these stations may be cancelled or delayed. Disruption is expected until 16:00 22/07."
Not a good week for the west coast. Weather disruption Monday, Tuesday & Wednesday. Then fatalities Thursday and Friday.Another dreadful incident, and of course beyond Avanti's control..... But it meant that the 1040 from Central, the first train remember since the 0630, terminated at Lancaster.
Which doesn't really make any difference. The same problem would arise on any Saturday. I'm sure that the passengers turning up at Rugby (and for that matter MKC or Stafford) for 1S37 tomorrow are going to be *incredibly* impressed that they'll be arriving three hours late (if anyone bothers to tell them how to get to Glasgow via VT, of course - it's not simple).Saturday 20 August is a strike day (as is Thursday 18 August)
Why should TOCs who are running their current timetable reliably (such as LNER) do this?and all other TOCs should be doing this as well
As has been pointed out previously by @Watershed, LNER increased staffing levels in advance of some services that haven’t yet materialised.Why should TOCs who are running their current timetable reliably (such as LNER) do this?
From a quick look at this emergency timetable, if travelling from Euston to the West Midlands, there really seems little attraction in using Avanti’s services, particularly northbound where the trains are scheduled to take 1:45 hours from Euston to Birmingham New Street. At those timings you might as well use London North Western or Chiltern and pay half the price for a service that only takes 15 to 30 minutes longer.An emergency timetable is a great idea, however my concern is that any emergency timetable will become permanent and the this the railway becomes irreversibly unattractive to the travelling public.
The post I was replying to suggested that all TOCs should be running emergency timetables, and I was simply asking the valid question of why TOCs who aren’t struggling with reliability should introduce emergency timetable cuts. I used LNER as an example of such a TOC that can run their current timetable reliably. The reasons why LNER are performing better than other TOCs aren’t relevant to that particular point.As has been pointed out previously by @Watershed, LNER increased staffing levels in advance of some services that haven’t yet materialised.
Indeed. The long arm of the DFT is no doubt hampering operations at the moment. Until someone comes along with a bit of vision and also the ability to loosen the purse strings a bit, then the outstanding issues are not going to be resolved.
I'm going to the Lakes this weekend by car because of this shambles. As I'd be going walk-up, that's £106.60 in the bin for Avanti and in the diesel tank for me, and possibly a SP upgrade too.
The post I was replying to suggested that all TOCs should be running emergency timetables, and I was simply asking the valid question of why TOCs who aren’t struggling with reliability should introduce emergency timetable cuts. I used LNER as an example of such a TOC that can run their current timetable reliably. The reasons why LNER are performing better than other TOCs aren’t relevant to that particular point.
Avanti are also running a reduced service. The difference between Avanti and other TOCs is most of the others are capable of running the reduced service, Avanti aren’t.TOCs who are not struggling for staff have introduced reduced services as budget cuts. Each DfT TOC had to put up a suite of potential cuts to the DfT, which then decided which ones to implement.