The cynic in me wonders whether they were given a back-hander by a representative of the owner?"Two male youths, aged 17 and 13, have been arrested and charged in connection with fire-raising following station hotel fire". A 17 year old was charged with arson for the earlier fire, wonder if it's the same youth?
The Cynic in me wonders whether a back-hander came from the local council , saves them £600k+ paying for the scaffolding.The cynic in me wonders whether they were given a back-hander by a representative of the owner?
I suspect there’s at least an element of distancing themselves from the issue here.For our non Scottish members wondering why it's not arson, the charge and crime in Scotland is that of willful fire-raising.
I've been reading various statements sent out by ScotRail management about a 'derelict hotel near Ayr Station'. The hotel and station are one and the same building! These people seem to be entirely clueless when it comes to railway history, probably not even knowing that this was once the property of BR, through British Transport Hotels.
For our non Scottish members wondering why it's not arson, the charge and crime in Scotland is that of willful fire-raising.
I've been reading various statements sent out by ScotRail management about a 'derelict hotel near Ayr Station'. The hotel and station are one and the same building! These people seem to be entirely clueless when it comes to railway history, probably not even knowing that this was once the property of BR, through British Transport Hotels.
Given the previous disruption that's been caused, if NR had the resources to do any more than anybody else I think they would have done it. Having had a previous experience of trying to chase a resident of the same town about some issue on a flat who simply refused to engage in any way, I can't imagine it's going to be worth anybody's resources to pursue this internationally.I'm not a legal expert but I'm pretty sure the buildings owner's (or their insurers) will be liable for any disruption.
And while still a publicly funded organisation, NR undoubtedly have considerably more resources than the local council to pursue it. So that ought to motivate people wherever they may be based.
I can honestly see this lasting well into next year. But hey, this sorry fiasco has been ongoing for over a decade now, so what's 4-5 more months?And that is exceptionally optimistic from them. This will be several weeks minimum.
A consise summing up of this whole sorry mess, I concur fully.For those not familiar, along with many small towns, it is fair to say Ayr has a struggling retail centre, with a lot of large retailers closing through the transition to out of town outlets / the transition to online / COVID / the closure of several large retailers .... the last Wilko store I set foot in .....
The railway is one of the great assets, with a pretty good service to Glasgow and then beyond, but for a long time passengers have been diverted through a funny side gate around the back of a clearly insecure building behind Heras fencing, and the fenced off areas looming large over the station.
It is the opitome of failed planning and poor local government, along with the poor governance of the railway, that such a building was not seized and either demolished in a controlled way, to give a new gateway to the town, or to find alternative use and constructive purpose for such a key building within the town.
As no such action was taken over several years, all that has happened was somewhat inevitable.
What is quite interesting is the number of municipal type buildings which have been successfully leased on peppercorn rent to Community Interest Companies and the like to give renewed purpose to a building. It seems when it comes to key bits of land, in significant locations, a "Use it or Lose it" order should be applicable by the local authority within a given period or the land automatically passes to the local authority to utilise or regenerate as appropriate.I can honestly see this lasting well into next year. But hey, this sorry fiasco has been ongoing for over a decade now, so what's 4-5 more months?
A consise summing up of this whole sorry mess, I concur fully.
Yes, I'm fully aware of the financial pressues most local authorities are and have been under, but those same financial pressures just makes the situation of casting god knows how much public money to the four winds keeping this unstable building secure for over 10 years all the more ludicrous. What happened on Monday evening was years in the making and the only - and most important obviously - saving grace is that no-one was injured.
That scaffolding appears to be severely damaged in some places and may well be a total loss, so SAC may well be on the hook for replacing it. Notwithstanding that, it’s quite possibly beyond being able to be dismantled: remember, it’s been heated well beyond any temperature it would encounter in normal use and may need to be cut up on site.The Cynic in me wonders whether a back-hander came from the local council , saves them £600k+ paying for the scaffolding.
Am honestly quite surprised this isn't a thing already, as I can see the benefits, at least in principle. Can't see it happening in the current climate sadly.What is quite interesting is the number of municipal type buildings which have been successfully leased on peppercorn rent to Community Interest Companies and the like to give renewed purpose to a building. It seems when it comes to key bits of land, in significant locations, a "Use it or Lose it" order should be applicable by the local authority within a given period or the land automatically passes to the local authority to utilise or regenerate as appropriate.
If South Ayrshire Council, ScotRail, Network Rail, Transport Scotland and the local bus operators (primarily Stagecoach) knocked their heads together, that is. Am not holding my breath though.I just hope if whats left of the building is town down, something like a transportation hub can be built in its place at the very least.
Glasgow primarily, yes (silently seethes about the Glasgow School of Art). Seems to be an endemic thing for the West Coast of Scotland though.As @james73 mentions, Glasgow has had many wonderful buildings go up in smoke (pardon the pun) over the years.
Yes, the land is still owned and the owner is still ultimately responsible for what happens with the remains.Probably not the best question and not that it should be allowed to be lost in this way, but if the building no longer exists, is “ownership” still an issue?
I doubt that extradition would be seen as a reasonable response. A CPO or whatever the scottish equivalent is would be extremely unlikely to meet the threshold for an extradition treaty even if the UK has one with the country where the owner is. Even if it did, the amount of time and legal resources it would tie up fighting this through the courts to secure such and order, and then the police resources to actually effect the extradition, would be completely disproportionate.Otherwise, is extradition possible for the owner to engage with a CPO in Scotland?
That is likely the outcome now - still runs into the ownership problem thoughKnock it down and stop crying over split milk.
Knock it down and stop crying over split milk.